skip to main content
10.1145/3287624.3288749acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaspdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Deep learning-based framework for comprehensive mask optimization

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 January 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the dramatically increase of design complexity and the advance of semiconductor technology nodes, huge difficulties appear during design for manufacturability with existing lithography solutions. Sub-resolution assist feature (SRAF) insertion and optical proximity correction (OPC) are both inevitable resolution enhancement techniques (RET) to maximize process window and ensure feature printability. Conventional model-based SRAF insertion and OPC methods are widely applied in industrial application but suffer from the extremely long runtime due to iterative optimization process. In this paper, we propose the first work developing a deep learning framework to simultaneously perform SRAF insertion and edge-based OPC. In addition, to make the optimized masks more reliable and convincing for industrial application, we employ a commercial lithography simulation tool to consider the quality of wafer image with various lithographic metrics. The effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed framework are demonstrated in experimental results, which also show the success of machine learning-based lithography optimization techniques for the current complex and large-scale circuit layouts.

References

  1. M. Abadi, P. Barham, J. Chen, Z. Chen, A. Davis, J. Dean et al., "TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning," in Proc. OSDI, pp. 265âĂŞ283, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Kuan-Jung Chen, Yu-Kai Chuang, Bo-Yi Yu and Shao-Yun Fang, "Minimizing cluster number with clip shifting in hotspot pattern classification," 2017 Design Automation Conference (DAC), pp. 1--6, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. N. Cobb, "Fast optical and process proximity correction algorithm for integrated circuit manufacturing," Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. F. Lie, C. Y. Huang, C. S. Wu, K. T. Chen and H. F. Kuo, "Demonstration of ACO-Based Freeform Source for ArF Laser Immersion Lithography System," in IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 6421--6428, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. H. Gabor, J. A. Bruce, W. Chu, R. A. Ferguson, C. A. Fonseca, R. L. Gordon, K. R. Jantzen, M. Khare, M. A. Lavin, W. Lee, L. W. Liebmann, K. P. Muller, J. H. Rankin, P. Varekamp, and F. X. Zach, "Subresolution assist feature implementation for high-performance logic gate-level lithography," in Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4691, pp. 418--425, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Gu and A. Zakhor, "Optical proximity correction with linear regression," IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 263--271, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Haoyu Yang, Shuhe Li, Yuzhe Ma, Bei Yu and Evangeline F. Y. Young, "GAN-OPC: Mask Optimization with Lithography-guided Generative Adversarial Nets," 2018 Design Automation Conference (DAC), Article No. 131, 2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S.-K. Kim, "Model-based OPC for resist reflow process," Digest of Papers Microprocesses and Nanotechnology, pp. 18--19, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. R. Luo, "Optical proximity correction using a multilayer perceptron neural network," Journal of Optics, vol. 15, no. 7, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. X. Ma and Y. Li, "Resolution enhancement optimization methods in optical lithography with improved manufacturability," Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS, vol. 10, no. 2, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. X. Ma, B. Wu, Z. Song, S. Jiang, and Y, Li, "Fast pixel-based optical proximity correction based on nonparametric kernel regression," Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS, vol. 13, no. 4, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. T. Matsunawa, B. Yu, D. Z. Pan, "Optical proximity correction with hierarchical bayes model," in Proceedings of SPIE, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. O. W. Otto, J. G. Garofalo, K. K. Low, C.-M. Yuan, R. C. Henderson, C. Pierrat, R. L. Kostelak, S. Vaidya, P. K. Vasudev, "Automated optical proximity correction: a rules-based approach," in Proceedings of SPIE, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J.-S. Park, C.-H. Park, S.-U. Rhie, Y.-H. Kim, M.-H. Yoo, J.-T Kong, H.-W. Kim, and S.-I. Yoo, "An efficient rule-based OPC approach using a DRC tool for 0.18 Îijm ASIC," in Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Y. Ping et al., "Process window enhancement using advanced RET techniques for 20nm contact layer," in Proceedings of SPIE, Art. no. 90521N, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. Schmidhuber. "Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overview. Neural Networks," Volume 61, Pages 85--117, January 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Y.-H. Su, Y.-C. Huang, L.-C. Tsai, Y.-W. Chang, and S. Banerjee, "Fast lithographic mask optimization considering process variation," IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1345--1357, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. K. Wong, "Resolution enhancement techniques in optical lithography," in Proceedings of SPIE, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. L. Yin, C. Wang, and L. Li, "Process window tripling by optimized SRAF placement rules: AP/DFM: Advanced patterning/design for manufacturability," in Annual SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference (ASMC), 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. X. Xu, Y, Lin, M. Li, T. Matsunawa, S. Nojima, C. Kodama, T. Kotani, and D. Z. Pan, "Sub-resolution assist feature generation with supervised data learning," IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. S. Banerjee, Z. Li, and S. R. Nassif, "ICCAD-2013 CAD contest in mask optimization and benchmark suite," in Proceedings of International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. KLA-Tencor PROLITH user guide. https://www.kla-tencor.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ASPDAC '19: Proceedings of the 24th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference
    January 2019
    794 pages
    ISBN:9781450360074
    DOI:10.1145/3287624

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 21 January 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate466of1,454submissions,32%

    Upcoming Conference

    ASPDAC '25

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader