skip to main content
10.1145/3291533.3291551acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An effective LA approach to predict student achievement

Published:29 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The domination of digital technology has expanded in the field of education and it is inevitably linked to e-learning methods. Learning management systems, as an integral part of distance learning infrastructure, support a global heterogeneous student population to interact with tutors, tools and applications. Exploitation and analysis of interaction data allow colleges to understand the differences in student learning progress and provide more personalized intervention. Implementation of learning analytics and machine learning tools can accurately predict students' achievements and failures. Early prediction could lead to prompt targeted action in order to improve learning outcomes.

This work proposes a learning analytics approach using data mining and machine learning to predict the grades of the four main assignments in an annual module of Hellenic Open University. By dividing the academic year into four periods, a data analysis workflow is developed to compare several regression algorithms to accurately predict students' marks for the assignments of each period. The paper concludes in the algorithm with the highest degree of precision that determines the predictability of the main written assignments. Subsequently, a statistical measure is applied to classify the influence of models' variables. In addition, the analytical framework provides a comparison of the actual and predicted values identifying students who have included third-party services in their assignments.

References

  1. M. T. Hora, J. Bouwma-Gearhart, & H. J. Park, (2017). Data driven decision-making in the era of accountability: Fostering faculty data cultures for learning. The Review of Higher Education, 40(3), 391--426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. K. Schildkamp, L. Karbautzki, & J. Vanhoof (2014). Exploring data use practices around Europe: Identifying enablers and barriers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 15--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. K. Daniel and B. (Ed). (2016). Big data and learning analytics in higher education: current theory and practice. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. W. You (2016). Identifying significant indicators using LMS data to predict course achievement in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 23--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. C. Gunn, (2014). Defining an agenda for learning analytics. In B. Hegary, J. Mc Donald & S.K. Loke (Eds), Rhetoric and Reality: Critical perspectives on educational technology, Proceedings ascilite Dudeding. pp 683--687.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Kalles, C. Pierrakeas, & M. Xenos, (2008). Intelligently Raising Academic Performance Alerts. In 1st International Workshop on Combinations of Intelligent Methods and Applications (CIMA), 18th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Patras, Greece (pp. 37--42).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C. Romero, M. López, J. Luna, & S. Ventura, (2013). Predicting students' final performance from participation in on-line discussion forums. Computers & Education, 68, 458--472.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. E. Lotsari, V. Verykios, C. Panagiotakopoulos, & D. Kalles, (2014). A learning analytics methodology for student profiling. In Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 300--312). Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. C. Romero, G. Espejo, A. Zafra, & J. Romero, & S. Ventura, (2013). Web usage mining for predicting marks of students that use Moodle courses. Computer Applications in Engineering Education. {15} Ian Editor (Ed.). 2018. The title of book two (2nd. ed.). University of XXX Press, City, Chapter 100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Amigud, J. Arnedo-Moreno, T. Daradoumis, & A. E. Guerrero-Roldan, (2017). Using learning analytics for preserving academic integrity. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Z. Papamitsiou, Z. & A. Economides, (2015). Temporal learning analytics visualizations for increasing awareness during assessment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 12(3), 129--147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. A. F. Gkontzis, C., Karachristos, F., Lazarinis, F., Stavropoulos, & V. S. Verykios, (2017). Assessing Student Performance by Learning Analytics Dashboards. In Proceedings of the ninth International Conference in Open & Distance Learning, 9(1A).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. A. Fynn, & J. Adamiak, (2018). A comparison of the utility of data mining algorithms in an open distance learning context. South African Journal of Higher Education, 32(4), 81 --95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. A. F. Gkontzis, C.V. Karachristos, C.T. Panagiotakopoulos, E. C. Stavropoulos and V. S. Verykios. (2017). "Sentiment Analysis to Track Emotion and Polarity in Student Fora". In Proceedings of the 21st Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics, 28--30 Sep, Larisa, Greece. ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. F. Gkontzis, S. Kontsiantis, C.T. Panagiotakopoulos and V. S. Verykios (2018). Measuring Engagement to Assess Performance of Students in Distance Learning. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications, 23 -- 25 July Zakynthos, Greece. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. J. Bayer, H. Bydzovská, J. Géryk, T. Obsivac, & L. Popelinsky, (2012). Predicting Drop-Out from Social Behaviour of Students. International Educational Data Mining Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M. Chen & C. Chen (2017). Detect Exam Cheating Pattern by Data Mining. Fuzzy Systems and Data Mining III: Proceedings of FSDM 2017, 299, 25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. A., Santana, E., de Barros Costa, B. F., dos Santos Neto, I. C. L., Silva, & J. B. Rego, (2015). A predictive model for identifying students with dropout profiles in online courses. In EDM (Workshops).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. A. Hirudkar & S. S. Sherekar (2013). Comparative Analysis of Data Mining Tools and Techniques for Evaluating Performance of Database System. International Journal Of Computer Science And Applications, 6(2), 223--237.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J. Demšar, T. Curk, A. Erjavec, Č. Gorup, T. Hočevar, M. Milutinovič, et al. (2013). Orange: data mining toolbox in python. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 14, 2349--2353. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. T. Devasia, T. P. Vinushree, & V. Hegde, (2016). Prediction of students performance using Educational Data Mining. In International Conference on Data Mining and Advanced Computing (SAPIENCE), pp. 91 --95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Leo Breiman (2001). Random Forests. Machine Learning. 45(1):5--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Yan, Xin (2009), Linear Regression Analysis: Theory and Computing, World Scientific. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Haykin, Simon (1998). Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation (2 ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-273350-1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Jerome H. Friedman. 2002. Stochastic gradient boosting. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 38, 4 (February 2002), 367--378. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. S.K. Shevade, S.S. Keerthi, C. Bhattacharyya, K.R.K. Murthy: Improvements to the SMO Algorithm for SVM Regression. In: IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. D. Aha, D. Kibler (1991). Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learning. 6:37--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. S. Kotsiantis, N. Tselios, A. Filippidi & V. Komis, (2013). Using learning analytics to identify successful learners in a blended learning course, International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning 5 (2), 133--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. J. Demšar, (2006). Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. Journal of Machine learning research, 7(Jan), 1 --30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. K. A. D'Souza and D. V. Siegfeldt, (2017).Empirical Research, Conceptual Framework for Detecting Cheating in Online and Take-Home Exams. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 15 (4), 370--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. G. Kostopoulos, S. Kotsiantis, & P. Pintelas, (2015). Predicting student performance in distance higher education using semi-supervised techniques. In Model and Data Engineering, pp. 259--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An effective LA approach to predict student achievement

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PCI '18: Proceedings of the 22nd Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics
      November 2018
      336 pages
      ISBN:9781450366106
      DOI:10.1145/3291533

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 November 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      PCI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate57of105submissions,54%Overall Acceptance Rate190of390submissions,49%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader