skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300443acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding and Modeling User-Perceived Brand Personality from Mobile Application UIs

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Designers strive to make their mobile apps stand out in a competitive market by creating a distinctive brand personality. However, it is unclear whether users can form a consistent impression of brand personality by looking at a few user interface (UI) screenshots in the app store, and if this process can be modeled computationally. To bridge this gap, we first collect crowd assessment on brand personalities depicted by the UIs of 318 applications, and statistically confirm that users can reach substantial agreement. To further model how users process mobile UI visually, we compute UI descriptors including Color, Organization, and Texture at both element and page levels. We feed these descriptors to a computational model, achieving a high accuracy of predicting perceived brand personality (MSE = 0.035 and R^2 = 0.78). This work could benefit designers by highlighting contributing visual factors to brand personality creation and providing quick, low-cost design feedback.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paper213.mp4

mp4

319.2 MB

References

  1. 2017. What it means to design with personality: 25 awesome case studies. https://www.canva.com/learn/graphic-art/. (September 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jennifer L. Aaker. 1997. Dimensions of Brand Personality. Journal of Marketing Research 34, 3 (1997), 347--356. http://www.jstor.org/stable/Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. F. Anvari, D. Richards, M. Hitchens, and M. A. Babar. 2015. Effectiveness of Persona with Personality Traits on Conceptual Design. In 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, Vol. 2. 263--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Jon R. Austin, Judy A. Siguaw, and Anna S. Mattila. 2003. A reexamination of the generalizability of the Aaker brand personality measurement framework. Journal of Strategic Marketing 11, 2 (2003), 77--92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Aditi Bajaj and Samuel D. Bond. 2018. Beyond Beauty: Design Symmetry and Brand Personality. Journal of Consumer Psychology 28, 1 (2018), 77--98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Michael Bauerly and Yili Liu. 2008. Effects of Symmetry and Number of Compositional Elements on Interface and Design Aesthetics. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 24, 3 (2008), 275--287.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Steven Bellman, Robert F. Potter, Shiree Treleaven-Hassard, Jennifer A. Robinson, and Duane Varan. 2011. The Effectiveness of Branded Mobile Phone Apps. Journal of Interactive Marketing 25, 4 (2011), 191 -- 200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Janneke Blijlevens, Marielle EH Creusen, and Jan PL Schoormans. 2009. How consumers perceive product appearance: The identification of three product appearance attributes. International Journal of design 3, 3 (2009), 27--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Leo Breiman. 2017. Classification and regression trees. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Chandrasekaran, A. K. Vijayakumar, S. Antol, M. Bansal, D. Batra, C. L. Zitnick, and D. Parikh. 2016. We are Humor Beings: Understanding and Predicting Visual Humor. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 4603--4612.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Chingching Chang. 2001. The impacts of personality differences on product evaluations. ACR North American Advances, 26--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Qimei Chen and Shelly Rodgers. 2006. Development of an Instrument to Measure Web Site Personality. Journal of Interactive Advertising 7, 1 (2006), 4--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Gianluigi Ciocca, Silvia Corchs, and Francesca Gasparini. 2015. Complexity Perception of Texture Images. In New Trends in Image Analysis and Processing -- ICIAP 2015 Workshops, Vittorio Murino, Enrico Puppo, Diego Sona, Marco Cristani, and Carlo Sansone (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 119--126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Josh Clark. 2010. Tapworthy : designing great iPhone apps. O'Reilly, Beijing Cambridge Mass. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Dianne Cyr. 2008. Modeling Web Site Design Across Cultures: Relationships to Trust, Satisfaction, and E-Loyalty. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 24, 4 (April 2008), 47--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Dianne Cyr, Milena Head, and Alex Ivanov. 2006. Design Aesthetics Leading to M-loyalty in Mobile Commerce. Inf. Manage. 43, 8 (Dec. 2006), 950--963. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Dianne Cyr, Milena Head, and Hector Larios. 2010. Colour Appeal in Website Design Within and Across Cultures: A Multi-method Evaluation. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 68, 1--2 (Jan. 2010), 1--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Biplab Deka, Zifeng Huang, Chad Franzen, Joshua Hibschman, Daniel Afergan, Yang Li, Jeffrey Nichols, and Ranjitha Kumar. 2017. Rico: A Mobile App Dataset for Building Data-Driven Design Applications. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 845--854. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Steven P. Dow, Kate Heddleston, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2009. The Efficacy of Prototyping Under Time Constraints. In Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 165--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. James Elkins. 2012. Art critiques : a guide. New Academia Publishing, Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Richard Elliott and Kritsadarat Wattanasuwan. 1998. Brands as symbolic resources for the construction of identity. International Journal of Advertising 17, 2 (1998), 131--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. M. Gygli, H. Grabner, H. Riemenschneider, F. Nater, and L. V. Gool. 2013. The Interestingness of Images. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 1633--1640. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Paul Heckbert. 1982. Color Image Quantization for Frame Buffer Display. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 16, 3 (July 1982), 297--307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Hervé Jégou, Matthijs Douze, Cordelia Schmid, and Patrick Pérez. 2010. Aggregating local descriptors into a compact image representation. In 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 3304--3311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Kevin Lane Keller and Keith Richey. 2006. The importance of corporate brand personality traits to a successful 21st century business. Journal of Brand Management 14, 1 (01 Sep 2006), 74--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Chung K. Kim, Dongchul Han, and Seung-Bae Park. 2001. The effect of brand personality and brand identification on brand loyalty: Applying the theory of social identification. Japanese Psychological Research 43, 4 (2001), 195--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Ramesh Kumar, Amit Luthra, and Gaurav Datta. 2006. Linkages between Brand Personality and Brand Loyalty: A Qualitative Study in an Emerging Market in the Indian Context. South Asian Journal of Management 13, 2 (Apr 2006), 11--35. https://search.proquest.com/ docview/222682394?accountid=29018Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Helmut Leder, Benno Belke, Andries Oeberst, and Dorothee Augustin. 2004. A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology 95, 4 (2004), 489--508.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Filip Lievens and Scott Highhouse. 2003. The Relation of Instrumental and Symbolic Attributes to a Company's Attractiveness as an Employer. Personnel Psychology 56 (03 2003), 75 -- 102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jianli Liu, Edwin Lughofer, and Xianyi Zeng. 2015. Aesthetic perception of visual textures: a holistic exploration using texture analysis, psychological experiment, and perception modeling. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 9 (2015), 134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. X. Liu, A. Xu, L. Gou, H. Liu, R. Akkiraju, and H. Shen. 2016. SocialBrands: Visual analysis of public perceptions of brands on social media. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST). 71--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Jana Machajdik and Allan Hanbury. 2010. Affective Image Classification Using Features Inspired by Psychology and Art Theory. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 83--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Natalia Maehle, Cele Otnes, and Magne Supphellen. 2011. Consumers' perceptions of the dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 10, 5 (09 2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Danaë Metaxa-Kakavouli, Kelly Wang, James A. Landay, and Jeff Hancock. 2018. Gender-Inclusive Design: Sense of Belonging and Bias in Web Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 614, 6 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Eleni Michailidou, Simon Harper, and Sean Bechhofer. 2008. Visual Complexity and Aesthetic Perception of Web Pages. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (SIGDOC '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 215--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Aliaksei Miniukovich and Antonella De Angeli. 2014. Visual Impressions of Mobile App Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (NordiCHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Aliaksei Miniukovich and Antonella De Angeli. 2015. Computation of Interface Aesthetics. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1163--1172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Aliaksei Miniukovich and Antonella De Angeli. 2016. Pick Me!: Getting Noticed on Google Play. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4622--4633. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Oded Nov, Ofer Arazy, Claudia López, and Peter Brusilovsky. 2013. Exploring Personality-targeted UI Design in Online Social Participation Systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 361--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Rodrigo De Oliveira, Mauro Cherubini, and Nuria Oliver. 2013. Influence of Personality on Satisfaction with Mobile Phone Services. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 2, Article 10 (May 2013), 23 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Su-e Park, Dongsung Choi, and Jinwoo Kim. 2005. Visualizing E-Brand Personality: Exploratory Studies on Visual Attributes and E-Brand Personalities in Korea. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 19, 1 (2005), 7--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Sampo V Paunonen. 2003. Big Five Factors of Personality and Replicated Predictions of Behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology 84 (03 2003), 411--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Fabian Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort, Vincent Michel, Bertrand Thirion, Olivier Grisel, Mathieu Blondel, Peter Prettenhofer, Ron Weiss, Vincent Dubourg, Jake Vanderplas, Alexandre Passos, David Cournapeau, Matthieu Brucher, Matthieu Perrot, and Édouard Duchesnay. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12 (Nov. 2011), 2825--2830. http://dl.acm.org/citation. cfm?id=1953048.2078195 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Amit Poddar, Naveen Donthu, and Jack Wei. 2009. Web site customer orientations, Web site quality, and purchase intentions: The role of Web site personality. Journal of Business Research 62, 4 (04 2009), 441--450.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Katharina Reinecke and Krzysztof Z. Gajos. 2014. Quantifying Visual Preferences Around the World. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Katharina Reinecke, Tom Yeh, Luke Miratrix, Rahmatri Mardiko, Yuechen Zhao, Jenny Liu, and Krzysztof Z. Gajos. 2013. Predicting Users' First Impressions of Website Aesthetics with a Quantification of Perceived Visual Complexity and Colorfulness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2049--2058. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. M Sirgy, Dhruv Grewal, and Tamara Mangleburg. 2000. Retail Environment, Self-Congruity, and Retail Patronage. Journal of Business Research 49, 2 (08 2000), 127--138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Alistair Sutcliffe. 2010. Designing for user engagement : aesthetic and attractive user interfaces. Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Patricia Valdez and Albert Mehrabian. 1994. Effects of color on emotions. Journal of experimental psychology: General 123, 4 (1994), 394-- 409.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Aarron Walter. 2011. Designing for emotion. A Book Apart/Jeffrey Zeldman, New York, N.Y.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Ou Wu, Weiming Hu, and Lei Shi. 2013. Measuring the Visual Complexities of Web Pages. ACM Trans. Web 7, 1, Article 1 (March 2013), 34 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Anbang Xu, Shih-Wen Huang, and Brian Bailey. 2014. Voyant: Generating Structured Feedback on Visual Designs Using a Crowd of Non-experts. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1433--1444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Anbang Xu, Haibin Liu, Liang Gou, Rama Akkiraju, Jalal Mahmud, Vibha Sinha, Yuheng Hu, and Mu Qiao. 2016. Predicting Perceived Brand Personality with Social Media. (2016). https://www.aaai.org/ ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM16/paper/view/13078Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Jingxian Zhang, Neel Kothari, Asad Imtiaz Butt, and Ranjitha Kumar. 2016. What Makes a Brand Look Expensive?. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3263--3268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Nanxuan Zhao, Ying Cao, and Rynson W. H. Lau. 2018. What Characterizes Personalities of Graphic Designs? ACM Trans. Graph. 37, 4, Article 116 (July 2018), 15 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Xianjun Sam Zheng, Ishani Chakraborty, James Jeng-Weei Lin, and Robert Rauschenberger. 2009. Correlating Low-level Image Statistics with Users - Rapid Aesthetic and Affective Judgments of Web Pages. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Nan Zhong and Florian Michahelles. 2013. Google Play is Not a Long Tail Market: An Empirical Analysis of App Adoption on the Google Play App Market. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 499--504. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Understanding and Modeling User-Perceived Brand Personality from Mobile Application UIs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2019
      9077 pages
      ISBN:9781450359702
      DOI:10.1145/3290605

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate703of2,958submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format