skip to main content
research-article

A Multi-View–Based Collective Entity Linking Method

Published:06 February 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Facing lots of name mentions appearing on the web, entity linking is essential for many information processing applications. To improve linking accuracy, the relations between entities are usually considered in the linking process. This kind of method is called collective entity linking and can obtain high-quality results. There are two kinds of information helpful to reveal the relations between entities, i.e., contextual information and structural information of entities. Most traditional collective entity linking methods consider them separately. In fact, these two kinds of information represent entities from specific and diverse views and can enhance each other, respectively. Besides, if we look into each view closely, it can be separated into sub-views that are more meaningful. For this reason, this article proposes a multi-view–based collective entity linking algorithm, which combines several views of entities into an objective function for entity linking. The importance of each view can be valued and the linking results can be obtained along with resolving this objective function. Experimental results demonstrate that our linking algorithm can acquire higher accuracy than many state-of-the-art entity linking methods. Besides, since we simplify the entity's structure and change the entity linking to a sub-matrix searching problem, our algorithm also obtains high efficiency.

References

  1. O. Benjelloun, H. Garcia-Molina, D. Menestrina, Q. Su, S. E. Whang, and J. Widom. 2009. Swoosh: A generic approach to entity resolution. Int. J. Very Large Data Bases 18, 1 (2009), 255--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Blanco, G. Ottaviano, and E. Meij. 2015. Fast and space-efficient entity linking in queries. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, Shanghai, China, 179--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. Burdick, R. Fagin, P. G. Kolaitis, L. Popa, and W.-C. Tan. 2016. A declarative framework for linking entities. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 41, 3 (2016), 17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. Ceccarelli, C. Lucchese, S. Orlando, R. Perego, and S. Trani. 2013. Learning relatedness measures for entity linking. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, New York, NY, 139--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. X. Dong, A. Y. Halevy, and J. Madhavan. 2005. Reference reconciliation in complex information spaces. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. ACM, New York, 85--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Daiber, M. Jakob, C. Hokamp, and P. N. Mendes. 2013. Improving efficiency and accuracy in multilingual entity extraction. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Semantic Systems. ACM, New York, 121--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. G. David, T. Manos, W. Wouter, M. Edgar, and R. D. Maarten. 2016. Dynamic collective entity representations for entity ranking. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, New York, 595--604. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Erwan, Y. Francois, and C. Olivier. 2008. Robust similarity measures for named entities matching. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics. ACL, Manchester, UK, 593--600. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Z. Guo and D. Barbosa. 2014. Robust entity linking via random walks. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 499--508. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Z. Guo and D. Barbosa. 2014. Entity linking with a unified semantic representation. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, New York, 1305--1310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. Graus, M. Tsagkias, W. Weerkamp, E. Meij, and M. D. Rijke. 2016. Dynamic collective entity representations for entity ranking. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, New York, 595--604. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. B. Hachey, W. Radford, and J. R. Curran. 2011. Graph-based named entity linking with Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Web Information System Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 213--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. X. P. Han, L. Sun, and J. Zhao. 2011. Collective entity linking in web text: A graph-based method. In Proceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, New York, 765--774. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Hoffart, M. A. Yosef, I. Bordino, H. Fürstenau, M. Pinkal, M. Spaniol, B. Taneva, S. Thater, and G. Weikum. 2011. Robust disambiguation of named entities in text. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. ACL, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 782--792. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Hoffart, S. Seufert, D. B. Nguyen, M. Theobald, and G. Weikum. 2012. KORE: Keyphrase overlap relatedness for entity disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, New York, 545--554. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. B. Hachey, W. Radford, J. Nothman, M. Honnibal, and J. R. Curran. 2013. Evaluating entity linking with Wikipedia. Artificial Intelligence 194, 1 (2013), 130--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Z. Y. He, S. J. Liu, M. Li, M. Zhou, L. K. Zhang, and H. F. Wang. 2013. Learning entity representation for entity disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. ACL, Stroudsburg, PA, 30--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Z. Y. He, S. J. Liu, Y. Song, M. Li, M. Zhou, and H. F. Wang. 2013. Efficient collective entity linking with stacking. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. ACL, Stroudsburg, PA, 426--435.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. J. Hoffart, Y. Altun, and G. Weikum. 2014. Discovering emerging entities with ambiguous names. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, New York, 385--396. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. H. Ji, J. Nothman, and B. Hachey. 2014. Overview of TAC-KBP 2014 entity discovery and linking tasks. In Proceedings of the Text Analysis Conference. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. S. Kulkarni, A. Singh, G. Ramakrishnan, and S. Chakrabarti. 2009. Collective annotation of Wikipedia entities in web text. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, New York, 457--466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Y. Li, D. McLean, Z. A. Bandar, J. D. O'Shea, and K. Crockett. 2006. Sentence similarity based on semantic nets and corpus statistics. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 18, 8 (2006), 1138--1150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. G. Luo, X. J. Huang, C. Y. Lin, and Z. Q. Nie. 2015. Joint entity recognition and disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. ACL, 879--888.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. E. Meij, K. Balog, and D. Odijk. 2013. Entity linking and retrieval. In Proceedings of the 37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, New York, 1127--1127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. A. Moro, A. Raganato, R. Navigli, and A. Raganato. 2014. Entity linking meets word sense disambiguation: A unified approach. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Ling. 2, 1 (2014), 231--244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. F. L. Matthew, D. Greg, and K. Dan. 2016. Capturing semantic similarity for entity linking with convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. ACL, San Diego, CA, 1256--1261.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. A.-C. N. Ngomo and S. Auer. 2011. LIMES: A time-efficient approach for large-scale link discovery on the web of data. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI, Palo Alto, CA. 2312--2317. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Z. Q. Nie, J. R. Wen, and W. Y. Ma. 2012. Statistical entity extraction from the web. Proceedings of the IEEE 100, 9 (2012), 2675--2687.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. E. S. Ristad and P. N. Yianilos. 1998. Learning string-edit distance. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20, 5 (1998), 522--532. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. B. Steffen and S. Tobias. 2004. Multi-view clustering. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE, 19--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. P. Sen. 2012. Collective context-aware topic models for entity disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, New York, 729--738. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. W. Shen, J. W. Han, and J. Y. Wang. 2014. A probabilistic model for linking named entities in web text with heterogeneous information networks. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. ACM, New York, 1199--1210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Y. M. Sun, L. Lin, D. Y. Tang, N. Yang, Z. Z. Ji, and X. L. Wang. 2015. Modeling mention, context and entity with neural networks for entity disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI, 1333--1339. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. W. Shen, J. Y. Wang, and J. W. Han. 2015. Entity linking with a knowledge base: Issues, techniques, and solutions. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 27, 2 (2015), 443--460.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. R. Usbeck, A.-C. N. Ngomo, M. Röder, D. Gerber, S. A. Coelho, S. Auer, and A. Both. 2014. AGDISTIS-Agnostic disambiguation of named entities using linked open data. In Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI, 1113--1114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. J. Volz, C. Bizer, M. Gaedke, and G. Kobilarov. 2009. Discovering and maintaining links on the web of data. In Proceedings of the 8th International Semantic Web Conference. SWSA, Karlsruhe, Germany, 650--665. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Q. Wang, M. Y. Cui, and H. Z. Liang. 2016. Semantic-aware blocking for entity resolution. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 28, 1 (2016), 166--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Z. C. Zheng, F. T. Li, M. L. Huang, and X. Y. Zhu. 2010. Learning to link entities with knowledge base. In Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL. ACL, Stroudsburg, PA, 483--491. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. L. Zhang, Y. Dong, and A. Rettinger. 2015. Towards entity correctness, completeness and emergence for entity recognition. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, New York, 143--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. S. Zwicklbauer, C. Seifert, and M. Granitzer. 2016. Robust and collective entity disambiguation through semantic embeddings. In Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, New York, 425--434. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Multi-View–Based Collective Entity Linking Method

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Information Systems
        ACM Transactions on Information Systems  Volume 37, Issue 2
        April 2019
        410 pages
        ISSN:1046-8188
        EISSN:1558-2868
        DOI:10.1145/3306215
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 February 2019
        • Accepted: 1 December 2018
        • Revised: 1 October 2018
        • Received: 1 February 2018
        Published in tois Volume 37, Issue 2

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format