Hyundo Kim
ABSTRACT
This paper introduces a new 2.5D interaction space by a touch-sensitive screen along with over-the-top projection mapping. Indeed, users can simultaneously interact with virtual objects in the touch-sensitive screen and move the virtual objects with real objects (or body fingers or hands) in the elevated 2.5D space projected by the over-the-top projector in the touch-sensitive screen. Two 2D tracking devices are used to trace the real objects. Using the tracking devices, the states (position, rotation, size) of the real objects are calculated. The realistic images are then projection-mapped to the real objects using the projector installed on the top of the touch-sensitive display. We discuss three interaction mechanisms to be employed in the 2.5D interaction space: Poking, Swaying, and Rotating. A working prototype with the interaction mechanism in the 2.5D interaction space was proposed, and a large scale usability testing is being planned.
- Brown, E., & Cairns, P. (2004, April). A grounded investigation of game immersion. In CHI'04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 1297--1300). ACM. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Coutrix, C., & Nigay, L. (2006, May). Mixed reality: a model of mixed interaction. In Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces (pp. 43--50). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Havig, P., McIntire, J., & Geiselman, E. (2011, June). Virtual reality in a cave: limitations and the need for HMDs?. In Head-and Helmet-Mounted Displays XVI: Design and Applications (Vol. 8041, p. 804107). International Society for Optics and Photonics.Google Scholar
- Hooi, R., & Cho, H. (2012, November). Being immersed: Avatar similarity and self-awareness. In Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (pp. 232--240). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jennett, C., Cox, A. L., Cairns, P., Dhoparee, S., Epps, A., Tijs, T., & Walton, A. (2008). Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International journal of human-computer studies, 66(9), 641--661. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johnson, A. (2006). VR as Instructional Technology--The CAVE as Classroom. Configuring history: Teaching the Harlem renaissance through virtual reality cityscapes. Retrieved November, 12, 2008.Google Scholar
- Riecke, B. E. (2010). Compelling self-motion through virtual environments without actual self-motion--Using self-motion illusions ('vection') to improve VR user experience. In Virtual reality. InTech.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- 2.5D Interaction Space: Elevating 2D Display with an Over-the-Top Projection Mapping
Recommendations
From body space to interaction space: modeling spatial cooperation for virtual humans
AAMAS '11: The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 3This paper introduces a model which connects representations of the space surrounding a virtual humanoid's body with the space it shares with several interaction partners. This work intends to support virtual humans (or humanoid robots) in near space ...
Specifying Interaction Space Components in a FIPA-ACL Interaction Framework
Languages, Methodologies and Development Tools for Multi-Agent SystemsDespite the acceptance of FIPA-ACL as a standard for agent communications, there exist a gap between its specification and infrastructures supporting interactions among agents. The hypothesis we study in this paper is that interaction space components ...
InformationSense: Trade-offs for the Design and the Implementation of a Large Highly Deformable Cloth Display
Deformable displays can provide two major benefits compared to rigid displays: Objects of different shapes and deformabilities, situated in our physical environment, can be equipped with deformable displays, and users can benefit from their pre-existing ...
Comments