skip to main content
10.1145/3322276.3323691acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Honorable Mention

Data Rhetoric and Uneasy Alliances: Data Advocacy in US Labor History

Published:18 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

To gain historical perspective on the role of technical expertise in the labor movement, we explore the data-driven practices of mid-century American labor unionists who appropriated techniques from scientific management to advocate for workers. Analyzing the data artifacts and academic writings of the Management Engineering department of the International Ladies Garment Workers Union, we describe the rhetorical use of data within a mutual-gains model of participation. We draw insights from the challenges faced by the department, assess the feasibility of implementing these approaches in the present, and identify opportunities for the participatory design of workplace advocacy systems moving forward.

References

  1. Banks, D. A. 2018. Which Side Are They On? The Baffler. Retrieved January 12, 2019 from https://thebaffler.com/latest/which-side-are-they-on-banksGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barkin, S. Wage determination: Trick or technique? Labor and Nation 112(1946), 24--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumer, E. P. S., and Brubaker, J. R. Post-userism. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '17,ACM (2017), 6291--6303. Denver,Colorado, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Belfer, N. Section work in the women's garment industry.Southern Economic Journal 21, 2( 1954--10), 188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Braverman, H. Labor and monopoly capital: the degradation of work in the twentieth century, 25th anniversary ed. Monthly Review Press, 1998.{Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bødker, S. When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction changing roles - NordiCHI '06, ACM Press (2006), 1--8. Oslo, Norway. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., and Newell, A. The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems. Communications of the ACM 23,7 (1980), 396--410. 8} Cohn, J. E. 2018. Ultrasonic bracelet and receiver for detecting position in 2D plane. (Jan. 2018). Patent No. 9881276, Filed Mar 28, 2016, Issued January 30, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Conger, K. Amazon Workers Demand Jeff Bezos Cancel Face Recognition Contracts With Law Enforcement. Retrieved January 12, 2019 from https://gizmodo.com/amazon-workers-demand-jeff-bezos-cancel-face-recognitio-1827037509Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Derber, M. The American idea of industrial democracy, 1865--1965.University of Illinois Press,1970. OCLC: 96125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ehn, P. Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Arbetslivscentrum: International distribution, Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1988. OCLC:19412176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ehn, P., Botsman, C., and Rawlinson, P. Negotiating change: new technology and trade unions: an interview with Pelle Ehn. Local Consumption, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ehrenkranz, M. After Five Years of Fighting, Google and Facebook Security Guards Finally Have Their Union Contract. Gizmodo. Retrieved January 12, 2019 from https://gizmodo.com/after-five-years-of-fighting-google-and-facebook-secur-1828304237Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans, J. An introduction to Wobbly: an app for 21st century workers' power. Notes From Below. Retrieved September 25, 2018 from http://www.notesfrombelow.org/article/an-introduction-to-wobblyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. The Gilbreth Network: Therbligs. The Gilbreth Network. Retrieved April 17, 2019 from http://gilbrethnetwork.tripod.com/therbligs.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Frenkel, S. Microsoft employees protest work with ICE, as tech industry mobilizes over immigration.The New York Times (2018-06--20)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gannage, C. Changing dimensions of control and resistance: The toronto garment industry.Journal of Canadian Studies 24, 4 (1990-01), 41--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Ghaoui, C., Ed.Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction. Idea Group Reference, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Gomberg, W. Labor Union Manual on Job Evaluation. Roosevelt College, Labor Education Division, 1947.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Gomberg, W. Measuring the fatigue factor. ILR Review 1, 1 (1947), 80--93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Gomberg, W. The validity of time study techniques.Science Research Associates, 1948. OCLC: 2046699.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Gomberg, W. A trade union analysis of time study.Prentice-Hall, 1955. OCLC: 562377.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Gomberg, W. Trade unions and industrial engineering (section 17). In Handbook of industrial engineering and management. Prentice-Hall, 1955, 1121--1183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. ILGWU. Archives union file (AUF), section 4: Boxes 192--256. Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives 6046, box 196.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. ILGWU. Belle knitting mills report: Management Engineering department. Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives KCL05780--118, box 2, folder 5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. ILGWU. ILGWU 35mm negatives of photographs.Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives 5780 Box 84 Folder 5; Box 85 Folder 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. ILGWU. Management engineering department records, 1941--1980. Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives KCL05780--118, box 1--2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. ILGWU. Shop time and motion study. Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives 5780 AV, box 2, folder 23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. ILGWU. Study of Mode O' Day corporation. Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives KCL05780--118, box 2, folder 18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. ILGWU. Survey of Typical Equipment. Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives KCL05780--118, box 1, folder 15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Irani, L. C., and Silberman, M. S. Turkopticon:Interrupting worker invisibility in amazon mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '13,ACM (2013), 611--620. New York, NY,USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Jacoby, S. M. Union-management cooperation in the united states: Lessons from the 1920s.ILR Review 37, 1 (1983--10-01), 18--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Khovanskaya, V., Dombrowski, L., Harmon, E.,Korn, M., Light, A., Stewart, M., and Voida, A. Designing against the status quo. Interactions 25, 2(2018-02), 64--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Kirk, E. T.A check list for the therblig hold.1950.OCLC: 819642082.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Kyng, M. Bridging the gap between politics and techniques: On the next practices of participatory design. Scandinavian journal of information systems.22, 1 (2010), 49--68. OCLC: 663337998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Mayhew, C., and Quinlan, M. Fordism in the fast food industry: pervasive management control and occupational health and safety risks for young temporary workers.SHIL Sociology of Health & Illness 24, 3 (2002), 261--284. OCLC: 5156499300.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Maynard, H. B.Industrial engineering handbook. McGraw-Hill, 1956. OCLC: 562114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. McKelvey, J. T.AFL attitudes toward production,1900--1932.Cornell University, 1952. OCLC:1705604.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Nadler, G.Work simplification. McGraw-Hill, 1957.OCLC: 773888.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Nadworny, M. J.Scientific management and theunions, 1900--1932; a historical analysis. Harvard University Press, 1955. OCLC: 233696.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Nyland, C. Taylorism and the mutual-gains strategy.IREL Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 37, 4 (1998), 519--542. OCLC: 5155620776.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Perry, E. I. Industrial reform in new york city: Belle moskowitz and the protocol of peace, 19131916.Labor History Labor History 23, 1 (1982), 5--31.OCLC: 4804884243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Pigors, P. Labor-management conflict or co-operation. Mechanical Engineering: the Journal of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers 70(1948), 531--534.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Pinch, T.J. and Bijker, W. E. The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other. Social Studies of Science, 14 (1984). 399--441.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Rzeszotarski, J. M., and Kittur, A. Instrumenting the crowd: Using implicit behavioral measures to predict task performance. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST '11, ACM (2011), 13--22. New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Shane, S., Metz, C., and Wakabayashi, D. 2018. How a Pentagon Contract Became an Identity Crisis for Google. The New York Times. Retrieved January 12, 2019 from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/30/technology/google-project-maven-pentagon.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Shapiro, D. A modernised participatory design? A response to kyng.Scandinavian journal of information systems. 22, 1 (2010), 69--76. OCLC:663338001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Slichter, S. H.Union Policies and industrial management. Brookings Inst., 1941. OCLC:253542532.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Spinuzzi, C. The methodology of participatory design. Technical Communication 52, 2 (2005),163--174. OCLC: 6896565896.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Tiku, N. 2018. The Year Tech Workers Realized They Were Workers. Wired. Retrieved January 12, 2019 from https://www.wired.com/story/why-hotel-workers-strike-reverberated-through-tech/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Wakabayashi, D., Griffith, E., Tsang, A., and Conger, K. 2018. Google Walkout: Employees Stage Protest Over Handling of Sexual Harassment. The New York Times. Retrieved January 12, 2019 from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/01/technology/google-walkout-sexual-harassment.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Wolfson, T. Role of the ILGWU in stabilizing the women's garment industry.Industrial and Labor Relations Review Industrial and Labor Relations Review 4, 1 (1950), 33. OCLC: 7376976360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Data Rhetoric and Uneasy Alliances: Data Advocacy in US Labor History

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        DIS '19: Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference
        June 2019
        1628 pages
        ISBN:9781450358507
        DOI:10.1145/3322276

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 June 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        DIS '19 Paper Acceptance Rate105of415submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

        Upcoming Conference

        DIS '24
        Designing Interactive Systems Conference
        July 1 - 5, 2024
        IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader