skip to main content
10.1145/3282894.3282897acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Can't You Hear Me?: Investigating Personal Soundscape Curation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Continuous advances in personal audio technology (e.g. headphones), led to efficient noise cancellation and allowed users to build and influence their personal acoustic environment. Despite the high adoption and ubiquitous character of the technology, we do not fully understand which particular factors influence and form usage patterns. As a step towards understanding the usage of personal audio technology, we conducted two focus groups (n=10) to investigate current headphone usage and users' wishes regarding current and future personal audio technology. Based on this data, we derive a model for what we call personal soundscape curation. This model was assessed with the data of a crowdsourced survey on Amazon Mechanical Turk (n=194) on state of the art practices. Personal soundscape curation allows to describe usage strategies (curation, adaptation, renunciation) and break down influencing factors of context and environment as well as illustrate which consequences may arise from the users' behavior.

References

  1. AfterShokz. 2018. Technology - AfterShokz. (2018). https://aftershokz.com/pages/technology Accessed: 8.2.2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Tyler Bickford, Jason Stanyek, and Sumanth Gopinath. 2014. Earbuds Are Good for Sharing: Children's Headphones as Social Media at a Vermont School. The Oxford Handbook of Mobile Music Studies, Vol. 1. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Sara Bly. 1982. Presenting Information in Sound. In Proceedings of the 1982 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '82). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 371--375. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. BRAGI GmbH. 2017. The Dash Pro - True Wireless Intelligent Earphones. (2017). https://www.bragi.com/thedashpro/ Accessed: 17.9.2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Michael Bull. 2001. The World According to Sound: Investigating the World of Walkman Users. New Media & Society 3, 2 (June 2001), 179--197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Michael Bull. 2008a. Sound Moves: IPod Culture and Urban Experience. Routledge, New York, NY, 10001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Michael Bull. 2008b. Sounding Out The City: Personal Stereos and The Management of Everyday Life; Music in Everyday Life. In Sounding Out the City: Personal Stereos and the Management of Everyday Life (Materializing Culture). Berg 3PL, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Andreas Butz and Ralf Jung. 2005. Seamless User Notification in Ambient Soundscapes. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 320--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. George Chernyshov, Benjamin Tag, Jiajun Chen, Vontin Noriyasu, Paul Lukowicz, and Kai Kunze. 2016. Wearable Ambient Sound Display: Embedding Information in Personal Music. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 58--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 1990. Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons and Evaluative Criteria. Zeitschrift fuer Soziologie 19, 6 (1990), 418--427.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Robert Morrison Crane. 2005. Social distance and loneliness as they relate to headphones used with portable audio technology. Ph.D. Dissertation. Humboldt State University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Doppler Labs Inc. 2017. Here One - Wireless Smart Earbuds. (2017). https://hereplus.me/products/here-one Accessed: 17.9.2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Julie S. Downs, Mandy B. Holbrook, Steve Sheng, and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2010. Are your participants gaming the system?: screening mechanical turk workers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2399--2402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jose A. Gallud and Ricardo Tesoriero. 2015. Smartphone Notifications: A Study on the Sound to Soundless Tendency. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (MobileHCI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 819--824. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gartner Inc. 2018. Gartner Says Worldwide Sales of Smartphones Recorded First Ever Decline During the Fourth Quarter of 2017. (Feb. 2018). https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2018-02-22-gartner-says-worldwide-sales-of-smartphones-recorded-first-ever-decline-during-the-fourth-quarter-of-2017 Accessed: 3.10.2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Stavros Garzonis, Chris Bevan, and Eamonn O'Neill. 2008. Mobile Service Audio Notifications: Intuitive Semantics and Noises. In Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Designing for Habitus and Habitat (OZCHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 156--163. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Haapakangas, E. Kankkunen, V. Hongisto, P. Virjonen, D. Oliva, and E. Keskinen. 2011. Effects of Five Speech Masking Sounds on Performance and Acoustic Satisfaction. Implications for Open-Plan Offices. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 97, 4 (July 2011), 641--655.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mack Hagood. 2011. Quiet comfort: Noise, otherness, and the mobile production of personal space. American Quarterly 63, 3 (2011), 573--589.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Edward T. Hall, Ray L. Birdwhistell, Bernhard Bock, Paul Bohannan, A. Richard Diebold, Marshall Durbin, Munro S. Edmonson, J. L. Fischer, Dell Hymes, Solon T. Kimball, Weston La Barre, J. E. McClellan, Donald S. Marshall, G. B. Milner, Harvey B. Sarles, George L Trager, and Andrew P. Vayda. 1968. Proxemics. Current Anthropology 9, 2/3 (April 1968), 83--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Harman and Silencio Films. 2015. HARMAN | Auditory Augmented Reality. (Jan. 2015). https://vimeo.com/115933849 Accessed: 10.9.2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Helena Jahncke, Patrik Björkeholm, John E. Marsh, Johan Odelius, and Patrik Sörqvist. 2016. Office noise: Can headphones and masking sound attenuate distraction by background speech? Work 55, 3 (2016), 505--513.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Wen Jiang, Fei Zhao, Nicola Guderley, and Vinaya Manchaiah. 2016. Daily music exposure dose and hearing problems using personal listening devices in adolescents and young adults: A systematic review. International Journal of Audiology 55, 4 (April 2016), 197--205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Katherine Kenna and Alex Ryan. 2016. Superhearo: Sensory Augmentation for Your Friendly Neighborhood Vigilante. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (UbiComp '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 481--486. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Aniket Kittur, Ed H. Chi, and Bongwon Suh. 2008. Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, Florence, Italy, 453--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Richard A. Krueger and Mary Anne Casey. 2014. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Richard Lichenstein, Daniel Clarence Smith, Jordan Lynne Ambrose, and Laurel Anne Moody. 2012. Headphone use and pedestrian injury and death in the United States: 2004-2011. Injury Prevention 18, 5 (Oct. 2012), 287--290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Robert W. Lindeman, Haruo Noma, and Paulo Goncalves de Barros. 2007. Hear-through and mic-through augmented reality: Using bone conduction to display spatialized audio. In Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2007. ISMAR 2007. 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 173--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Ling Ma, Ben Milner, and Dan Smith. 2006. Acoustic Environment Classification. ACM Trans. Speech Lang. Process. 3, 2 (July 2006), 1--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Aadil Mamuji, Roel Vertegaal, Changuk Sohn, and Daniel Cheng. 2005. Attentive Headphones: Augmenting Conversational Attention with a Real World TiVo. In Extended Abstracts of CHI, Vol. 5. ACM, Portland, Oregon, USA, 2223--.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Daniel McFarlane. 1999. Coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. In Human-computer interaction, INTERACT, Vol. 99. IOS Press, Edinburgh, UK, 295.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Paul Milgram and Fumio Kishino. 1994. A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems 77, 12 (1994), 1321--1329.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Joseph W. Newbold, Jacob Luton, Anna L. Cox, and Sandy J. J. Gould. 2017. Using Nature-based Soundscapes to Support Task Performance and Mood. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2802--2809. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Orosound SAS. 2018. Tilde Earphones - Experience Noise-Filtering Technology. (2018). https://www.orosound.com/tilde-earphones/ Accessed: 3.10.2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Amanda Petrusich. 2016. Headphones Everywhere. (July 2016). https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/headphones-everywhere Accessed: 18.9.2017, ISSN: 0028-792X.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Patrick Reinelt, Shewit Hadish, and Claus-Peter H. Ernst. 2016. How Design Influences Headphone Usage. In The Drivers of Wearable Device Usage. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 59--68. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-30376-5_6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Spencer Russell, Gershon Dublon, and Joseph A. Paradiso. 2016. HearThere: Networked Sensory Prosthetics Through Auditory Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 7th Augmented Human International Conference 2016 (AH '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 20, 8 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Michael Southworth. 1969. The Sonic Environment of Cities. Environment and Behavior 1, 1 (June 1969), 49--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Sundae Electronics LLC. 2018. SoundBrake - Make Your Headphones Smarter. (2018). https://www.sundaelectronics.com/ Accessed: 7.2.2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Rob Van Rijswijk and Jeroen Strijbos. 2013. Sounds in Your Pocket: Composing Live Soundscapes with an App. Leonardo Music Journal 23 (2013), 27--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Ken Vassie and Miles Richardson. 2017. Effect of self-adjustable masking noise on open-plan office worker's concentration, task performance and attitudes. Applied Acoustics 119 (2017), 119--127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Sungwook Yoon, Yangwon Lim, Hankyu Lim, and Hyenki Kim. 2012. Architecture of Automatic Warning System on Urgent Traffic situation for Headphone Users. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering 7, 2 (2012), 421--426.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Fan-Gang Zeng. 2016. Goodbye Google Glass, Hello Smart Earphones. The Hearing Journal 69, 12 (Dec. 2016), 6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Can't You Hear Me?: Investigating Personal Soundscape Curation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MUM '18: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
      November 2018
      548 pages
      ISBN:9781450365949
      DOI:10.1145/3282894

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 November 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      MUM '18 Paper Acceptance Rate37of82submissions,45%Overall Acceptance Rate190of465submissions,41%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader