skip to main content
10.1145/3329189.3329201acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespervasivehealthConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Supporting Behavior Management with a Classroom Display Providing Immediate Feedback to Students

Published:20 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Managing behaviors in classroom settings requires clear communication of expectations, and consistent feedback to students about whether expectations are being met. These strategies promote mental health and support students with emotional or behavioral disabilities. Yet behavioral psychology literature indicates a significant gap between evidence-based strategies for behavior management, and implementation of these strategies in real classroom settings. We engaged school practitioners in examining and designing for the implementation challenges they face. This work focused on one of the most common classroom behavior management strategies, the token economy, and how it is utilized across special education and regular education settings. Using the approaches of action research and human-centered design, we explored the integration of pervasive computing technologies in classroom practices to address key implementation challenges. We present a resulting classroom display prototype, which we developed and deployed. We describe its integration into classroom flow, and discuss the role pervasive computing can play in promoting behavioral awareness and emotional well-being throughout the school day.

References

  1. Teodoro Ayllon and Nathan Azrin. 1968. The token economy: A motivational system for therapy and rehabilitation. (1968).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Victoria Besalel-Azrin, Nathan Azrin, and P.M. Armstrong. 1977. The student-oriented classroom: A method of improving student conduct and satisfaction. Behavior Therapy 8, 2 (1977), 193--204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. LouAnne E. Boyd, Kathryn E. Ringland, Oliver L. Haimson, Helen Fernandez, Maria Bistarkey, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2015. Evaluating a collaborative iPad game's impact on social relationships for children with autism spectrum disorder. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 7, 1 (2015), 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Catherine P. Bradshaw, Mary M. Mitchell, and Philip J. Leaf. 2010. Examining the effects of schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports on student outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 12, 3 (2010), 133--148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Catherine P. Bradshaw, Wendy M. Reinke, Louis D. Brown, Katherine B. Bevans, and Philip J. Leaf. 2008. Implementation of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) in elementary schools: Observations from a randomized trial. Education and Treatment of Children 31, 1 (2008), 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Cheryl Boydell Brauner and Cheryll Bowers Stephens. 2006. Estimating the prevalence of early childhood serious emotional/behavioral disorders: Challenges and recommendations. Public health reports 121, 3 (2006), 303--310.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Karina Caro, Mónica Tentori, Ana I. Martinez-Garcia, and Marina Alvelais. 2017. Using the Froggy Bobby exergame to support eye-body coordination development of children with severe autism. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 105 (2017), 12--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Sunny Consolvo, Predrag Klasnja, David W. McDonald, Daniel Avrahami, Jon Froehlich, Louis LeGrand, Ryan Libby, Keith Mosher, and James A. Landay. 2008. Flowers or a robot army?: Encouraging awareness & activity with personal, mobile displays. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing. ACM, 54--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Meg Cramer and Gillian R. Hayes. 2013. The digital economy: A case study of designing for classrooms. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM, 431--434. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jean B Crockett and James M Kauffman. 2013. The least restrictive environment: Its origins and interpretations in special education. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Christopher Doll, Tim McLaughlin, and Anjali Barretto. 2013. The token economy: A recent review and evaluation. International Journal of basic and applied science 2, 1 (2013), 131--149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Steve M. Dorman. 1998. Assistive technology benefits for students with disabilities. The Journal of school health 68, 3 (1998), 120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Allison Druin. 1999. Cooperative inquiry: developing new technologies for children with children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 592--599. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Susan Elswick and Laura Baylot Casey. 2011. The Good Behavior Game Is No Longer Just an Effective Intervention for Students: An Examination of the Reciprocal Effects on Teacher Behaviors. Beyond Behavior 21, 1 (2011), 36--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Holly A. Filcheck, Cheryl B. McNeil, Laurie A. Greco, and Rebecca S. Bernard. 2004. Using a whole-class token economy and coaching of teacher skills in a preschool classroom to manage disruptive behavior. Psychology in the Schools 41, 3 (2004), 351--361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Gillian R. Hayes. 2011. The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 18, 3, Article 15 (Aug. 2011), 20 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Gillian R. Hayes, Lamar M. Gardere, Gregory D. Abowd, and Khai N. Truong. 2008. CareLog: A selective archiving tool for behavior management in schools. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 685--694. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Gillian R. Hayes, Sen Hirano, Gabriela Marcu, Mohamad Monibi, David H. Nguyen, and Michael Yeganyan. 2010. Interactive visual supports for children with autism. Personal and ubiquitous computing 14, 7 (2010), 663--680. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Ramon Hervas, David Ruiz-Carrasco, Tania Mondejar, and Jose Bravo. 2017. Gamification mechanics for behavioral change: a systematic review and proposed taxonomy. In Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. ACM, 395--404. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Sen H. Hirano, Michael T Yeganyan, Gabriela Marcu, David H. Nguyen, LouAnne Boyd, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2010. vSked: evaluation of a system to support classroom activities for children with autism. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1633--1642. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Robert H. Horner, Anne W. Todd, Teri Lewis-Palmer, Larry K. Irvin, George Sugai, and Joseph B. Boland. 2004. The school-wide evaluation tool (SET) a research instrument for assessing schoolwide positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 6, 1 (2004), 3--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Alan Kazdin. 2012. The token economy: A review and evaluation. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Sheppard G. Kellam, C. Hendricks Brown, Jeanne M. Poduska, Nicholas S. Ialongo, Wei Wang, Peter Toyinbo, Hanno Petras, Carla Ford, Amy Windham, and Holly C. Wilcox. 2008. Effects of a universal classroom behavior management program in first and second grades on young adult behavioral, psychiatric, and social outcomes. Drug and alcohol dependence 95 (2008), S5--S28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Julie A. Kientz, Sebastian Boring, Gregory D. Abowd, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2005. Abaris: Evaluating automated capture applied to structured autism interventions. UbiComp 2005: Ubiquitous Computing (2005), 903--903. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Daniel M. Maggin, Sandra M. Chafouleas, Katelyn M. Goddard, and Austin H. Johnson. 2011. A systematic evaluation of token economies as a classroom management tool for students with challenging behavior. Journal of School Psychology 49, 5 (2011), 529--554.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. George C. Main and Barry C. Munro. 1977. A token reinforcement program in a public junior-high school. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 10, 1 (1977), 93--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Brent Mangus, Hester Henderson, and Ron French. 1986. Implementation of a token economy by peer tutors to increase on-task physical activity time of autistic children. Perceptual and Motor Skills 63, 1 (1986), 97--98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Gabriela Marcu, Anind K. Dey, and Sara Kiesler. 2012. Parent-driven use of wearable cameras for autism support: a field study with families. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 401--410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Gabriela Marcu, Anind K. Dey, Sara Kiesler, and Madhu Reddy. 2016. Time to Reflect: Supporting Health Services over Time by Focusing on Collaborative Reflection. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Gabriela Marcu, Kevin Tassini, Quintin Carlson, Jillian Goodwyn, Gabrielle Rivkin, Kevin J. Schaefer, Anind K. Dey, and Sara Kiesler. 2013. Why do they still use paper?: Understanding data collection and use in autism education. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). 3177--3186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Aleksandar Matic, Gillian R. Hayes, Monica Tentori, Maryam Abdullah, and Sabrina Schuck. 2014. Collective use of a situated display to encourage positive behaviors in children with behavioral challenges. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 885--895. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Johnny L. Matson and Jessica A. Boisjoli. 2009. The token economy for children with intellectual disability and/or autism: A review. Research in Developmental Disabilities 30, 2 (2009), 240--248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Carol W. Metzler, Anthony Biglan, Julie C. Rusby, and Jeffrey R. Sprague. 2001. Evaluation of a comprehensive behavior management program to improve school-wide positive behavior support. Education and Treatment of Children 24, 4 (2001), 448--479.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. George H. Noell, Gary J. Duhon, Susan L. Gatti, and James E. Connell. 2002. Consultation, follow-up, and implementation of behavior management interventions in general education. School Psychology Review 31, 2 (2002), 217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. H.R. Perkins and T.F. McLaughlin. 2015. Classroom interventions for elementary school children with EBD: A brief review. International Journal of Applied Research 1, 4 (2015), 24--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Anne Marie Piper, Eileen O'Brien, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Terry Winograd. 2006. SIDES: a cooperative tabletop computer game for social skills development. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Henry C. Rickard, Kenneth B. Melvin, Joe Creel, and Laura Creel. 1973. The effects of bonus tokens upon productivity in a remedial classroom for behaviorally disturbed children. Behavior Therapy 4, 3 (1973), 378--385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Kathryn E. Ringland, Rodrigo Zalapa, Megan Neal, Lizbeth Escobedo, Monica Tentori, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2014. SensoryPaint: A Multimodal Sensory Intervention for Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 873--884. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Brandi Simonsen, Sarah Fairbanks, Amy Briesch, Diane Myers, and George Sugai. 2008. Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and treatment of children 31, 3 (2008), 351--380.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. George Sugai and Robert R. Horner. 2006. A promising approach for expanding and sustaining school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review 35, 2 (2006), 245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Rachel S.F. Tarbox, Patrick M. Ghezzi, and Ginger Wilson. 2006. The effects of token reinforcement on attending in a young child with autism. Behavioral Interventions 21, 3 (2006), 155--164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Richard M. Wielkiewicz. 1995. Behavior management in the schools: Principles and procedures. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Supporting Behavior Management with a Classroom Display Providing Immediate Feedback to Students

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        PervasiveHealth'19: Proceedings of the 13th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
        May 2019
        475 pages
        ISBN:9781450361262
        DOI:10.1145/3329189

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 May 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate55of116submissions,47%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader