skip to main content
10.1145/3297280.3297375acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A case-based approach using phonological knowledge for identifying error patterns in children's speech

Published:08 April 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) covers a range of different methods for organizing, retrieving, and indexing knowledge from previous cases. Thus, this methodology has been successfully applied in medical domain, due to its human and intelligent properties to diagnose the case of a patient. In the speech therapy domain, an early identification of speech sound disorders allows the diagnosis and treatment of various pathologies and may aid clinical decision-making. However, there are few proposals that use knowledge modeling for supporting speech therapists. Moreover, there is no indicative in related literature of CBR being used for detecting the phonological processes (PPs) that may occur in pronunciations. So, in this paper, we present a case-based approach that uses machine learning for predicting PPs, aiming to provide clinical support in the identification of error patterns in children's speech. The method was evaluated through a speech corpus containing near one hundred thousand audio files, collected from pronunciation assessments performed by speech-language pathologists with more than 1,000 children. Using our knowledge base along with incremental learning, we obtained an accuracy of over 93% for predicting the PPs, showing the efficiency of our method for clinical decision support.

References

  1. Agnar Aamodt and Enric Plaza. 1994. Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI communications 7, 1 (1994), 39--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alberto Abad, Anna Pompili, Angela Costa, Isabel Trancoso, José Fonseca, Gabriela Leal, Luisa Farrajota, and Isabel P Martins. 2013. Automatic word naming recognition for an on-line aphasia treatment system. Computer Speech & Language 27, 6 (2013), 1235--1248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Mobyen Uddin Ahmed, Shahina Begum, and Peter Funk. 2012. Case studies on the clinical applications using case-based reasoning. In Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), 2012 Federated Conference on. IEEE, 3--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Shahina Begum, Mobyen Uddin Ahmed, Peter Funk, Ning Xiong, and Mia Folke. 2011. Case-based reasoning systems in the health sciences: a survey of recent trends and developments. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 41, 4 (2011), 421--434. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Saroj Kr Biswas, Barnana Baruah, Nidul Sinha, and Biswajit Purkayastha. 2015. A hybrid CBR classification model by integrating ANN into CBR. International Journal of Services Technology and Management 21, 4-6 (2015), 272--293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Daniel Bolaños, Ronald A Cole, Wayne Ward, Eric Borts, and Edward Svirsky. 2011. FLORA: Fluent oral reading assessment of children's speech. ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing(TSLP) 7, 4 (2011), 16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Leo Breiman. 2001. Random forests. Machine learning 45, 1 (2001), 5--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Santiago-Omar Caballero-Morales and Felipe Trujillo-Romero. 2014. Evolutionary approach for integration of multiple pronunciation patterns for enhancement of dysarthric speech recognition. Expert Systems with Applications 41, 3 (2014), 841--852. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Marizete Ilha Ceron, Marileda Barichello Gubiani, Camila Rosa de Oliveira, and Márcia Keske-Soares. 2017. Factors Influencing Consonant Acquisition in Brazilian Portuguese-Speaking Children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 60, 4 (2017), 759--771.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Fanny Chuchuca-Méndez, Vladimir Robles-Bykbaev, Pablo Vanegas-Peralta, Juan Lucero-Saldaña, Martín López-Nores, and José Pazos-Arias. 2016. An educative environment based on ontologies and e-learning for training on design of speech-language therapy plans for children with disabilities and communication disorders. In Ciencias de la Informática y Desarrollos de Investigación (CACIDI), IEEE Congreso Argentino de. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Barbara Dodd and Teresa Lacano. 1989. Phonological disorders in children: Changes in phonological process use during treatment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 24, 3 (1989), 333--352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Maria Helena Franciscatto, Celio Trois, João Carlos Damasceno Lima, and Iara Augustin. in press. Blending Situation Awareness with machine learning to identify children's speech disorders. In 12th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies, AICT 2018, Almaty, Kazakhstan, October 17-19. IEEE, 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. André Grossinho, Isabel Guimaraes, Joao Magalhaes, and Sofia Cavaco. 2016. Robust phoneme recognition for a speech therapy environment. In Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH), 2016 IEEE International Conference on. 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Rocio Guillén and Rachel Usrey. 2005. Case based reasoning using speech data for clinical assessment. In International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems. Springer, 85--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Wahidah Husain and Lim Thean Pheng. 2010. The development of personalized wellness therapy recommender system using hybrid case-based reasoning. In Computer Technology and Development (ICCTD), 2010 2nd International Conference on. IEEE, 85--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. CoRR abs/1412.6980 (2014). arXiv:1412.6980 http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jong Yih Kuo, Hsiang-Fu Yu, Kevin Fong-Rey Liu, and Fang-Wen Lee. 2015. Multiagent cooperative learning strategies for pursuit-evasion games. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2015 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hyun Jung Lee and Hee Sun Kim. 2015. eHealth Recommendation service system using ontology and case-based reasoning. In Smart City/SocialCom/SustainCom (SmartCity), 2015 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 1108--1113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. María Luisa Martín-Ruiz, Miguel Angel Valero Duboy, and Iván Pau de la Cruz. 2013. Deployment and validation of a smart system for screening of language disorders in primary care. Sensors 13, 6 (2013), 7522--7545.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. B Nithya and V Ilango. 2017. Predictive analytics in health care using machine learning tools and techniques. In Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS), 2017 International Conference on. IEEE, 492--499.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Timo Ojala, Matti Pietikainen, and Topi Maenpaa. 2002. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 24, 7 (2002), 971--987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Valliappan Raman, Putra Sumari, JR Lekha, et al. 2010. Performance based CBR mass detection in mammograms. In Communication Control and Computing Technologies (ICCCCT), 2010 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 565--568.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Christopher K Riesbeck and Roger C Schank. 1989. Inside case-based reasoning. Erlbaum, Northvale, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. David Stampe. 1979. A dissertation on natural phonology. Ph.D. Dissertation. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Philip H Swain and Hans Hauska. 1977. The decision tree classifier: Design and potential. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Electronics 15, 3 (1977), 142--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Ian Watson. 1999. Case-based reasoning is a methodology not a technology. Knowledge-based systems 12, 5 (1999), 303--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Mehmet Yavas and Regina Lamprecht. 1988. Processes and intelligibility in disordered phonology. Clinical linguistics & phonetics 2, 4 (1988), 329--345.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Min-Ling Zhang and Zhi-Hua Zhou. 2007. ML-KNN: A lazy learning approach to multi-label learning. Pattern recognition 40, 7 (2007), 2038--2048. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Tong Zhang. 2004. Solving Large Scale Linear Prediction Problems Using Stochastic Gradient Descent Algorithms. In ICML 2004: PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING. OMNIPRESS. 919--926. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A case-based approach using phonological knowledge for identifying error patterns in children's speech

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SAC '19: Proceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
          April 2019
          2682 pages
          ISBN:9781450359337
          DOI:10.1145/3297280

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 8 April 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader