skip to main content
10.1145/3292147.3292160acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

What can speculative design teach us about designing for healthcare services?

Published:04 December 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Understanding patient needs is an important factor in the design of healthcare services, however ethnographic research methods can be intrusive in sensitive care settings and create privacy concerns such as when researching Type 2 diabetes. We offer the Fiction Probe as a contribution in the form of a field study tool that uses storytelling to allow patients to tell their story from their perspective. We used speculative design and the multi-choice narrative, represented as a pick-a-path storybook, to re-imagine the form and content of field study research tools. With our work, we hope to expand the range of methods used to understand patients in healthcare settings and to also inspire new ways of thinking about field study research tools in sensitive care settings, and more broadly, in ambiguous design contexts.

References

  1. Aaløkke, S., Corry, A., Kramp, G., (2007). Does It Work on Sundays Too? Healthcare Technology for Elderly People, <b>Third International Conference on Information Technology in Healthcare: Socio-technical approaches</b>, SydneyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bleecker, J., 2009. Design Fiction: A short essay on design, science, fact and fiction. <b>Near Future Laboratory</b>, pp. 29Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. <b>Design Issues</b>, 8(2), pp.5--21Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bullington, J., (2013), <b>The Expression of the Psychosomatic Body from a Phenomenological Perspective</b>, VII, Springer. p. 23--30Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Buxton, B., (2010). <b>Sketching user experiences: getting the design right and the right design.</b> Morgan Kaufmann Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Card, S K., Mackinkay, J D., Shneiderman, B., (1999) Readings in <b>Information Visualisation: Using Vision to Think</b>, San Francisco, CA, Morgan Kaufmann Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cottam, H. Leadbeater C., (2004). <b>Health: Co-Creating Services.</b> London: Design Council, Print. Red Paper 01Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., Rodden, T., Cheverst, K., Clarke, K., Dewsbury, G., Hughes, J. and Rouncefield, M. (2003). Designing with Care: Adapting Cultural Probe to Inform Design in Sensitive Settings. In: <b>Australian Computer-Human Interaction.</b> New York: ACM, pp.4--13Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaver, W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S. and Walker, B. (2004). Cultural Probes and the Value of Uncertainty. <b>Interactions</b>, 11(5), pp.53--56 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gaver, B., & Bowers, J. (2012). Annotated portfolios. <b>interactions, 19</b>(4), 40--49 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Giacomin, J., (2014). What is Human Centred Design? <b>The Design Journal. An International Journal for All Aspects of Design</b>, 17(4), pp.606--623Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lindley, J. and Coulton, P., (2015). Back to the future: 10 years of design fiction. In <b>Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference.</b> ACM. pp. 210--211 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Norman, D. and Verganti, R. (2014). Incremental and Radical Innovation: Design Research vs. Technology and Meaning Change. <b>Design Issues</b>, 30(1), pp.78--96Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Pirolli, P., Card, S., (2005). The Sensemaking Process and Leverage Points for Analyst Technology as Identified Through Cognitive Task Analysis: In: <b>Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligence Analysis</b>, pp. 2--4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sanders, E., Strappers, P., (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in co-designing. <b>CoDesign International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts</b>, 10(1), pp.5--14Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Schön, D. (1983). <b>The Reflective Practitioner.</b> New York: Basic BooksGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Spence, R., (2007). <b>Information visualization.</b> 2nd ed. Harlow: PearsonGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Stead, M. and Coulton, P., (2017). Old, Sick And No Health Insurance.: Will You Need A Permit To Use Your Home-made Health Wearable?. In <b>Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems</b> (pp. 101--105). ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sterling, B., (2009). Design fiction. <b>interactions, 16</b>(3), pp.20--24 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Stickdorn, M. and Schneider, J. ed., (2016). <b>This is Service Design Thinking.</b> 6th ed. Amsterdam: BIS, pp.14--30Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Swann, C. (2002). Action Research and the Practice of Design. <b>Design Issues</b>, 18(2), pp.49--61Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Weick, KE., Sutcliffe, KM., Obstfeld, D., (2005). Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking. <b>Organization Science</b>, 16(4): 409--421 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. World Health Organisation (2016). <b>Global Report on Diabetes.</b> Switzerland: WHO Press, pp.1--88Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. and Evenson, S., (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In <b>Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems</b> (pp. 493--502). ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. What can speculative design teach us about designing for healthcare services?

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        OzCHI '18: Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction
        December 2018
        639 pages
        ISBN:9781450361880
        DOI:10.1145/3292147

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 December 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader