skip to main content
10.1145/3325112.3328217acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Distributed Participatory Governance

Published:18 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Governance structures are experiencing increasing levels of stress inherent in a world that is evolving rapidly toward more complexity. They are compelled to adapt. In parallel, social media becomes a key new arena for influence. The trend is irreversible and governance structures will need to adapt too. Yet, online social platforms are ill-equipped to provide healthy debates and are needing to be redesigned with governance in mind. From there, we see two trends emerging for the future of governance. First, a centralized and algorithmic-assisted governance with social media as an instrument of control. Second, an European declaration of intent which emphasizes data ownership and sovereignty. In the wake of these ideals, we engage a discussion for distributed and agile human governance that aligns with this intention. However, this theoretical model is challenging to current governance structures. Whatever the outcome, it is our belief that the future of democratic governance lies in a human-centered computer interaction.

References

  1. Licklider, J. (1990). Man-computer symbiosis. {ebook} Palo Alto: Systems Research Center of Digital Equipment Corporation, http://memex.org/licklider.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ehrsam, F. (2017). Blockchain governance: Programming our future, https://bit.ly/2zO45ST.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Van Weyenbergh, G. and Werner, B. (2018). A social architecture to scale trust, Steps toward a social ecosystem. 1st ed. {ebook} Brussels: Meoh ASBL. https://bit.ly/2IRIRqc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Wagner, R. (2018). Is heterarchy the answer to the crisis of hierarchy?, https://bit.ly/2UdLg5u.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gharajedaghi, J. (2006). Systems thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity. Amsterdam {etc.}: Butterworth-Heinemann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. En.wikipedia.org. (2019). Social Credit System, https://bit.ly/2eHPomc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hock, D. (1999). Birth of the chaordic age. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    dg.o 2019: Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
    June 2019
    533 pages
    ISBN:9781450372046
    DOI:10.1145/3325112

    Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 18 June 2019

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate150of271submissions,55%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format