skip to main content
10.1145/3286978.3287025acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobiquitousConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

BFound: Sensor Enhanced Localization for Internet of Things

Published:05 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Beacons, the backbone of the physical web and location-based services, are widely used to tag objects and places. However, as a beacon's wireless transmission is limited to a ranging technology, the localization information is only available when the beacon is nearby.

In this work, we propose BFound, a navigation and room level localization system that enable users to locate beacons within a building to the room level. The scheme is based on expanding the beacons' capability in two ways. First, the system builds upon crowdsourcing using data from smartphones carried by mobile users and infrastructure beacons to search for facilities within an area and navigate to the target region. Next, we utilize sensors on the beacons to further localize beacons to the room level.

In order to enable room level localization, the beacon's sensors are leveraged to generate a signature unique to the room it belongs. This is achieved using wavelet transform.

Evaluations show that BFound provides sufficient accuracy both for navigation as well as room level localization.

References

  1. Mike Addlesee, Rupert Curwen, Steve Hodges, Joe Newman, Pete Steggles, Andy Ward, and Andy Hopper. 2001. Implementing a sentient computing system. Computer 34, 8 (2001), 50--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Pavithra Babu. 2016. 10 Airports Using Beacons to Take Passenger Experience to the Next Level. https://goo.gl/HM8pGe.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. George Bebis, Aglika Gyaourova, Saurabh Singh, and Ioannis Pavlidis. 2006. Face recognition by fusing thermal infrared and visible imagery. Image and Vision Computing 24, 7 (2006), 727--742.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Krishna Chintalapudi, Anand Padmanabha Iyer, and Venkata N Padmanabhan. 2010. Indoor localization without the pain. In Proceedings of the sixteenth annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. ACM, 173--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jaewoo Chung, Matt Donahoe, Chris Schmandt, Ig-Jae Kim, Pedram Razavai, and Micaela Wiseman. 2011. Indoor location sensing using geo-magnetism. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. ACM, 141--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ionut Constandache, Xuan Bao, Martin Azizyan, and Romit Roy Choudhury. 2010. Did you see bob?: human localization using mobile phones. In Proceedings of the sixteenth annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. ACM, 149--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Google. 2016. Eddystone Protocol Specification. https://github.com/google/eddystone/blob/master/protocol-specification.md.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. GoogleMaps. 2016. Go inside with Indoor Maps. https://www.google.com/maps/about/partners/indoormaps/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ming-Shing Hsieh, Din-Chang Tseng, and Yong-Huai Huang. 2001. Hiding digital watermarks using multiresolution wavelet transform. IEEE Transactions on industrial electronics 48, 5 (2001), 875--882.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. iBeacon.com. 2016. What is IBeacon? A guide to beacons. http://www.ibeacon.com/what-is-ibeacon-a-guide-to-beacons/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. ibeacontrends.com. 2016. iBeacon Trends. http://www.ibeacontrends.com/category/case-study/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. National Instruments. 2015. Applications of Wavelet Transforms. http://www.ni.com/white-paper/3887/en/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Allied Business Intelligence. 2016. BLE Beacon Market Remains on Target to Break 400 Million Shipments in 2021. https://www.abiresearch.com/press/ble-beacon-market-remains-target-break-400-million/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Charles E Jacobs, Adam Finkelstein, and David H Salesin. 1995. Fast multiresolution image querying. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM, 277--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. K Kim and K Choi. 2014. Algorithm & SoC Design for Automotive Vision Systems. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ye-Sheng Kuo, Pat Pannuto, Ko-Jen Hsiao, and Prabal Dutta. 2014. Luxapose: Indoor positioning with mobile phones and visible light. In Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. ACM, 447--458. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Chengwen Luo, Hande Hong, and Mun Choon Chan. 2014. Piloc: A self-calibrating participatory indoor localization system. In Information Processing in Sensor Networks, IPSN-14 Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on. IEEE, 143--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Chengwen Luo, Hande Hong, Cheng Long, Kartik Sankaran, and Mun Choon Chan. 2015. iMap: Automatic Inference of Indoor Semantics Exploiting Opportunistic Smartphone Sensing. In IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication and Networking (SECON).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Samuel Madden. 2004. Intel Lab Data. http://db.csail.mit.edu/labdata/labdata.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Shubhi Mittal. 2016. 25 Retailers Nailing it with their Proximity Marketing Campaigns. https://blog.beaconstac.com/2016/02/25-retailers-nailing-it-with-their-proximity-marketing-campaigns/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kartik Muralidharan, Azeem Javed Khan, Archan Misra, Rajesh Krishna Balan, and Sharad Agarwal. 2014. Barometric phone sensors: More hype than hope!. In Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications. ACM, 12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Radius Networks. 2016. AltBeacon: The Open and Interoperable Proximity Beacon Specification. http://altbeacon.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. P Pahl and Padmanabhan VN RADAR. 2000. An In-Building RF-based User Location and Tracking System {C}. IEEE Communications Socienties 2 (2000), 775--784.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Anshul Rai, Krishna Kant Chintalapudi, Venkata N Padmanabhan, and Rijurekha Sen. 2012. Zee: zero-effort crowdsourcing for indoor localization. In Proceedings of the 18th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. ACM, 293--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. He Wang, Souvik Sen, Ahmed Elgohary, Moustafa Farid, Moustafa Youssef, and Romit Roy Choudhury. 2012. No need to war-drive: unsupervised indoor localization. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. ACM, 197--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Roy Want, Andy Hopper, Veronica Falcao, and Jonathan Gibbons. 1992. The active badge location system. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 10, 1 (1992), 91--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Han Xu, Zheng Yang, Zimu Zhou, Longfei Shangguan, Ke Yi, and Yunhao Liu. 2016. Indoor localization via multi-modal sensing on smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 208--219. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Zhice Yang, Zeyu Wang, Jiansong Zhang, Chenyu Huang, and Qian Zhang. 2015. Wearables can afford: Light-weight indoor positioning with visible light. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. ACM, 317--330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Yuanqing Zheng, Guobin Shen, Liqun Li, Chunshui Zhao, Mo Li, and Feng Zhao. 2014. Travi-navi: Self-deployable indoor navigation system. In Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. ACM, 471--482. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. BFound: Sensor Enhanced Localization for Internet of Things

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        MobiQuitous '18: Proceedings of the 15th EAI International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services
        November 2018
        490 pages
        ISBN:9781450360937
        DOI:10.1145/3286978

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 November 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate26of87submissions,30%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader