skip to main content
10.1145/3319502.3374830acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Can a Robot Handle Customers with Unreasonable Complaints?

Published:09 March 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The service industry is facing an increase in the number of malicious customers (customers with unreasonable complaints). Employees have reported that handling unreasonable complaints is particularly stressful. Considering the recent push for workplace automation, we should have robots handling this task in place of humans. We propose a robot behavioral model designed for handling unreasonable complaints. The robot with this model has to "please the customer'' without proposing a settlement. From a large survey of Japanese workers conducted by labor unions and an interview survey of experienced workers we conducted, we identified the conventional complaint handling flow as 1) listen to the complaint, 2) confirm the content of the complaint, 3) apologize, 4) give an explanation, and 5) conclude. The proposed behavioral model is a variation of this flow that takes into account the "state of mind'' of the customer. In particular, the robot with this model does not leave the first step and keeps asking questions until the customer is "ready to listen''. We conducted a user study, using a Wizard-of-Oz approach, to compare the proposed behavioral model to a baseline one implementing the conventional flow. We replicated in our laboratory the situation of a customer in a mobile phone shop. The proposed behavioral model was significantly better at making the customers believe that the robot listened to them and tried to help.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p579-morimoto.mp4

mp4

55.9 MB

References

  1. Alan Andreasen. 1988. Consumer-Complains and Redress: What we know and what we don't know. In The frontier of research in the consumer interest. 675--722.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Atrash and R. Mead. 2013. HRI-2013 Workshop on Probabilistic Approaches for Robot Control in Human-Robot Interaction (PARC-HRI). In 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). 437--438. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2013.6483635Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Christoph Bartneck, Dana Kulić, Elizabeth Croft, and Susana Zoghbi. [n. d.]. Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics , Vol. 1, 1 ( [n. d.]), 71--81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001--3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. M. Carpinella, A. B. Wyman, M. A. Perez, and S. J. Stroessner. 2017. The Robotic Social Attributes Scale (RoSAS): Development and Validation. In 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI . 254--262.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. R. Choudhury, G. Swamy, D. Hadfield-Menell, and A. D. Dragan. 2019. On the Utility of Model Learning in HRI. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). 317--325. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673256Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C. Datta, C. Jayawardena, I. H. Kuo, and B. A. MacDonald. 2012. RoboStudio: A visual programming environment for rapid authoring and customization of complex services on a personal service robot. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2352--2357. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2012.6386105Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Moshe Davidow. 2000. The Bottom Line Impact of Organizational Responses to Customer Complaints. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research , Vol. 24, 4 (2000), 473--490. https://doi.org/10.1177/109634800002400404Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Malcolm Doering, Phoebe Liu, Dylan F. Glas, Takayuki Kanda, Dana Kulić, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2019. Curiosity Did Not Kill the Robot: A Curiosity-based Learning System for a Shopkeeper Robot. ACM Trans. Hum.-Robot Interact. , Vol. 8, 3, Article 15 (July 2019), bibinfonumpages24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3326462Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. Ferri, A. Manzi , P. Salvini, B. Mazzolai , C. Laschi, and P. Dario. 2011. DustCart, an autonomous robot for door-to-door garbage collection: From DustBot project to the experimentation in the small town of Peccioli. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 655--660. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2011.5980254Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. R.A. Fullerton and G. Punj. 2004. Repercussions of promoting an ideology of consumption: consumer misbehavior. Journal of Business Research , Vol. 57, 11 (2004), 1239 -- 1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148--2963(02)00455--1 Examining marketing's unintended consequences.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Dylan Glas, Satoru Satake, Takayuki Kanda, and Norihiro Hagita. 2011. An Interaction Design Framework for Social Robots. In Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems . Los Angeles, CA, USA. https://doi.org/10.15607/RSS.2011.VII.014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. H.. Gross, H. Boehme, C. Schroeter, S. Mueller , A. Koenig, E. Einhorn , C. Martin, M. Merten, and A. Bley. 2009. TOOMAS: Interactive Shopping Guide robots in everyday use - final implementation and experiences from long-term field trials. In 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2005--2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2009.5354497Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Huang, T. Lau , and M. Cakmak. 2016. Design and evaluation of a rapid programming system for service robots. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) . 295--302. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451765Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hyunjeong Lee, Hyun Jin Kim, and Changsu Kim. 2007. Autonomous behavior design for robotic appliance. In 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). 201--208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hiromi Ikeuchi. 2018. Survey on measures against malicious complaints: Analysis of the results (in Japanese) . Technical Report. Federation of labor unions in the textile, chemical and food service industries (UA zensen).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Peter H. Kahn, Nathan G. Freier, Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Jolina H. Ruckert, Rachel L. Severson, and Shaun K. Kane. 2008. Design Patterns for Sociality in Human-robot Interaction. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI '08). ACM, 97--104. https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349836Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. T. Kanda, H. Ishiguro, T. Ono, M. Imai, and R. Nakatsu. 2002. Development and evaluation of an interactive humanoid robot "Robovie". In Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292) , Vol. 2. 1848--1855 vol.2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. T. Kanda, M. Shiomi , Z. Miyashita, H. Ishiguro, and N. Hagita. 2010. A Communication Robot in a Shopping Mall. IEEE Transactions on Robotics , Vol. 26, 5 (2010), 897--913. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2010.2062550Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Merel Keijsers and Christoph Bartneck. 2018. Mindless Robots Get Bullied. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 205--214. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171266Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rachel Kirby, Jodi Forlizzi, and Reid Simmons. 2010. Affective social robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems , Vol. 58, 3 (2010), 322 -- 332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2009.09.015Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Min Kyung Lee, Sara Kiesler, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. Receptionist or Information Kiosk: How Do People Talk with a Robot?. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 31--40. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718927Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. H. Lucas, J. Poston , N. Yocum, Z. Carlson, and D. Feil-Seifer. 2016. Too big to be mistreated? Examining the role of robot size on perceptions of mistreatment. In 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). 1071--1076. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745241Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. R. Milner and A. Furnham. 2017. Measuring Customer Feedback, Response and Satisfaction. Psychology , Vol. 8 (2017), 350--362. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2017.83021Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. B. Mutlu and J. Forlizzi. 2008. Robots in organizations: The role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction. In 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). 287--294. https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349860Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Marketta Niemel"a , P"aivi Heikkil"a, and Hanna Lammi. 2017. A Social Service Robot in a Shopping Mall: Expectations of the Management, Retailers and Consumers. In Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 227--228. https://doi.org/10.1145/3029798.3038301Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. A. K. Pandey and R. Gelin. 2018. A Mass-Produced Sociable Humanoid Robot: Pepper: The First Machine of Its Kind. IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine , Vol. 25, 3 (2018), 40--48. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2018.2833157Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Maria Prischepa and Victor Budkov. 2011. Hierarchical Dialogue System for Guide Robot in Shopping Mall Environments. In Text, Speech and Dialogue, Ivan Habernal and Václav Matouvs ek (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 163--170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Javier Ram'irez, José C Segura, Carmen Benìtez, Ángel de la Torre, and Antonio Rubio. 2004. Efficient voice activity detection algorithms using long-term speech information. Speech Communication , Vol. 42, 3 (2004), 271 -- 287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2003.10.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. E. Sanoubari, S. H. Seo, D. Garcha, J. E. Young, and V. Loureiro-Rodríguez. 2019. Good Robot Design or Machiavellian? An In-the-Wild Robot Leveraging Minimal Knowledge of Passerby's Culture. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). 382--391. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673326Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. S. Satake, K. Hayashi, K. Nakatani, and T. Kanda. 2015. Field trial of an information-providing robot in a shopping mall. In 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . 1832--1839. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2015.7353616Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Allison Sauppé and Bilge Mutlu. 2014. Design Patterns for Exploring and Prototyping Human-robot Interactions. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, 1439--1448. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557057Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. P. Sequeira, P. Alves-Oliveira, T. Ribeiro, E. Di Tullio, S. Petisca, F. S. Melo , G. Castellano, and A. Paiva. 2016. Discovering social interaction strategies for robots from restricted-perception Wizard-of-Oz studies. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). 197--204. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451752Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Kerstin Severinson-Eklundh, Anders Green, and Helge Hüttenrauch. 2003. Social and collaborative aspects of interaction with a service robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems , Vol. 42, 3 (2003), 223 -- 234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921--8890(02)00377--9 Socially Interactive Robots.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. A. J. C. Trappey, C. Lee, W. Chen, and C. V. Trappey. 2010. A framework of customer complaint handling system. In 2010 7th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management. 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2010.5530119Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Can a Robot Handle Customers with Unreasonable Complaints?

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          HRI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
          March 2020
          690 pages
          ISBN:9781450367462
          DOI:10.1145/3319502

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 9 March 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader