skip to main content
10.1145/3316782.3321531acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

VibrAid: comparing temporal and spatial tactile cues in control room environments

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present VibrAid, a miniaturized wrist-worn haptic display that provides vibrotactile alert cues for operators of large dashboard environments. We interviewed three control room operators in a steam plant on what a vibrotactile attention guidance system for the control room should look like and designed our system and the laboratory evaluation environment accordingly. We conducted an experiment (24 participants) comparing task completion time with temporal and spatial attention cues to the standard visual attention cues that are used in most modern monitoring systems. While temporal attention cues did not have an effect on task completion time, spatial cues led to an significant decrease in average task completion time, as well as significantly increasing trust in the ability to keep up with tasks even at a more rushed pace.

References

  1. Christoph Anderson, Isabel Hübener, Ann-Kathrin Seipp, Sandra Ohly, Klaus David, and Veljko Pejovic. 2018. A Survey of Attention Management Systems in Ubiquitous Computing Environments. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2, 2, Article 58 (July 2018). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Paul Bach-y Rita, Carter C Collins, Frank A Saunders, Benjamin White, and Lawrence Scadden. 1969. Vision substitution by tactile image projection. Nature 221, 5184 (1969), 963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Paul Bach-y Rita, Mitchell E Tyler, and Kurt A Kaczmarek. 2003. Seeing with the brain. International journal of human-computer interaction 15, 2 (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Stuart A Boyer. 2009. SCADA: supervisory control and data acquisition. International Society of Automation. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Stephen Brewster and Lorna M. Brown. 2004. Tactons: Structured Tactile Messages for Non-visual Information Display. In AUIC '04. Australian Computer Society, Inc., Darlinghurst, Australia, 9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Sylvain Cardin, Frédéric Vexo, and Daniel Thalmann. 2006. Vibro-tactile interface for enhancing piloting abilities during long term flight. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics 18 (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jessica R. Cauchard, Janette L. Cheng, Thomas Pietrzak, and James A. Landay. 2016. ActiVibe: Design and Evaluation of Vibrations for Progress Monitoring. In CHI '16. ACM, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Roger W Cholewiak and Amy A Collins. 2003. Vibrotactile localization on the arm: Effects of place, space, and age. Perception & psychophysics 65, 7 (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Axel Daneels and Wayne Salter. 1999. What is SCADA? (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Alberto Gallace, Hong Z Tan, and Charles Spence. 2007. The body surface as a communication system: The state of the art after 50 years. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 16, 6 (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Francine Gemperle, Nathan Ota, and Dan Siewiorek. 2001. Design of a Wearable Tactile Display. In ISWC'01. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J H. Clark. 1924. The Ishihara Test for Color Blindness. American Journal of Physiological Optics 5 (01 1924), 269--276.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sandra G. Hart and Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In Human Mental Workload, Peter A. Hancock and Najmedin Meshkati (Eds.). Advances in Psychology, Vol. 52. North-Holland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Cristy Ho, Hong Z Tan, and Charles Spence. 2005. Using spatial vibrotactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes. Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 8, 6 (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Eve Hoggan, Andrew Crossan, Stephen A. Brewster, and Topi Kaaresoja. 2009. Audio or Tactile Feedback: Which Modality when?. In CHI '09. ACM, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Seungyon Claire Lee and Thad Starner. 2010. BuzzWear: alert perception in wearable tactile displays on the wrist. In CHI'10. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. George A Miller. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological review 63, 2 (1956), 81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Randall J Mumaw, Emilie M Roth, Kim J Vicente, and Catherine M Burns. 2000. There is more to monitoring a nuclear power plant than meets the eye. Human factors 42, 1 (2000), 36--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Tomi Nukarinen, Jussi Rantala, Ahmed Farooq, and Roope Raisamo. 2015. Delivering directional haptic cues through eyeglasses and a seat. In World Haptics Conference (WHC), 2015 IEEE. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Matthew S Prewett, Linda R Elliott, Ashley G Walvoord, and Michael D Coovert. 2012. A meta-analysis of vibrotactile and visual information displays for improving task performance. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 42, 1 (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rolf Steyer, Peter Schwenkmezger, Peter Notz, and Michael Eid. 1994. Testtheoretische Analysen des Mehrdimensionalen Befindlichkeitsfragebogen (MDBF). Diagnostica (1994).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Tim Claudius Stratmann, Andreas Loecken, Uwe Gruenefeld, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2018. Exploring Vibrotactile and Peripheral Cues for Spatial Attention Guidance. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hong Tan, Robert Gray, J Jay Young, and Ryan Taylor. 2003. A haptic back display for attentional and directional cueing. (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Landry Delphin Chapwouo Tchakouté, David Gagnon, and Bob-Antoine Jerry Ménélas. 2018. Use of tactons to communicate a risk level through an enactive shoe. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Tobii Technology. 2017. https://gaming.tobii.com/product/tobii-eye-tracker-4c/. (2017). Accessed: 2019-01-17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ogan M Yigitbasioglu and Oana Velcu. 2012. A review of dashboards in performance management: Implications for design and research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 13, 1 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Clint Zeagler. 2017. Where to wear it: functional, technical, and social considerations in on-body location for wearable technology 20 years of designing for wearability. In ISWC 2017. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. VibrAid: comparing temporal and spatial tactile cues in control room environments

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        PETRA '19: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments
        June 2019
        655 pages
        ISBN:9781450362320
        DOI:10.1145/3316782

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 June 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader