skip to main content
10.1145/3321707.3321753acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A memetic algorithm approach to network alignment: mapping the classification of mental disorders of DSM-IV with ICD-10

Published:13 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Given two graphs modelling related, but possibly distinct, networks, the alignment of the networks can help identify significant structures and substructures which may relate to the functional purpose of the network components. The Network Alignment Problem is the NP-hard computational formalisation of this goal and is a useful technique in a variety of data mining and knowledge discovery domains. In this paper we develop a memetic algorithm to solve the Network Alignment Problem and demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach on a series of biological networks against the existing state of the art alignment tools. We also demonstrate the use of network alignment as a clustering and classification tool on two mental health disorder diagnostic databases.

References

  1. Ahmed Shamsul Arefin, Mario Inostroza-Ponta, Luke Mathieson, Regina Berretta, and Pablo Moscato. 2011. Clustering Nodes in Large-Scale Biological Networks Using External Memory Algorithms. In Algorithms and Architectures for Parallel Processing, Yang Xiang, Alfredo Cuzzocrea, Michael Hobbs, and Wanlei Zhou (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 375--386. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Vincent D Blondel, Jean-Loup Guillaume, Renaud Lambiotte, and Etienne Lefebvre. 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment 2008, 10 (2008), P10008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. G. A. Croes. 1958. A Method for Solving Traveling Salesman Problems. Operations Research 6 (1958), 791--812.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Natalie Jane de Vries, Jamie Carlson, and Pablo Moscato. 2014. A Data-Driven Approach to Reverse Engineering Customer Engagement Models: Towards Functional Constructs. PLOS ONE 9, 7 (07 2014), 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. W. E. Djeddi, S. B. Yahia, and E. M. Nguifo. 2018. A Novel Computational Approach for Global Alignment for Multiple Biological Networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 15, 6 (Nov 2018), 2060--2066. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mohammed El-Kebir, Jaap Heringa, and W. Gunnar Klau. 2015. Natalie 2.0: Sparse global network alignment as a special case of quadratic assignment. Algorithms 8, 4 (2015), 1035--1051.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. David E. Goldberg and Robert Lingle, Jr. 1985. Alleles Loci and the Traveling Salesman Problem. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 154--159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Pietro Hiram Guzzi and Tijana Milenković. 2017. Survey of local and global biological network alignment: the need to reconcile the two sides of the same coin. Briefings in Bioinformatics 19, 3 (01 2017), 472--481.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mohammad Nazmul Haque and Pablo Moscato. 2018. The cohesion-based communities of symptoms of the largest component of the DSM-IV network. Retrieved the PrePrint from https://psyarxiv.com/spd8k.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Somaye Hashemifar and Jinbo Xu. 2014. HubAlign: an accurate and efficient method for global alignment of protein-protein interaction networks. Bioinformatics 30, 17 (2014), i438--i444.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Gunnar W. Klau. 2009. A new graph-based method for pairwise global network alignment. BMC Bioinformatics 10, Suppl 1 (2009), S59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Luke Mathieson, Natalie Jane de Vries, and Pablo Moscato. 2019. Using Network Alignment to Identify Conserved Consumer Behaviour Modeling Constructs. In Business and Consumer Analytics: New Ideas, Pablo Moscato and Natalie Jane de Vries (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, Chapter 12. https://www.springer.com/us/book/9783030062217Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Pablo Moscato. 1989. On evolution, search, optimization, genetic algorithms and martial arts: Towards memetic algorithms. Technical Report 826. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Behnam Neyshabur, Ahmadreza Khadem, Somaye Hashemifar, and Seyed Shahriar Arab. 2013. NETAL: a new graph-based method for global alignment of protein-protein interaction networks. Bioinformatics 29, 13 (2013), 1654--1662.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Hiroyuki Ogata, Wataru Fujibuchi, Susumu Goto, and Minoru Kanehisa. 2000. A heuristic graph comparison algorithm and its application to detect functionally related enzyme clusters. Nucleic acids research 28, 20 (2000), 4021--4028.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. World Health Organization. 1993. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Vikram Saraph and Tijana Milenković. 2014. MAGNA: Maximizing Accuracy in Global Network Alignment. Bioinformatics 30, 20 (2014), 2931--2940.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Tie Shen, Zhengdong Zhang, Zhen Chen, Dagang Gu, Shen Liang, Yang Xu, Ruiyuan Li, Yimin Wei, Zhijie Liu, Yin Yi, et al. 2018. A genome-scale metabolic network alignment method within a hypergraph-based framework using a rotational tensor-vector product. Scientific reports 8, 1 (2018), 16376.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kai Spiegelhalder, Cathy Scholtes, and Dieter Riemann. 2010. The association between insomnia and cardiovascular diseases. Nature and science of sleep 2 (2010), 71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Damian Szklarczyk, Andrea Franceschini, Stefan Wyder, Kristoffer Forslund, Davide Heller, Jaime Huerta-Cepas, Milan Simonovic, Alexander Roth, Alberto Santos, Kalliopi P Tsafou, et al. 2014. STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic acids research 43, D1 (2014), D447--D452.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Pia Tio, Sacha Epskamp, Arjen Noordhof, and Denny Borsboom. 2016. Mapping the manuals of madness: Comparing the ICD-10 and DSM-IV-TR using a network approach. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 25, 4 (2016), 267--276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz. 1997. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature 393 (1997), 440--442.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Jialiang Yang, Jun Li, Stefan Grünewald, and Xiu-Feng Wan. 2013. BinAligner: a heuristic method to align biological networks. In BMC bioinformatics, Vol. 14. BioMed Central, S8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A memetic algorithm approach to network alignment: mapping the classification of mental disorders of DSM-IV with ICD-10

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          GECCO '19: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
          July 2019
          1545 pages
          ISBN:9781450361118
          DOI:10.1145/3321707

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 13 July 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

          Upcoming Conference

          GECCO '24
          Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
          July 14 - 18, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader