skip to main content
10.1145/3304221.3325598acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

A Grounded Theory of Computing Professional Identity Formation

Published:02 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Computing professional identity formation is critical for curriculum decision-making, workforce development, and retaining students in computing degree programs. However, we have limited knowledge of how computing professional identity develops. My research focuses on filling this gap by empirically understanding how undergraduate computing students form their professional identity through their negotiations in formal and informal learning environments. The end goal is to generate and test a theory, grounded in data, which can help Computer Science departments to design interventions for fostering computing professional identity formation.

References

  1. John W. Creswell and J. David Creswell. 2017. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sebastian Dziallas. 2018. Characterising Graduateness in Computing Education: A Narrative Approach. (2018). Retrieved January 27, 2019 from https://kar.kent.ac.uk/69292/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Amanpreet Kapoor and Christina Gardner-McCune. 2018. Understanding Professional Identities and Goals of Computer Science Undergraduate Students. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE '18, 191--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Amanpreet Kapoor and Christina Gardner-McCune. 2018. Understanding How Computer Science Undergraduate Students are Developing their Professional Identities. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE '18, 1080--1080. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Amanpreet Kapoor and Christina Gardner-McCune. 2019. Understanding CS Undergraduate Students' Professional Identity through the lens of their Professional Development. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE'19). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jane Kroger and Kathy E. Green. 1996. Events associated with identity status change. J. Adolesc. 19, (1996), 359--380.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated learning?: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. James E. Marcia. 1966. Development and validation of ego-identity status. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 3, 5 (1966), 551--558.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Robert McCartney and Kate Sanders. 2015. School/Work: Development of Computing Students' Professional Identity at University. In Proceedings of the eleventh annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research - ICER '15, 151--159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Greg L. Nelson and Andrew J. Ko. 2018. On Use of Theory in Computing Education Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - ICER '18, 31--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Rick Parker. 2017. Studying Professional Identity in Software Engineering. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - ICER '17, 283--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Anne-Kathrin Peters. 2018. Students' Experience of Participation in a Discipline-A Longitudinal Study of Computer Science and IT Engineering Students. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 19, 1 (September 2018), 1--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Sarah L. Rodriguez and Kathleen Lehman. 2017. Developing the next generation of diverse computer scientists: the need for enhanced, intersectional computing identity theory. Comput. Sci. Educ. 27, 3--4 (October 2017), 229--247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Seth J. Schwartz, Koen Luyckx, and Vivian L. Vignoles. 2011. Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Grounded Theory of Computing Professional Identity Formation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ITiCSE '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
      July 2019
      583 pages
      ISBN:9781450368957
      DOI:10.1145/3304221

      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 July 2019

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate552of1,613submissions,34%

      Upcoming Conference

      ITiCSE 2024
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader