skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300725acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Examining the "Global" Language of Emojis: Designing for Cultural Representation

Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Emojis are becoming an increasingly popular mode of communication between individuals worldwide, with researchers claiming them to be a type of "ubiquitous language'' that can span different languages due to its pictorial nature. Our study uses a combination of methods to examine how emojis are adopted and perceived by individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds and 45 countries. Our survey and interview findings point to the existence of a cultural gap between user perceptions and the current emoji standard. Using participatory design, we sought to address this gap by designing 40 emojis and conducted another survey to evaluate their acceptability compared to existing Japanese emojis. We also draw on participant observation from a Unicode Consortium meeting on emoji addition. Our analysis leads us to discuss how emojis might be made more inclusive, diverse, and representative of the populations that use them.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paper495.mp4

mp4

254.5 MB

References

  1. Saeideh Bakhshi, David A. Shamma, Lyndon Kennedy, Yale Song, Paloma de Juan, and Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye. 2016. Fast, Cheap, and Good: Why Animated GIFs Engage Us. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 575--586. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Francesco Barbieri, German Kruszewski, Francesco Ronzano, and Horacio Saggion. 2016. How Cosmopolitan Are Emojis?: Exploring Emojis Usage and Meaning over Different Languages with Distributional Semantics. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Multimedia Conference (MM '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 531--535. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Elli Bourlai and Susan C. Herring. 2014. Multimodal Communication on Tumblr: "I Have So Many Feels!". In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on Web Science (WebSci '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 171--175. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Jeremy Burge. 2018. 2018: The Year of Emoji Convergence? (13 February 2018). https://blog.emojipedia.org/2018-the-year-of-emojiconvergence/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jeremy Burge. 2018. Apple Proposes New Accessibility Emojis. (23 March 2018). https://blog.emojipedia.org/apple-proposes-newaccessibility-emojis/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Christina Chaey. 2013. Are Emoji Racist? (22 August 2013). https: //www.fastcompany.com/3016256/are-emojis-racistGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Edwin Chan, Teddy Seyed, Wolfgang Stuerzlinger, Xing-Dong Yang, and Frank Maurer. 2016. User Elicitation on Single-hand Microgestures. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3403--3414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Emily Contois. 2017. From the Editor: Defining Food Studies and the Next Four Years. Graduate Journal of Food Studies 4, 1 (1 March 2017). https://gradfoodstudies.org/2017/03/01/from-the-editordefining-food-studies-and-the-next-four-years/Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Henriette Cramer, Paloma de Juan, and Joel Tetreault. 2016. Sender-intended Functions of Emojis in US Messaging. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 504--509. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Mark Davis and Peter Edberg. 2018. Unicode Technical Standard 51. (21 May 2018). http://unicode.org/reports/tr51/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Culture Decanted. 2014. Eating Yourself: We Consume Identity Through Food? (19 October 2014). https://culturedecanted.com/2014/10/19/eating-yourself-we-consume-identity-through-food/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Daantje Derks, Arjan E. R. Bos, and Jasper von Grumbkow. 2008. Emoticons in Computer-Mediated Communication: Social Motives and Social Context. CyberPsychology & Behavior 11, 1 (2008), 99--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Oxford Dictionaries. 2015. Announcing the Oxford Dictionaries "Word" of the Year 2015. (17 November 2015). https://www. oxforddictionaries.com/press/news/2016/9/2/WOTYGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Eli Dresner and Susan Herring. 2010. Functions of the Nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionary Force. 20 (07 2010), 249 -- 268.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. EmojiOne. 2017. Emoticons, Emojis and Stickers...Oh, My! (12 August 2017). https://www.emojione.com/blog/emoticons-emojis-andstickersoh-myGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Emojipedia. 2018. Person With Folded Hands Emoji. (2018). https://emojipedia.org/person-with-folded-hands/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Instagram Engineering. 2015. Emojineering Part 1: Machine Learning for Emoji Trends. (1 May 2015). https: //instagram-engineering.com/emojineering-part-1-machine-learningfor-emoji-trendsmachine-learning-for-emoji-trends-7f5f9cb979adGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jose A. Gallud, Habib M. Fardoun, Fernando Andres, and Nehme Safa. 2018. A Study on How Older People Use Emojis. In Proceedings of the XIX International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (Interacción 2018). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 20, 4 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lauren Gambino. 2014. Emoji to get some long-awaited diversity with new range of skin tones. (4 November 2014). https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/nov/04/emojis-diversity-skin-tonesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Leo A. Goodman. 1961. Snowball Sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32 1 (1961), 148--170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Google. 2018. Material Design. (2018). https://material.io/design/introduction/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Andy Holdeman. 2013. Why Are There No Black Emojis? (11 March 2013). https://mic.com/articles/29181/why-are-there-no-black-emojisGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jialun "Aaron" Jiang, Jed R. Brubaker, and Casey Fiesler. 2017. Understanding Diverse Interpretations of Animated GIFs. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1726--1732. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Victor Jupp. 2006. The SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods. SAGE Publications Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Heather Kelley. 2016. Apple replaces the pistol emoji with a water gun. (2 August 2016). https://money.cnn.com/2016/08/01/technology/applepistol-emoji/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ryan Kelly and Leon Watts. 2015. Characterising the inventive appropriation of emoji as relationally meaningful in mediated close personal relationships. Experiences of Technology Appropriation: Unanticipated Users, Usage, Circumstances, and Design ; Conference date: 20-09--2015 Through 20-09--2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sara Kiesler, Jane Siegel, and W. McGuire, Timothy. 1988. Computersupported Cooperative Work: A Book of Readings. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, Chapter Social Psychological Aspects of Computer-mediated Communication (Reprint), 657--682. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=49504.49528 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Ken Lo. 2016. A Brief History of Emoji: The New Language Of The Internet. (3 January 2016). https://community.giffgaff.com/t5/Blog/ABrief-History-of-Emoji-The-New-Language-Of-The-Internet/ba-p/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Shao-Kang Lo. 2008. The Nonverbal Communication Functions of Emoticons in Computer-Mediated Communication. CyberPsychology & Behavior 11, 5 (2008), 595--597.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Xuan Lu, Wei Ai, Xuanzhe Liu, Qian Li, Ning Wang, Gang Huang, and Qiaozhu Mei. 2016. Learning from the Ubiquitous Language: An Empirical Analysis of Emoji Usage of Smartphone Users. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 770--780. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Kris Markman and Sae Oshima. 2007. Pragmatic Play? Some Possible Functions of English Emoticons and Japanese Kaomoji in ComputerMediated Discourse. (18 October 2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Tim Futing Liao Michael S. Lewis-Beck, Alan Bryman. 2004. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods. SAGE Publications Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Hannah Miller, Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Shuo Chang, Isaac Johnson, Loren Terveen, and Brent Hecht. 2016. ""blissfully happy" or "ready to fight": Varying interpretations of emoji". In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web and Social Media, ICWSM 2016. https://experts.umn.edu/en/publications/blissfullyhappy-or-ready-to-fight-varying-interpretations-of-emoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Michael J. Muller. 2003. The Human-computer Interaction Handbook. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, USA, Chapter Participatory Design: The Third Space in HCI, 1051--1068. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=772072.772138Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Blanca Myers. 2017. Women and Minorities in Tech, By the Numbers. (27 March 2017). https://www.wired.com/story/computer-sciencegraduates-diversity/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Mamiko Nakano. 2015. Why and how I created emoji: Interview with Shigetaka Kurita. (2015). https://web.archive.org/web/20160610220635/http://ignition.co/105Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Yukiko Nishimura. 2016. A sociolinguistic analysis of emoticon usage in Japanese blogs: Variation by age, gender, and topic. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research 5 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Jaram Park, Vladimir Barash, Clay Fink, and Meeyoung Cha. 2013. Emoticon Style: Interpreting Differences in Emoticons Across Cultures. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM13/paper/view/6132Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Ella Peltonen, Eemil Lagerspetz, Jonatan Hamberg, Abhinav Mehrotra, Mirco Musolesi, Petteri Nurmi, and Sasu Tarkoma. 2018. The Hidden Image of Mobile Apps: Geographic, Demographic, and Cultural Factors in Mobile Usage. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 10, 12 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Henning Pohl, Christian Domin, and Michael Rohs. 2017. Beyond Just Text: Semantic Emoji Similarity Modeling to Support Expressive Communication. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 24, 1, Article 6 (March 2017), 42 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Marc Schenker. 2016. The Surprising History of Emojis. (11 October 2016). https://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2016/10/the-surprisinghistory-of-emojis/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Colette Shade. 2015. The Emoji Diversity Problem Goes Way Beyond Race. (11 November 2015). https://www.wired.com/2015/11/emojidiversity-politics-culture/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Irina Shklovski, Janet Vertesi, and Silvia Lindtner. 2014. Introduction to This Special Issue on Transnational HCI. Human-Computer Interaction 29, 1 (2014), 1--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Lee Sproull and Sara Kiesler. 1986. Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communications. Management Science 32, 11 (1986), 1492--1512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Nevana Stajcic. 2013. Understanding Culture: Food as a Means of Communication. Hemispheres. Studies on Cultures and Societies 28 (2013), 77--87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Satomi Sugiyama. 2015. Kawaii meiru and Maroyaka neko: Mobile emoji for relationship maintenance and aesthetic expressions among Japanese teens. First Monday 20, 10 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Selina Sutton and Shaun Lawson. 2017. A Provocation for Rethinking and Democratising Emoji Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Swiftkey. 2015. SwiftKey Emoji Report. (April 2015). https://www. scribd.com/doc/262594751/SwiftKey-Emoji-ReportGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Alex S. Taylor. 2011. Out There. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 685--694. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Lisa Collins Tidwell and Joseph B. Walther. 2002. Computer-Mediated Communication Effects on Disclosure, Impressions, and Interpersonal Evaluations: Getting To Know One Another a Bit at a Time. Human Communication Research 28, 3 (2002), 317. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/94063Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Garreth W. Tigwell and David R. Flatla. 2016. Oh That's What You Meant!: Reducing Emoji Misunderstanding. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (MobileHCI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 859--866. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Unicode. 2016. Proposed Draft UTS #52, Unicode Emoji Mechanisms. (20 May 2016). http://www.unicode.org/review/pri321/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Unicode. 2017. Proposed Update UTR #51, Unicode Emoji (Version 5.0). (30 January 2017). http://www.unicode.org/review/pri343/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Unicode. 2018. Emoji Ordering, v11.0. (9 August 2018). http://unicode.org/emoji/charts/emoji-ordering.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Unicode. 2018. Public Review Issues. (6 August 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Unicode. 2018. Selection Factors for Exclusion: Faulty Comparison. (2018). https://unicode.org/emoji/proposals.html#Faulty_ComparisonGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Unicode. 2018. Selection Factors for Exclusion: Overly Specific. (2018). https://unicode.org/emoji/proposals.html#SpecificGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Unicode. 2018. Selection Factors for Inclusion. (16 July 2018). https: //unicode.org/emoji/proposals.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Joseph B. Walther. 1993. Impression development in computer Rmediated interaction. Western Journal of Communication 57, 4 (1993), 381--398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Joseph B. Walther and Kyle P. D'Addario. 2001. The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication. Social Science Computer Review 19, 3 (2001), 324--347.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Anna Wiener. 2016. Why Can't Silicon Valley Solve Its Diversity Problem? (26 November 2016). https://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/why-cant-silicon-valley-solve-its-diversity-problemGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Sarah Wiseman and Sandy J. J. Gould. 2018. Repurposing Emoji for Personalised Communication: Why Means 'I Love You'. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 152, 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Rui Zhou, Jasmine Hentschel, and Neha Kumar. 2017. Goodbye Text, Hello Emoji: Mobile Communication on WeChat in China. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 748--759. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Examining the "Global" Language of Emojis: Designing for Cultural Representation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2019
      9077 pages
      ISBN:9781450359702
      DOI:10.1145/3290605

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate703of2,958submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format