ABSTRACT
We present an analysis of the visual portrayals of data (including results) in the full papers and working group reports of ITiCSE from 2013 to 2018. We find that tables are the most common visual portrayal of data in these publications, but that a number of graphical forms are also widely used. We examine the quality of the data portrayals for tables, graphs, and images using visual quality indicators derived from the literature. Overall, our findings are not positive. We find that many papers present data in such a way that it cannot be readily interpreted. The most common problem is captions that do not adequately describe the table, figure, or image. In tables, the main issues affecting readability of numeric data are poor alignment of numbers within a column, unnecessary notations, and unwarranted precision. In graphs and images, the prevalent problem is text that is too small to be read. We conclude with guidelines for future authors to ITiCSE and other computing education venues, in the hope that we can contribute to an improvement in the quality of computing education publications.
- Cambridge Dictionary (online). 2019. Definition of “diagram” - English Dictionary . (2019). https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/diagram Accessed 21 Jan 2019.Google Scholar
- Jennifer C Chen, Richelle J Cooper, Michael E McMullen, and David L Schriger. 2017. Graph Quality in Top Medical Journals. Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 69, 4 (April 2017), 453--461.e5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- William S Cleveland. 1984. Graphs in Scientific Publications. The American Statistician, Vol. 38 (November 1984), 261--269. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2683400Google Scholar
- Richelle J Cooper, David L Schriger, and David A Tashman. 2001. An Evaluation of the Graphical Literacy of Annals of Emergency Medicine. Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 37, 1 (January 2001), 13--19.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Charles G Durbin. 2004. Effective Use of Tables and Figures in Abstracts, Presentations, and Papers. Respiratory Care, Vol. 49, 10 (2004), 1233. http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/49/10/1233.abstractGoogle Scholar
- Lauren E Franzblau and Kevin C Chung. 2012. Graphs, Tables, and Figures in Scientific Publications: The Good, the Bad, and How Not to Be the Latter. Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 37 (March 2012), 591--596.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D Kelly, J Jasperse, and I Westbrooke. 2005. Designing Science Graphs for Data Analysis and Presentation: the Bad, the Good and the Better . Department of Conservation Technical Series 32. New Zealand Department of Conservation, Wellington.Google Scholar
- McKenzie O'Shea. 2012. Writing for Psychology 6th ed.). Cengage Learning Australia.Google Scholar
- Rodrigo Pereira Duquia, Jo ao Luiz Bastos, Renan Rangel Bonamigo, David Alejandro González-Chica, and Jeovany Mart'inez-Mesa. 2014. Presenting Data in Tables and Charts. Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, Vol. 89, 2 (2014), 280--285.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David L Schriger and Richelle J Cooper. 2001. Achieving Graphical Excellence: Suggestions and Methods for Creating High-Quality Visual Displays of Experimental Data. Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 37, 1 (January 2001), 75--87.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David J Slutsky. 2014. The Effective Use of Graphs. Journal of Wrist Surgery, Vol. 3, 2 (2014), 67--68.Google ScholarCross Ref
- United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE. 2009. Making Data Meaningful Part 2: a Guide to Presenting Statistics. (2009). http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/writing/MDM_Part2_English.pdf Accessed 7 Jan 2019.Google Scholar
- Howard Wainer. 1984. How to Display Data Badly. The American Statistician, Vol. 38, 2 (May 1984), 137--147. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2683253Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Visual Portrayals of Data and Results at ITiCSE
Recommendations
GraPS: A Graph Publish/Subscribe Middleware
Middleware '15: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Middleware ConferencePub/sub is an elegant paradigm for disseminating information efficiently and anonymously among producers (publishers) and consumers (subscribers). However, with current topic and content-based pub/sub approaches it is difficult to formulate ...
Do men and women differ in their use of tables and graphs in academic publications?
In psychological research there is huge literature on differences between the sexes. Typically it used to be thought that women were more verbally and men more spatially oriented. These differences now seem to be waning. In this article we present three ...
Initiative for an H-index based Rating of Conferences and Journals in HCI and Related Fields
CHINZ 2015: Proceedings of the 15th New Zealand Conference on Human-Computer InteractionResearch output metrics, in particular for peer-reviewed publications are of increasingly high importance for academics' careers. In Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and related fields of research, like Computer Graphics and Multimedia, simple to use ...
Comments