Lee Taber
Steve Whittaker
ABSTRACT
We use personality theory to compare self-presentation between multiple Instagram accounts, investigating authenticity and consistency. Many studies claim social media promote inauthentic self-presentation focused on socially desirable traits. At the same time, affordances suggest that self-presentation should be relatively consistent within one social medium. For 88 participants, we examine personality traits for 'real Instagram' ('Rinsta') versus 'fake Instagram' ('Finsta') accounts, comparing these with people's offline traits using mixed-methods. Counterintuitively, we find Finsta accounts often present socially undesirable traits. Furthermore, different accounts on the same social medium reveal quite different styles of self-presentation. Overall Finstas are more Extraverted, less Conscientious, and less Agreeable than Rinstas, although equally Neurotic as offline. Interviews indicate trait differences arise from differing audience perceptions. A large anonymous Rinsta audience promotes a carefully curated self. In contrast, a small but trusted Finsta audience can engender more authentic, but negative self-presentation. We discuss design and theory implications.
Supplemental Material
- Amichai-Hamburger, Y. and Vinitzky, G. 2010. Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior. 26, 6 (2010), 1289--1295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.018.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Andalibi, N., Ozturk, P. and Forte, A. 2017. Sensitive Self-disclosures, Responses, and Social Support on Instagram: The Case of #Depression. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17 (Portland, Oregon, USA, 2017), 1485--1500.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ayass, R. and Gerhardt, C. eds. 2012. The appropriation of media in everyday life. John Benjamins Pub. Co.Google Scholar
- Back, M.D., Stopfer, J.M., Vazire, S., Gaddis, S., Schmukle, S.C., Egloff, B. and Gosling, S.D. 2010. Facebook Profiles Reflect Actual Personality, Not Self-Idealization. Psychological Science. 21, 3 (2010), 372--374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609360756.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barkhi, R. 2002. Cognitive style may mitigate the impact of communication mode. Information & Management. 39, 8 (Sep. 2002), 677--688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378--7206(01)001148.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bayer, J.B., Ellison, N.B., Schoenebeck, S.Y. and Falk, E.B. 2015. Sharing the small moments: ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat. Information, Communication & Society. 4462, January (2015), 1--22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.108434 9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bernstein, M.S., Bakshy, E., Burke, M. and Karrer, B. 2013. Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3, (2013), 21-- 30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470658.Google ScholarDigital Library
- boyd, danah 2010. Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. (2010), 39--58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/dmal.9780262524834.11Google ScholarCross Ref
- [9] Boyd, D.M. and Ellison, N.B. 2007. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 13, 1 (2007), 210--230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.10836101.2007.00393.x.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N. and Terry, G. 2018. Thematic Analysis. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. P. Liamputtong, ed. Springer Singapore. 1--18.Google Scholar
- Burke, M. and Kraut, R. 2014. Growing closer on Facebook: Changes in tie strength through social network site use. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (2014), 4187--4196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557094.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chou, H.-T.G. and Edge, N. 2012. "They Are Happier and Having Better Lives than I Am": The Impact of Using Facebook on Perceptions of Others' Lives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 15, 2 (2012), 117--121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0324.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Coles, B.A. and West, M. 2016. Trolling the trolls: Online forum users constructions of the nature and properties of trolling. Computers in Human Behavior. 60, (2016), 233--244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.070.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Costa, P. and McCrae, R.R. 1995. Inventory Domains and Facets?: Hierarchical Personality Assessment Using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment. 64, 1 (1995), 21-- 50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6401.Google ScholarCross Ref
- DeVito, M.A., Birnholtz, J. and Hancock, J.T. 2017. Platforms, people, and perception: Using affordances to understand self-presentation on social media. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW. (2017), 740-- 754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998192.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Digman, J.M. 1990. Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model. Annual Review of Psychology. 41, 1 (1990), 417--440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.0 02221.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dunlop, W.L. and Hanley, G.E. 2019. Contextualizing personality: Personality within and across social roles and conceptual levels. Journal of Personality. 87, 4 (2019), 903--914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12443.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ellison, N., Heino, R. and Gibbs, J. 2006. Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication. 11, 2 (2006), 415--441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.10836101.2006.00020.x.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ellison, N.B., Hancock, J.T. and Toma, C.L. 2011. Profile as promise?: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self- presentations. (2011). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811410395.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. 2007. The benefits of facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 12, 4 (2007), 1143--1168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.10836101.2007.00367.x.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ellison, N.B. and Vitak, J. 2015. Social Network Site Affordances and Their Relationship to Social Capital Processes. The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology. 203--227.Google Scholar
- Feuston, J.L. and Piper, A.M. 2019. Everyday Experiences: Small Stories and Mental Illness on Instagram. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19 (Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 2019), 1--14.Google Scholar
- Fiore, A.T. and Donath, J.S. 2004. Online personals: an overview. Extended abstracts of the 2004 conference on Human factors and computing systems - CHI '04 (Vienna, Austria, 2004), 1395.Google Scholar
- Fox, J. and McEwan, B. 2017. Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale. Communication Monographs. 84, 3 (Jul. 2017), 298-- 318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1332418 .Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gibson, J.J. 1986. Gibson Theory of Affordances.pdf. Chapter Eight The Theory of Affordances. (1986), 127--136. DOI: https://doi.org/citeulike-articleid:3508530.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. 1982. The presentation of self in everyday life. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. (1982), 1--10.Google Scholar
- Gosling, S.D. 2009. Snoop: What your stuff says about you. Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Gosling, S.D., Augustine, A.A., Vazire, S., Holtzman, N. and Gaddis, S. 2011. Manifestations of Personality in Online Social Networks: Self-Reported FacebookRelated Behaviors and Observable Profile Information. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 14, 9 (2011), 483--488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0087.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gosling, S.D., Ko, S.J., Mannarelli, T. and Morris, M.E. 2002. A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 82, 3 (2002), 379--398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022--3514.82.3.379.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Grieve, R. and Watkinson, J. 2016. The Psychological Benefits of Being Authentic on Facebook. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking. 19, 7 (Jul. 2016), 420--425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Halpern, D., Katz, J.E. and Carril, C. 2017. The online ideal persona vs. the jealousy effect: Two explanations of why selfies are associated with lower-quality romantic relationships. Telematics and Informatics. 34, 1 (2017), 114--123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.014.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hiltz, S.R. and Turoff, M. 1993. The Network Nation: Human Communication Via Computer. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Hirsh, J.B. and Peterson, J.B. 2009. Personality and language use in self-narratives. Journal of Research in Personality. 43, 3 (2009), 524--527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hogan, B. 2010. The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 30, 6 (2010), 377--386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610385893.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hughes, D.J., Rowe, M., Batey, M. and Lee, A. 2012. A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage. Computers in Human Behavior. 28, 2 (2012), 561-- 569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.001.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jackson, C.A. and Luchner, A.F. 2018. Selfpresentation mediates the relationship between Selfcriticism and emotional response to Instagram feedback. Personality and Individual Differences. 133, (Oct. 2018), 1--6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.052.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jennifer Charteris, Sue Gregory, Y.M. 2014. Snapchat 'selfies': The case of disappearing data. Critical perspectives on educational tehnology. 1995 (2014), 1--5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354305053217.RE ADS.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John, O.P., Naumann, L.P. and Soto, C.J. 2008. Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five Trait taxonomy. Handbook of personality: Theory and research. (2008), 114--158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191--8869(97)810008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kang, J. and Wei, L. 2019. Let me be at my funniest: Instagram users' motivations for using Finsta (a.k.a., fake Instagram). The Social Science Journal. (Jan. 2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.12.005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kim, J. and Lee, J.-E.R. 2010. The Facebook Paths to Happiness: Effects of the Number of Facebook Friends and Self-Presentation on Subjective WellBeing. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 14, 6 (Nov. 2010), 359--364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0374.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D. and Graepel, T. 2013. Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 110, 15 (2013), 5802--5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218772110.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., Kohli, P., Bachrach, Y. and Graepel, T. 2012. Personality and Website Choice. WebSci. (2012), 0--3.Google Scholar
- Litt, E. 2012. Knock, Knock. Who's There? The Imagined Audience. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media. 56, 3 (2012), 330--345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705195.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Litt, E., Spottswood, E., Birnholtz, J., Hancock, J.T., Smith, M.E. and Reynolds, L. 2014. Awkward Encounters of an "Other" Kind: Collective Selfpresentation and Face Threat on Facebook. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. (2014), 449--460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531646.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ma, H., Smith, C.E., He, L., Narayanan, S., Giaquinto, R.A., Evans, R., Hanson, L. and Yarosh, S. 2017. Write for Life: Persisting in Online Health Communities through Expressive Writing and Social Support. Proceedings of the ACM on HumanComputer Interaction. 1, CSCW (Dec. 2017), 1--24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3134708.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marwick, A.E. and boyd, danah 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society. 13, 1 (2011), 114--133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McAdams, D.P. 2013. The Psychological Self as Actor, Agent, and Author. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 8, 3 (May 2013), 272--295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612464657.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McRoberts, S., Ma, H., Hall, A. and Yarosh, S. 2017. Share First, Save Later: Performance of Self through Snapchat Stories. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17 (2017), 6902--6911.Google Scholar
- Mehdizadeh, S. Self-Presentation 2.0: Narcissism and Self-Esteem on Facebook. 8.Google Scholar
- Michikyan, M., Dennis, J. and Subrahmanyam, K. 2015. Can You Guess Who I Am? Real, Ideal, and False Self-Presentation on Facebook Among Emerging Adults. Emerging Adulthood. 3, 1 (Feb. 2015), 55--64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696814532442.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mischel, W. 1968. Personality and assessment. John Wiley.Google Scholar
- Mischel, W. and Shoda, Y. 1995. A cognitiveaffective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review. 102, 2 (1995), 246--268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033--295X.102.2.246.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Naumann, L.P., Vazire, S., Rentfrow, P.J. and Gosling, S.D. 2009. Personality Judgments Based on Physical Appearance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 35, 12 (2009), 1661--1671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209346309.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ngwenyama, O.K. and Lee, A.S. 1997. Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning. MIS Quarterly. 21, 2 (Jun. 1997), 145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249417.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oliver P John and Sanjay Srivastava Big Five Trait Taxonomy.Google Scholar
- Park, G., Andrew Schwartz, H., Eichstaedt, J.C., Kern, M.L., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D.J., Ungar, L.H. and Seligman, M.E.P. 2015. Automatic personality assessment through social media language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 108, 6 (2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Park, G., Schwartz, H.A., Eichstaedt, J.C., Kern, M.L., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D.J., Ungar, L.H. and Seligman, M.E.P. 2015. Automatic personality assessment through social media language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 108, 6 (2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Perrin, A. and Anderson, M. 2019. Share of U.S. adults using social media, including Facebook, is mostly unchanged since 2018. Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
- Pew Research Center 2016. Social Media Update 2016.Google Scholar
- Pitcan, M., Marwick, A.E. and boyd, danah 2018. Performing a Vanilla Self: Respectability Politics, Social Class, and the Digital World. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 23, 3 (May 2018), 163--179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pittman, M. and Reich, B. 2016. Social media and loneliness: Why an Instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand Twitter words. Computers in Human Behavior. 62, (Sep. 2016), 155--167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.084.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Piwek, L. and Joinson, A. 2016. "What do they snapchat about?" Patterns of use in time-limited instant messaging service. Computers in Human Behavior. 54, (2016), 358--367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.026.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reich, W.A., Sangiorgio, C. and Young, J. 2019. SelfRole Integration: A Person-Specific Predictor of Life Satisfaction and Prosocial Behavior. The Journal of Psychology. 153, 6 (Aug. 2019), 649--666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2019.1590297 .Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reinecke, L. and Trepte, S. 2014. Authenticity and well-being on social network sites: A two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of online authenticity and the positivity bias in SNS communication. Computers in Human Behavior. 30, (2014), 95--102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.030.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Seidman, G. 2014. Expressing the "true Self" on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior. 31, 1 (2014), 367--372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.052.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sherlock, M. and Wagstaff, D.L. 2018. Exploring the relationship between frequency of Instagram use, exposure to idealized images, and psychological wellbeing in women. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. (Apr. 2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000182.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Soto, C.J. and John, O.P. 2016. The Next Big Five Inventory ( BFI-2 ): Developing and Assessing a Hierarchical Model With 15 Facets to Enhance Bandwidth ... The Next Big Five Inventory ( BFI-2 ): Developing and Assessing a Hierarchical Model With 15 Facets to Enhance Bandwidth , Fidelit. 113, June (2016), 117--143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Swann, W.B. and Read, S.J. 1981. Self-verification processes: How we sustain our self-conceptions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 17, 4 (Jul. 1981), 351--372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/00221031(81)90043--3.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Taber, L. and Whittaker, S. 2018. Personality Depends on The Medium: Differences in Self-Perception on Snapchat, Facebook and Offline. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18 (Montreal QC, Canada, 2018), 1--13.Google Scholar
- Toma, C.L. 2010. Affirming the Self through Online Profiles?: Beneficial Effects of Social Networking Sites. Network. 62, 2 (2010), 1749--1752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753588.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Treem, J.W. and Leonardi, P.M. 2012. Social Media use in organizations. Communication Yearbook. (2012), 143--189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2129853.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Uski, S. and Lampinen, A. 2016. Social norms and self-presentation on social network sites: Profile work in action. New Media & Society. 18, 3 (Mar. 2016), 447--464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543164.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Utz, S., Tanis, M. and Vermeulen, I. 2012. It Is All About Being Popular: The Effects of Need for Popularity on Social Network Site Use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 15, 1 (2012), 37--42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0651.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Van Gelder, L. 1996. The Strange Case of the Electronic Lover. Computerization and Controversy. Elsevier. 533--546.Google Scholar
- Vaterlaus, J.M., Barnett, K., Roche, C. and Young, J.A. 2016. "Snapchat is more personal": An exploratory study on Snapchat behaviors and young adult interpersonal relationships. Computers in Human Behavior. 62, (2016), 594--601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.029.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vazire, S. 2010. Who knows what about a person? The self--other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 98, 2 (Feb. 2010), 281--300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017908.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vries, D.A. de, Möller, A.M., Wieringa, M.S., Eigenraam, A.W. and Hamelink, K. 2018. Social Comparison as the Thief of Joy: Emotional Consequences of Viewing Strangers' Instagram Posts. Media Psychology. 21, 2 (Apr. 2018), 222--245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2016.1267647 .Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wang, Y., Hinsberger, H. and Kraut, R.E. 2016. Does Saying This Make Me Look Good? How Posters and Outsiders Evaluate Facebook Updates. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16 (2016), 125--129.Google Scholar
- Wang, Y.-C., Kraut, R. and Levine, J.M. 2012. To stay or leave?: the relationship of emotional and informational support to commitment in online health support groups. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW '12 (Seattle, Washington, USA, 2012), 833.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Waterloo, S.F., Baumgartner, S.E., Peter, J. and Valkenburg, P.M. 2018. Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp. New Media & Society. 20, 5 (May 2018), 1813--1831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817707349.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yau, J.C. and Reich, S.M. 2019. "It's Just a Lot of Work": Adolescents' Self-Presentation Norms and Practices on Facebook and Instagram. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 29, 1 (2019), 196--209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12376.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- "On Finsta, I can say 'Hail Satan'": Being Authentic but Disagreeable on Instagram
Recommendations
Personality Depends on The Medium: Differences in Self-Perception on Snapchat, Facebook and Offline
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe investigate self-perception in social media through the lens of personality theory. Two mixed-methods studies involving 148 participants examine if people self-report different personality traits in social media compared with their offline traits. We ...
Platforms, People, and Perception: Using Affordances to Understand Self-Presentation on Social Media
CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social ComputingThe popularity of social media platforms today makes them an important venue for self-presentation, but the unique affordances of these platforms challenge our existing models for understanding self-presentation behavior. In particular, social media ...
Follow Me: Exploring the Effect of Personality and Stranger Connections on Instagram Use
Recent research suggests that the relationship between personality and Facebook use is mediated by the need for belonging and self-presentation. It is uncertain, however, whether these relationships also hold for other social networking sites SNSs, for ...
Comments