skip to main content
10.1145/3282373.3282382acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiiwasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modeling Opinion Formation by Incorporating Users' Expertise and Friendshipness

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this research, we propose a Voter Model introducing expertise weights and friendshipness weights, which is an opinion formation model more suitable to the reality. Since the conventional Voter Model uniformly handles the following users, it is a model that adopts the opinion of the majority of follow users. When choosing an item from some alternatives, the adoption probability is determined by a majority vote. However, when actually making decisions, it is natural to consider the opinions of users who have expert knowledge about target products. Therefore, in this research, we propose a model that reflects the fact that the opinions of follow users are not handled equally, but the opinion of users with high specialty is preferentially selected. Specifically, we quantify the expertise of the user and introduce adoption probability proportional to expertise. Also, at the time of user's decision, it is natural to consider the opinion of users who have similar features such as profiles and circumstances with themselves. Therefore, in this research, we also propose a model reflecting the fact that users' opinions of users with high friendshipness are preferentially selected. In our experimental evaluation, actual data including user's following relationship, user profile, and categories of review items, at the cosmetic site @cosme are used. In the ranking of expected influence degree calculated by the proposed method, we quantitatively evaluate whether reviews of highly ranked users influence other users. We also evaluate how much the ranking result differs from the conventional Voter Model and centrality rankings.

References

  1. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. 2003. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (March 2003), 993--1022. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Brin and L. Page. 1998. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30 (1998), 107--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. E. Even-Dar and A. Shapira. 2007. A Note on Maximizing the Spread of Influence in Social Networks. In Internet and Network Economics, Xiaotie Deng and Fan Graham (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4858. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 281--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. T. Fushimi, K. Saito, M. Kimura, H. Motoda, and K. Ohara. 2010. Finding relation between PageRank and voter model. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Knowledge management and acquisition for smart systems and services (PKAW'10). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 208--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. T. H. Haveliwala. 2003. Topic-Sensitive PageRank: A Context-Sensitive Ranking Algorithm for Web Search. IEEE Trans. on Knowl. and Data Eng. 15, 4 (July 2003), 784--796. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Masahiro Kimura, Kazumi Saito, Kouzou Ohara, and Hiroshi Motoda. 2011. Detecting Anti-majority Opinionists Using Value-weighted Mixture Voter Model. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Discovery Science (DS'11). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 150--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Masahiro Kimura, Kazumi Saito, Kouzou Ohara, and Hiroshi Motoda. 2013. Learning to predict opinion share and detect anti-majority opinionists in social networks. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 41 (08 2013), 5--37. Issue 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. N. Langville and C. D. Meyer. 2004. Deeper Inside PageRank. Internet Mathematics 1, 3 (2004), 335--380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Y. Li, W. Chen, Y. Wang, and Z.-L. Zhang. 2015. Voter Model on Signed Social Networks. Internet Mathematics 11, 2 (2015), 93--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. T. M. Liggett. 1999. Stochastic Interacting Systems: Contact, Voter and Exclusion Processes (Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften) (1 ed.). Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. V. Sood, T. Antal, and S. Redner. 2008. Voter models on heterogeneous networks. Physical Review E 77, 4 (2008), 041121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Yuki Yamagishi, Kazumi Saito, Kouzou Ohara, Masahiro Kimura, and Hiroshi Motoda. 2011. Learning Attribute-weighted Voter Model over Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd Asian Conference on Machine Learning (ACML 2011). JMLR.org, 263--280.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Modeling Opinion Formation by Incorporating Users' Expertise and Friendshipness

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          iiWAS2018: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services
          November 2018
          419 pages

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 19 November 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader