skip to main content
10.1145/3270316.3272053acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschi-playConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design Rationales of a Mobile Game-Based Intervention for German Dyslexic Children

Published:23 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Educational games have been shown to provide support for children with learning disabilities to overcome their challenges. Gaming and feedback elements can benefit the learning process while keeping children engaged and help them to regain motivation for learning. We present the design of a mobile serious game for German dyslexic primary school children that incorporates gaming elements such as narrative, pedagogical agents, tutorials, feedback, and reward mechanisms. We derive our game design decisions and specify the rationales behind with special focus on the needs and demands of the target group. We evaluate the gaming elements based on the results of 63 children who played the game at home during a period of 9-10 weeks. Results indicate overall positive perception of the game elements. Children were immersed in the fantasy-themed world, liked the pedagogical agents, and indicated that the interactive tutorials gave an easy start into the game, and emphasized the special importance of praise.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

playsl23.mp4

mp4

14.3 MB

References

  1. Philip Abrami, Eugene Borohkovski, and Larysa Lysenko. 2015. The Effects of ABRACADABRA on Reading Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Applied Field Research. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 26, 4 (2015), 337--367.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chadia Abras, Diane Maloney-Krichmar, and Jenny Preece. 2004. User-centered design. Bainbridge, W. Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications 37, 4 (2004), 445--456.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Sylvester Arnab, Theodore Lim, Maira B. Carvalho, Francesco Bellotti, Sara de Freitas, Sandy Louchart, Neil Suttie, Riccardo Berta, and Alessandro De Gloria. 2015. Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis . British Journal of Educational Technology 46, 2 (mar 2015), 391--411.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Kay Berkling. 2017. Phontasia: A phonics game for German and its effect on orthographic skills--first corpus explorations. In WOCCI 2017: 6th International Workshop on Child Computer Interaction. ISCA, ISCA, 7--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Max V. Birk, Cheralyn Atkins, Jason T. Bowey, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2016. Fostering Intrinsic Motivation through Avatar Identification in Digital Games. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 2982--2995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Elizabeth A. Boyle, Thomas Hainey, Thomas M. Connolly, Grant Gray, Jeffrey Earp, Michela Ott, Theodore Lim, Manuel Ninaus, Claudia Ribeiro, and João Pereira. 2016. An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games . Computers & Education 94, Supplement C (2016), 178--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Luciana Cidrim and Francisco Madeiro. 2017. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) applied to dyslexia: literature review . Revista CEFAC 19, 1 (feb 2017), 99--108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gemma Corbalan, Liesbeth Kester, and Jeroen J.G. van Merrië nboer. 2009. Dynamic task selection: Effects of feedback and learner control on efficiency and motivation . Learning and Instruction 19, 6 (dec 2009), 455--465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Diana I. Cordova and Mark R. Lepper. 1996. Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology 88, 4 (1996), 715--730.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Sebastian Deterding, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart Nacke. 2011. From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining "Gamification". In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (MindTrek '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Athanasios Drigas and Elektra Batziaka. 2016. Dyslexia and ICTs, Assessment and Early Intervention in Kindergarten. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) 11, 02 (feb 2016), 53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Allison Druin. 1999. Cooperative Inquiry: Developing New Technologies for Children with Children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '99). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 592--599. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Allison Druin. 2002. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour & Information Technology 21, 1 (jan 2002), 1--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Kevin Durkin, James Boyle, Simon Hunter, and Gina Conti-Ramsden. 2013. Video Games for Children and Adolescents With Special Educational Needs. Zeitschrift fü r Psychologie 221, 2 (jan 2013), 79--89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Severine Erhel and Eric Jamet. 2013. Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness. Computers & Education 67, September (sep 2013), 156--167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Tracy Fullerton. 2008. Game Design Workshop: A Playcentric Approach to Creating Innovative Games (2nd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann, Heidelberg. https://books.google.de/books?id=OjIYWtqWxtACGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Gabe Zichermann and Christopher Cunningham. 2011. Gamification by Design-Implementing Game Mechanics in Web and Mobile Apps. Vol. 27. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 208 pages. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781107415324A009 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Benjamin Goldberg and Janis Cannon-Bowers. 2015. Feedback source modality effects on training outcomes in a serious game: Pedagogical agents make a difference. Computers in Human Behavior 52, 1--2 (nov 2015), 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Abbie Gonzalez. 2014. OpenDyslexic (2014). https://www.opendyslexic.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Usha Goswami, Natasha Mead, Tim Fosker, Martina Huss, Lisa Barnes, and Victoria Leong. 2013. Impaired perception of syllable stress in children with dyslexia: A longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language 69, 1 (2013), 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Thomas Hainey, Thomas M. Connolly, Elizabeth A. Boyle, Amanda Wilson, and Aisya Razak. 2016. A systematic literature review of games-based learning empirical evidence in primary education. Computers & Education 102 (2016), 202--223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Heiko Holz, Katharina Brandelik, Benedikt Beuttler, Jochen Brandelik, and Manuel Ninaus. In press 2018. How to train your syllable stress awareness -- A digital game-based approach for German dyslexic children. International Journal of Serious Games (In press 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Heiko Holz, Katharina Brandelik, Jochen Brandelik, Benedikt Beuttler, Alexandra Kirsch, Jü rgen Heller, and Detmar Meurers. 2017. Prosodiya -- A Mobile Game for German Dyslexic Children. In Games and Learning Alliance: 6th International Conference, GALA 2017, Lisbon, Portugal, December 5-7, 2017, Proceedings, Jo a o Dias, Pedro A. Santos, and Remco C. Veltkamp (Eds.). 73--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Heiko Holz, Manuel Ninaus, Detmar Meurers, and Alexandra Kirsch. 2018. Validitiy and Player Experience of a Mobile Game for German Dyslexic Children. In Extended Abstracts Publication of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '18 Extended Abstracts). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Elena Ise and Gerd Schulte-Kö rne. 2010. Spelling deficits in dyslexia: Evaluation of an orthographic spelling training. Annals of Dyslexia 60, 1 (2010), 18--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Gracia Jimé nez-Ferná ndez, Nicolá s Gutié rrez-Palma, and Sylvia Defior. 2015. Impaired stress awareness in Spanish children with developmental dyslexia. Research in Developmental Disabilities 37 (feb 2015), 152--161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Maria N. Kazakou and Spiros Soulis. 2015. Feedback and the speed of answer of pupils with dyslexia in digital activities. Procedia - Procedia Computer Science 67 (2015), 204--212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Fengfeng Ke and Tatiana Abras. 2013. Games for engaged learning of middle school children with special learning needs. British Journal of Educational Technology 44, 2 (2013), 225--242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Christian Klicpera and Barbara Gasteiger Klicpera. 2000. Sind Rechtschreibschwierigkeiten Ausdruck einer phonologischen Stö rung? Zeitschrift fü r Entwicklungspsychologie und Pä dagogische Psychologie 32, 3 (jul 2000), 134--142.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Jonna Koivisto and Juho Hamari. 2014. Demographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification. Computers in Human Behavior 35 (jun 2014), 179--188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Karin Landerl. 2003. Categorization of vowel length in German poor spellers: An orthographically relevant phonological distinction. Applied Psycholinguistics 24, 4 (2003), 523--538.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Victoria Leong, Jarmo Hämäläinen, Fruzsina Solté sz, and Usha Goswami. 2011. Rise time perception and detection of syllable stress in adults with developmental dyslexia. Journal of Memory and Language 64, 1 (2011), 59--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Sohye Lim and Byron Reeves. 2010. Computer agents versus avatars: Responses to interactive game characters controlled by a computer or other player. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 1--2 (jan 2010), 57--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Manuel Ninaus, Kristian Kiili, Jake McMullen, and Korbinian Moeller. 2016. A Game-Based Approach to Examining Students' Conceptual Knowledge of Fractions. In Games and Learning Alliance: 5th International Conference, GALA 2016, Utrecht, The Netherlands, December 5-7, 2016, Proceedings, Rosa Bottino, Johan Jeuring, and Remco C. Veltkamp (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 37--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Manuel Ninaus, Matthias Witte, Silvia E Kober, Elisabeth V C Friedrich, Erwin Hartsuiker, Christa Neuper, Guilherme Wood, Jü rgen Kurzmann, Erwin Hartsuiker, Christa Neuper, and Guilherme Wood. 2014. Neurofeedback and Serious Games. In Psychology, Pedagogy, and Assessment in Serious Games, Thomas M Connolly, Thomas Hainey, Elizabeth Boyle, Gavin Baxter, and Pablo Moreno-Ger (Eds.). IGI Global, Hershey, PA, USA, 82--110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Donald A Norman and Stephen W Draper. 1986. User Centered System Design; New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. Journal educational computing research 3, 1 (1986), 129--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Hyacinth Nwana. 1990. Intelligent tutoring systems: an overview. Artificial Intelligence Review 4 (1990), 251--277.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Louise E. Parker, Mark R. Lepper, Kim Bartholomew, Diana Cordova, and John Mayer. 1992. Effects of fantasy contexts on children's learning and motivation: Making learning more fun. Journal of personality and social psychology 62, 4 (1992), 625--633.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Jan L. Plass, Steffi Heidig, Elizabeth O. Hayward, Bruce D. Homer, and Enjoon Um. 2014. Emotional design in multimedia learning: Effects of shape and color on affect and learning. Learning and Instruction 29 (2014), 128--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Jan L. Plass, Bruce D. Homer, and Charles K. Kinzer. 2015. Foundations of Game-Based Learning. Educational Psychologist 50, 4 (oct 2015), 258--283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Clark N. Quinn. 2005. Engaging learning: Designing e-learning simulation games. John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Janet C. Read. 2008. Validating the Fun Toolkit: an instrument for measuring children's opinions of technology. Cognition, Technology & Work 10, 2 (apr 2008), 119--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Carola Reuter-Liehr. 1993. Behandlung der Lese-Rechtschreibschwäche nach der Grundschulzeit: Anwendung und Ü berprü fung eines Konzeptes. Zeitschrift fü r Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie 21, 3 (1993), 135--147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Katharina Sauter, Jü rgen Heller, and Karin Landerl. 2012. Sprachrhythmus und Schriftspracherwerb. Lernen und Lernstö rungen 1, 4 (2012), 225--239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Kelly L. Schmitt, Lisa B. Hurwitz, Laura Sheridan Duel, Deborah L Nichols Linebarger, and Deborah L. Nichols Linebarger. 2018. Learning through play: The impact of web-based games on early literacy development. Computers in Human Behavior 81 (2018), 378--389.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Valerie J. Shute. 2008. Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research 78, 1 (mar 2008), 153--189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Sven Staffeldt. 2010. Einfü hrung in die Phonetik, Phonologie und Graphematik des Deutschen. Ein Leitfaden fü r den akademischen Unterricht. Stauffenburg, Tü bingen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Pieter Wouters, Christof van Nimwegen, Herre van Oostendorp, and Erik D van der Spek. 2013. A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology 105, 2 (2013), 249--265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Design Rationales of a Mobile Game-Based Intervention for German Dyslexic Children

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              CHI PLAY '18 Extended Abstracts: Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts
              October 2018
              725 pages
              ISBN:9781450359689
              DOI:10.1145/3270316
              • General Chairs:
              • Florian 'Floyd' Mueller,
              • Daniel Johnson,
              • Ben Schouten,
              • Program Chairs:
              • Phoebe O. Toups Dugas,
              • Peta Wyeth

              Copyright © 2018 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 23 October 2018

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              CHI PLAY '18 Extended Abstracts Paper Acceptance Rate43of123submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate421of1,386submissions,30%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader