Robert Ball
ABSTRACT
Creating curriculum with an ever-changing student body is difficult. Faculty members in a given department will have different perspectives on the composition and academic needs of the student body based on their personal instructional experiences. We present an approach to curriculum development that is designed to be objective by performing a comprehensive analysis of the preparation of declared majors in Computer Science (CS) BS programs at two universities. Our strategy for improving curriculum is twofold. First, we analyze the characteristics and academic needs of the student body by using a statistical, machine learning approach, which involves examining institutional data and understanding what factors specifically affect graduation. Second, we use the results of the analysis as the basis for applying necessary changes to the curriculum in order to maximize graduation rates. To validate our approach, we analyzed two four-year open enrollment universities, which share many trends that help or hinder students' progress toward graduating. Finally, we describe proposed changes to both curriculum and faculty mindsets that are a result of our findings. Although the specifics of this study are applied only to CS majors, we believe that the methods outlined in this paper can be applied to any curriculum regardless of the major.
- Alvarado, C., & Dodds, Z. (2010). Women in CS: an evaluation of three promising practices. Proceedings of the 41st ACM tech. symposium on CS education, (pp. 57--61). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Attewell, P., Heil, S., & Reisel, L. (2011). Competing explanations of undergraduate noncompletion. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 536--559.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45, 5--32. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Crosling, G., Heagney, M., Thomas, L., & others. (2009). Improving student retention in higher education: Improving teaching and learning. Australian Universities' Review, 51, 9.Google Scholar
- Delen, D. (2010). A comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for student retention management. Decision Support Systems, 49, 498--506. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ishitani, T. T. (2006). Studying attrition and degree completion behavior among first-generation college students in the United States. The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 861--885.Google Scholar
- Jones-White, D. R., Radcliffe, P. M., Huesman, R. L., & Kellogg, J. P. (2010). Redefining student success: Applying different multinomial regression techniques for the study of student graduation across institutions of higher education. Research in Higher Education, 51, 154--174.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lykourentzou, I., Giannoukos, I., Nikolopoulos, V., Mpardis, G., & Loumos, V. (2009). Dropout prediction in e-learning courses through the combination of machine learning techniques. Computers & Education, 53, 950--965. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McFarland, J., Hussar, B., Brey, C., Snyder, T., Wang, X., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., . . . others. (2017). The Condition of Education 2017. NCES 2017--144.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, T. M. (1997). Machine Learning (1 ed.). New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O'Keeffe, P. (2013). A sense of belonging: Improving student retention. College Student Journal, 47, 605--613.Google Scholar
- Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., . . . Duchesnay, E. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825--2830. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peng, C.-Y. J., Lee, K. L., & Ingersoll, G. M. (2002). An Introduction to Logistic Regression Analysis and Reporting. The Journal of Educational Research, 96, 3--14.Google Scholar
- Porter, K. B. (2008). Current trends in student retention: A literature review. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 3, 3--5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rogulkin, D. (2011). Predicting 6-Year Graduation and High-Achieving and At-Risk Students. Online Submission.Google Scholar
- Warburton, E. C., Bugarin, R., & Nunez, A.-M. (2011). Bridging the Gap: Academic Preparation and Postsecondary Success of First-Generation Students. Statistical Analysis Report. Postsecondary Education Descriptive Analysis Reports.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Applying Machine Learning to Improve Curriculum Design
Recommendations
Data Science Curriculum Design: A Case Study
SIGCSE '21: Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationThere is an increasing demand for data scientists in the current job market. Hence, many two-year and four-year colleges and universities started to offer Data Science degrees in the recent decade. In this paper, we describe an undergraduate Data ...
Student Performance Prediction and Classification Using Machine Learning Algorithms
ICEIT 2019: Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Educational and Information TechnologyFor a productive and a good life, education is a necessity and it improves individuals' life with value and excellence. Also, education is considered a vital need for motivating self-assurance as well as providing the things are needed to partake in ...
A Robust Machine Learning Technique to Predict Low-performing Students
As enrollments and class sizes in postsecondary institutions have increased, instructors have sought automated and lightweight means to identify students who are at risk of performing poorly in a course. This identification must be performed early ...
Comments