skip to main content
10.1145/3302506.3310384acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Recovering bits from thin air: demodulation of bandpass sampled noisy signals for space IoT

Published:16 April 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Two nanosatellites recently launched into space had issues with respect to its stabilization, power and orientation. The signals were intermittent, and amateur radio enthusiasts around the globe were requested to observe the satellites so as to get their health information. As decoding the received signals required proprietary hardware (that could not be sent to everyone), amateur radio receivers recorded the signal using Software Defined Radios (SDRs) and sub-sampled the carrier signals to make it easy to share. The captured signals, modulated using binary Frequency Shift Keying (FSK), included noise and more importantly the frequency shifts due to Doppler, caused by the speed of the satellites (of about 7.8 km/s), thus making decoding a major challenge even for the designated proprietary receivers (failed in some cases). As the existing FSK methods did not work effectively, we were motivated by this challenge to design an effective FSK decoder that works in the presence of Doppler and noise. In this paper, we propose Teager Energy Decoder (TED) based on Teager Energy Operator to decode such Doppler and noise influenced sub-sampled data. TED does not need any Doppler correction mechanisms and can dynamically adapt to the changing frequency shifts. We evaluate TED using simulation as well as from the signals from those two satellites. We show that TED performs better than COTS transceivers and available GNU-radio-based solutions using SDRs. TED is low-complexity algorithm, O(N2), and has been prototyped on a low-power micro-controller. TED can be easily adopted on satellites to decode signals for space Internet of Things applications.

References

  1. Airspy. 2018. SDR Sharp. https://airspy.com/download/ {Online; accessed 01-Feb-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. I. Ali, P. G. Bonanni, N. Al-Dhahir, and J. E. Hershey. 2002. Doppler Applications in LEO Satellite Communication Systems. Vol. 656. Springer US, Boston, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. K. Banerjee and N. B. Chakrabarti. 2015. Noise sensitivity of Teager-Kaiser energy operators and their ratios. In 2015 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI). 2265--2271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. E. Booth. 2004. A Doppler Compensation Scheme for RF Communications Useable on Dynamically Retargeted Projectiles. In Proceedings for the 24th Army Science Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. G. Boudouris. 1960. A method for interpreting the doppler curves of artificial satellites. Radio Engineers, Journal of the British Institution of 20, 12 (December 1960), 933--935.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J Bouwmeester and J Guo. 2010. Survey of worldwide pico and nanosatellite missions, distributions and subsystem technology. In Acta Astronautica, Volume 67. Acta Astronautica, 854--862.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. K. S. Gomadam and S. A. Jafar. 2007. Modulation and Detection for Simple Receivers in Rapidly Time-Varying Channels. IEEE Transactions on Communications 55, 3 (March 2007), 529--539.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. GPredict. 2018. Gpredict:Free, Real-Time Satellite Tracking and Orbit Prediction Software. http://gpredict.oz9aec.net/ {Online; accessed 01-Feb-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D.A. Guimaraes and R.A.A. de Souza. 2015. Exploring Practical Aspects of the FSK Modulation with Non-Coherent Matched Filter Detection. Revista de Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação (RTIC) 5, 1 (May 2015), 22--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Hara, A. Wannasarnmaytha, Y. Tsuchida, and N. Morinaga. 1997. A novel FSK demodulation method using short-time DFT analysis for LEO satellite communication systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 46, 3 (Aug 1997).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Hiber. 2018. Introducing Hiberband. https://hiber.global/ {Online; accessed 01-Feb-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. IoTEE. 2018. Internet of Things Everywhere on Earth: a satellite based M2M solution. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/207924_en.html {Online; accessed 01-Feb-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. James F. Kaiser. 1993. Some Useful Properties of Teager's Energy Operators. In Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing: Digital Speech Processing - Volume III (ICASSP'93). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 149--152. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1946773.1946815 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R. Lerner. 1960. A matched filter detection system for complicated Doppler shifted signals. IRE Transactions on Information Theory 6, 3 (June 1960), 373--385.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. Narayana, R. Venkatesha Prasad, V. S. Rao, and C. Verhoeven. 2017. SWANS: Sensor Wireless Actuator Network in Space. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems (SenSys '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 23, 6 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. W. R. Remley. 1966. Doppler dispersion effects in matched filter detection and resolution. Proc. IEEE 54, 1 (Jan 1966), 33--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. B. Sklar. 2018. Digital Communications. http://userspages.uob.edu.bh/mangoud/mohab/Courses_files/sklar.pdf {Online; accessed 01-Feb-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lacuna space. 2018. Lacuna - Low-cost, simple and reliable global connections to sensors and mobile equipment. https://lacuna.space/ {Online; accessed 01-Feb-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. A. Vahter. 2017. cubehub. https://github.com/cubehub/demod. {Online; accessed 01-Feb-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Recovering bits from thin air: demodulation of bandpass sampled noisy signals for space IoT

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        IPSN '19: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks
        April 2019
        365 pages
        ISBN:9781450362849
        DOI:10.1145/3302506

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 16 April 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        IPSN '19 Paper Acceptance Rate25of91submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate143of593submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader