skip to main content
10.1145/3304221.3319742acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Visual Portrayals of Data and Results at ITiCSE

Published:02 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present an analysis of the visual portrayals of data (including results) in the full papers and working group reports of ITiCSE from 2013 to 2018. We find that tables are the most common visual portrayal of data in these publications, but that a number of graphical forms are also widely used. We examine the quality of the data portrayals for tables, graphs, and images using visual quality indicators derived from the literature. Overall, our findings are not positive. We find that many papers present data in such a way that it cannot be readily interpreted. The most common problem is captions that do not adequately describe the table, figure, or image. In tables, the main issues affecting readability of numeric data are poor alignment of numbers within a column, unnecessary notations, and unwarranted precision. In graphs and images, the prevalent problem is text that is too small to be read. We conclude with guidelines for future authors to ITiCSE and other computing education venues, in the hope that we can contribute to an improvement in the quality of computing education publications.

References

  1. Cambridge Dictionary (online). 2019. Definition of “diagram” - English Dictionary . (2019). https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/diagram Accessed 21 Jan 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jennifer C Chen, Richelle J Cooper, Michael E McMullen, and David L Schriger. 2017. Graph Quality in Top Medical Journals. Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 69, 4 (April 2017), 453--461.e5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. William S Cleveland. 1984. Graphs in Scientific Publications. The American Statistician, Vol. 38 (November 1984), 261--269. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2683400Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Richelle J Cooper, David L Schriger, and David A Tashman. 2001. An Evaluation of the Graphical Literacy of Annals of Emergency Medicine. Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 37, 1 (January 2001), 13--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Charles G Durbin. 2004. Effective Use of Tables and Figures in Abstracts, Presentations, and Papers. Respiratory Care, Vol. 49, 10 (2004), 1233. http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/49/10/1233.abstractGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Lauren E Franzblau and Kevin C Chung. 2012. Graphs, Tables, and Figures in Scientific Publications: The Good, the Bad, and How Not to Be the Latter. Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 37 (March 2012), 591--596.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. D Kelly, J Jasperse, and I Westbrooke. 2005. Designing Science Graphs for Data Analysis and Presentation: the Bad, the Good and the Better . Department of Conservation Technical Series 32. New Zealand Department of Conservation, Wellington.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. McKenzie O'Shea. 2012. Writing for Psychology 6th ed.). Cengage Learning Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Rodrigo Pereira Duquia, Jo ao Luiz Bastos, Renan Rangel Bonamigo, David Alejandro González-Chica, and Jeovany Mart'inez-Mesa. 2014. Presenting Data in Tables and Charts. Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, Vol. 89, 2 (2014), 280--285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. David L Schriger and Richelle J Cooper. 2001. Achieving Graphical Excellence: Suggestions and Methods for Creating High-Quality Visual Displays of Experimental Data. Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 37, 1 (January 2001), 75--87.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. David J Slutsky. 2014. The Effective Use of Graphs. Journal of Wrist Surgery, Vol. 3, 2 (2014), 67--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE. 2009. Making Data Meaningful Part 2: a Guide to Presenting Statistics. (2009). http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/writing/MDM_Part2_English.pdf Accessed 7 Jan 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Howard Wainer. 1984. How to Display Data Badly. The American Statistician, Vol. 38, 2 (May 1984), 137--147. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2683253Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Visual Portrayals of Data and Results at ITiCSE

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ITiCSE '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
      July 2019
      583 pages
      ISBN:9781450368957
      DOI:10.1145/3304221

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 July 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate552of1,613submissions,34%

      Upcoming Conference

      ITiCSE 2024

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader