skip to main content
10.1145/3284103.3284114acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Air Contaminant Dispersion Prediction by the Integration of the Neural Network and AermodSystem

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Air pollution caused by industrial production has become a serious problem for public health. This challenging problem promotes the development of the research in the air contaminant dispersion (ADS) prediction, for the management of the emission and leak accident. However, conventional ADS models can hardly meet the requirement of both accuracy and efficiency. The data model, like the artificial neural network (ANN) provides a feasible way of forecasting the dispersion with high accuracy and efficiency. However, the construction of the ANN for prediction needs plenty of data, which is impractical to obtain in most emission cases. To address this problem, an ADS simulation software AermodSystem is applied to build the simulated dispersion scenarios and provide synthetic dataset for the model training and test. Based on the synthetic data set, the ANN prediction model is established, and evaluated on the test set, as well as the Gaussian model. Further, these two models are served as the forward dispersion model and combined with the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) for source estimation. The results verify the effectiveness of the proposed model and indicate that the ANN together with the AermodSystem as the data generator is feasible in the air contaminant dispersion forecast and the source estimation of a particular case.

References

  1. BING, W., BINGZHEN, C., and JINSONG, Z., 2015. The real-time estimation of hazardous gas dispersion by the integration of gas detectors, neural network and gas dispersion models. Journal of Hazardous Materials 300, 20 (12/30/), 433--442.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. BOZNAR, M., LESJAK, M., and MLAKAR, P., 1993. A neural network-based method for short-term predictions of ambient SO2 concentrations in highly polluted industrial areas of complex terrain. Atmospheric Environment. Part B. Urban Atmosphere 27, 2 (1993/06/01/), 221--230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. BRIGGS, G.A., 1973. Diffusion estimation for small emissions. Preliminary report. Atmospheric Turbulence and Diffusion Laboratory; NOAA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. WILSON, J. and L. SAWFORD, B., 1996. Review of Lagrangian Stochastic Models for Trajectories in the Turbulent Atmosphere. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 78, 191--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. FENG, X., LI, Q., ZHU, Y., HOU, J., JIN, L., and WANG, J., 2015. Artificial neural networks forecasting of PM2.5 pollution using air mass trajectory based geographic model and wavelet transformation. Atmospheric Environment 107(2015/04/01/), 118--128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. FLESCH, T.K., WILSON, J.D., and YEE, E., 1995. Backward-time Lagrangian stochastic dipsersion models and their application to estimate gaseous emissions(1995-06-01).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. G. PERRY, S., CIMORELLI, A., PAINE, R., W. BRODE, R., C. WEIL, J., VENKATRAM, A., B. WILSON, R., F. LEE, R., AND, and D. PETERS, W., 2005. AERMOD: A Dispersion Model for Industrial Source Applications. Part II: Model Performance against 17 Field Study Databases.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. GARDNER, M.W. and DORLING, S.R., 1998. Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron)---a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences. Atmospheric Environment 32, 14 (1998/08/01/), 2627--2636.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. HANNA, S.R., BRIGGS, G.A., HOSKER, R.P., SMITH, J.S., UNITED STATES. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. OFFICE OF ENERGY, R., UNITED STATES. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. OFFICE OF, H., and ENVIRONMENTAL, R., 1982. Handbook on atmospheric diffusion. U.S. department of energy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. HUTCHINSON, M., OH, H., and CHEN, W.-H., 2017. A review of source term estimation methods for atmospheric dispersion events using static or mobile sensors. Information Fusion 36(7//), 130--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. KENNEDY, J., 1995. Particle swarm optimization. Proc. of 1995 IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Networks, (Perth, Australia), Nov. 27-Dec. 4(1995), 1942--1948.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. L. BARAD, M., 1958. Project Prairie Grass, a field program in diffusion. Air Force Cambridge Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. LAURET, P., HEYMES, F., APRIN, L., and JOHANNET, A., 2016. Atmospheric dispersion modeling using Artificial Neural Network based cellular automata. Environmental Modelling & Software 85(2016/11/01/), 56--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. LTD., H.S.A.T., 2018. Guide of the AermodSystem.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. MA, D., DENG, J., and ZHANG, Z., 2013. Comparison and improvements of optimization methods for gas emission source identification. Atmospheric Environment 81, Supplement C (2013/12/01/), 188--198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. MA, D. and ZHANG, Z., 2016. Contaminant dispersion prediction and source estimation with integrated Gaussian-machine learning network model for point source emission in atmosphere. Journal of Hazardous Materials 311(2016/07/05/), 237--245.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. PODNAR, D., KORAČIN, D., and PANORSKA, A., 2002. Application of artificial neural networks to modeling the transport and dispersion of tracers in complex terrain. Atmospheric Environment 36, 3 (2002/01/01/), 561--570.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. PONTIGGIA, M., DERUDI, M., BUSINI, V., and ROTA, R., 2009. Hazardous gas dispersion: A CFD model accounting for atmospheric stability classes. Journal of Hazardous Materials 171, 1 (2009/11/15/), 739--747.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. ROJAS, R., 1996. Neural networks: a systematic introduction. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. SO, W., KOO, J., SHIN, D., and SUP, Y.E., 2010. Optical Sensor and Neural Networks for Real-Time Monitoring and Estimation of Hazardous Gas Release Rate. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN 43, 8 (2010/12/01), 682--690.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. STEVEN HANNA, J.C., HELGE R.OLESEN, 2005. Indianapolis Tracer Data and Meteorological Data National Environmental Research Institute.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. WANG, R., CHEN, B., QIU, S., MA, L., ZHU, Z., WANG, Y., and QIU, X., 2018. Hazardous Source Estimation Using an Artificial Neural Network, Particle Swarm Optimization and a Simulated Annealing Algorithm. Atmosphere 9, 4, 119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. WANG, R., CHEN, B., QIU, S., ZHU, Z., and QIU, X., 2017. Hazard Source Estimation Based on the Integration of Atmospheric Dispersion Simulation and UAV Sensory System. In Modeling, Design and Simulation of Systems: 17th Asia Simulation Conference, AsiaSim 2017, Melaka, Malaysia, August 27 --- 29, 2017, Proceedings, Part I, M.S. MOHAMED ALI, H. WAHID, N.A. MOHD SUBHA, S. SAHLAN, M.A. MD. YUNUS and A.R. WAHAP Eds. Springer Singapore, Singapore, 494--504.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. WANG, R., CHEN, B., QIU, S., ZHU, Z., WANG, Y., WANG, Y., and QIU, X., 2018. Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Hazardous Gas Dispersion Prediction in Field Cases. International journal of environmental research and public health 15, 7, 1450.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. XING, J., LIU, Z., HUANG, P., FENG, C., ZHOU, Y., ZHANG, D., and WANG, F., 2013. Experimental and numerical study of the dispersion of carbon dioxide plume. Journal of Hazardous Materials 256-257(2013/07//), 40--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. YEGANEH, B., MOTLAGH, M.S.P., RASHIDI, Y., and KAMALAN, H., 2012. Prediction of CO concentrations based on a hybrid Partial Least Square and Support Vector Machine model. Atmospheric Environment 55(2012/08/01/), 357--365.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Air Contaminant Dispersion Prediction by the Integration of the Neural Network and AermodSystem

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      Safety and Resilience'18: Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Safety and Resilience
      November 2018
      129 pages
      ISBN:9781450360449
      DOI:10.1145/3284103

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 November 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Safety and Resilience'18 Paper Acceptance Rate22of38submissions,58%Overall Acceptance Rate22of38submissions,58%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader