skip to main content
10.1145/3290511.3290563acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicetcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring the factors driving impulse buying tendency on advertisements of Facebook: a social learning theory perspective

Published:26 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Nowadays, advertising on Facebook has grown into a highly popular marketing channel, resulting in how advertisements can capture users' attention becomes a vital issue for practitioners and researchers. This study aims to use the Social Learning Theory as a theoretical foundation to investigate how the social-feature factor, perceived herd behavior on Facebook advertisement, may serve as the external observational learning sources and how personal instant gratification need learned from impulse consumption may serve as the internal reinforcement learning sources. Moreover, how both learning sources tempt consumers' impulse buying tendency was also examined. The results showed that the numbers of "Like," "Share," and "Comment" on the advertisement of Facebook might become an effective observational learning source that triggers users to follow and imitate others' advertisement viewing behaviors. The results also indicated that instant gratification feeling learned from previous impulse buying can be a reinforcement learning source that becomes a durational inner stimulus of impulsive consumption. Moreover, this study further revealed that both perceived herd behavior and instant gratification would lead users to generate reactions of perceived usefulness and perceived enjoyment toward advertisements on Facebook News Feed, which in turn intensify their impulse buying tendency. Notably, both perceived herd behavior and instant gratification have greater influences on perceived usefulness than on perceived enjoyment, and perceived usefulness also has a greater influence on impulse buying tendency. Finally, the implications of the results were discussed.

References

  1. Ali, S. W., & Sudan, S. 2018. Influence of cultural factors on impulse buying tendency: A study of Indian consumers. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 22, 1, 68--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Amos, C., Holmes, G. R., & Keneson, W. C. 2014. A metaanalysis of consumer impulse buying. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21, 2, 86--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bandura, A. 1971. Social learning theory. NY: General Learning Cooperation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. 1986. A social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. 2001. Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Mediapsychology, 3, 265--299.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bayley, G., & Nancarrow, C. 1998. Impulse purchasing: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenon. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 1, 2, 99--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Chan, T. K. H., Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, Z. W. Y. 2017. The state of online impulse buying research: A literature analysis. Information & Management, 54, 2, 204--217. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chen, Y., Wang, Q., & Xie, J. 2011. Online social interactions: A natural experiment on word of mouth versus observational learning. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 2, 238--254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Cheung, C. M. K., Liu, I. L. B., & Lee, M. K. O. 2015. How online social interactions influence customer information contribution behavior in online social shopping communities: A social learning theory perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66, 12, 2511--2521. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Chu, S.-C., & Sung, Y. 2015. Using a consumer socialization framework to understand electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) group membership among brand followers on Twitter. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14, 4, 251--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Fornell, C., &Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equations with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 1, 39--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jones, M. A., Reynolds, K. E., Weun, S., & Beatty, S. E. 2013. The product-specific nature of impulse buying tendency. Journal of Business Research, 56, 7, 505--511.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Koufaris, M. 2002. Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research, 13, 2, 205--223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lee, J., & Hong, I. B. 2016. Predicting positive user responses to social media advertising: The roles of emotional appeal, informativeness, and creativity. International Journal of Information Management, 36, 3, 360--373. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Liu, Y., Li, H., & Hu, F. 2013. Website attributes in urging online impulse purchase: An empirical investigation on consumer perceptions. Decision Support Systems, 55, 829--837.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Madhavaram, Rao, S., & Laverie, D. A. 2004. Exploring impulse purchasing on the Internet. Advances in Consumer Research, 34, 1, 59--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Parboteeah, D. V., Valacich, J. S., & Wells, J. D. 2009. The influence of website characteristics on a consumer's urge to buy impulsively. Information Systems Research, 20, 1, 60--78 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Park, J., & Lennon, S. J. 2006. Psychological and environmental antecedents of impulse buying tendency in the multichannel shopping context. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23, 2, 56--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Slickdeals. 2018. Slickdeals shares new survey data showing Americans spend $324,000 on impulse buys in their lifetime.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Smart PLS 2.0_M3 Beta, H., 2005, http://www.smartpls.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Sun, T., & Wu, G. 2011. Trait predictors of online impulsive buying tendency: A hierarchical approach. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 3, 337--346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Chen, J. V., Su, B.-C., & Widjaja A. E. 2016. Facebook C2C social commerce: A study of online impulse buying. Decision Support Systems, 83, 1, 57--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Wang, X., Yu, C., & Wei, Y. 2012. Using a consumer socialization framework to understand electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) group membership among brand followers on Twitter. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26, 4, 198--208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Wu, Y.-W., Huang, C.-F., & Weng, K.-H. 2014. A study of an architecture design learning process based on social learning, course teaching, interaction, and analogical thinking. Mathematical Problems In Engineering, 2014, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Xiang, L., Zheng, X., Lee, M. K. O., & Zhao, D. 2016. Exploring consumers' impulse buying behavior on social commerce platform: The role of parasocial interaction. International Journal of Information Management, 36, 3, 333--347. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Zhang, K. Z. K., Hu, B., & Zhao, S. J. 2014. How online social interactions affect consumers' impulse purchase on group shopping websites? In Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Exploring the factors driving impulse buying tendency on advertisements of Facebook: a social learning theory perspective

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICETC '18: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers
      October 2018
      391 pages
      ISBN:9781450365178
      DOI:10.1145/3290511

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 October 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader