skip to main content
10.1145/3330204.3330248acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbsiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Louvre: A Framework for Metadata Curation in Data Ecosystem

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Data Ecosystems are a cultural, technological, and social phenomenon based on the interplay of technology, actors and businesses, which provide an environment for creating, managing and sustaining data sharing initiatives. There is a general consensus as to the crucial role metadata can play on the Data Ecosystem. However, in most cases, the metadata management is underspecified, if not unaddressed at all. The employment of a metadata curation strategy can bring an ecosystem success and further ensure realization of Data Ecosystem actors' purposes. In this work, our contribution is proposing a Metadata Curation Framework, called Louvre, which proposes a wide range of processes for curating metadata in Data Ecosystems. The promise is the employment of a well-conceived, efficient curation strategy for metadata.

References

  1. Alexander Ball. 2012. Review of the State of the Art of the Digital Curation of Research Data. http://opus.bath.ac.uk/18774/2/erim1rep091103ab11.pdf. Accessed on 20 December, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Costis Dallas. 2016. Digital curation beyond the "wild frontier": A pragmatic approach. Archival Science 16, 4 (2016), 421--457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Humberto Rocha de Almeida Neto, Edviges Mariza Campos de Magalhães, Hermano Perrelli de Moura, Jose Gilson de Almeida Teixeira Filho, Claudia Cappelli, and Luiz Mauricio Fraga Martins. 2015. Evaluation of a Maturity Model for Agile Governance in ICT using Focus Group. In Proceedings of the annual conference on Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems: Information Systems: A Computer Socio-Technical Perspective, Vol. 1. SBC, 3--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Barbara Dinter, Christian Schieder, and Peter Gluchowski. 2015. A Stakeholder Lens on Metadata Management in Business Intelligence and Big Data -- Results of an Empirical Investigation. In Proceedings of the American Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS'2015) (2015-08-13). Association for Information Systems, Puerto Rico, 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Helton Douglas A dos Santos, Marcelo Iury S Oliveira, AB Glória de Fátima, Karina Moura da Silva, Rayelle I Vera Cruz S Muniz, and Bernadette Farias Lóscio. 2018. Investigations into data published and consumed on the Web: a systematic mapping study. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society 24, 1 (2018), 14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Andrea Forte and Cliff Lampe. 2013. Defining, understanding, and supporting open collaboration: Lessons from the literature. American Behavioral Scientist 57, 5 (2013), 535--547.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Vinícius Cardoso Garcia. 2010. RiSE reference model for software reuse adoption in Brazilian companies. (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Antonio Carlos Gil. 2008. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 6. ed. Editora Atlas SA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Firas S Glaiel, Allen Moulton, and Stuart E Madnick. 2014. Agile project dynamics: A system dynamics investigation of agile software development methods. ESD Working Paper Series Octorber 2014 (2014), 1--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Carole Goble, Robert Stevens, Duncan Hull, Katy Wolstencroft, and Rodrigo Lopez. 2008. Data curation+ process curation= data integration+ science. Briefings in bioinformatics 9, 6 (2008), 506--517.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Alan R Hevner, Salvatore T March, Jinsoo Park, and Sudha Ram. 2008. Design science in information systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly 28, 1 (2008), 6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sarah Higgins. 2008. The DCC curation lifecycle model. International journal of digital curation 3, 1 (2008), 134--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Data Documentation Initiative. 2012. Data Documentation Initiative Specification. http://www.ddialliance.org/Specification. Accessed on 20 December, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. ISO. 2011. ISO 8000 -- the international standard for data quality. https://www.iso.org/standard/50798.html Accessed on 20 December, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. IEC ISO. 2008. IEEE 12207-2008- ISO/IEC/IEEE International Standard- Systems and software engineering -- Software life cycle processes. https://www.iso.org/standard/43447.html Accessed on 20 December, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Barbara A Kitchenham and Shari Lawrence Pfleeger. 2002. Principles of survey research part 2: designing a survey. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 27, 1 (2002), 18--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Inna Kouper, Stacy R Konkiel, Jennifer A Liss, and Juliet L Hardesty. 2013. Collaborate, Automate, Prepare, Prioritize: Creating metadata for legacy research data. In International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications. Dublin Core Metadata Initiave, Libon, PT, 41--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Christopher ALee. 2010. Open archival information system (OAIS) reference model. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences (2010), 4020--4030.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Seiyoung Lee and Hwan-Seung Yong. 2013. Agile software development framework in a small project environment. Journal of Information Processing Systems 9, 1 (2013), 69--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Alexandre José Henrique de Oliveira LUNA. 2009. MAnGve: Um Modelo para Governança Ágil em TIC. Ph.D. Dissertation. Dissertação de Mestrado em Ciência da Computação. Programa de Pós-graduação stricto sensu em Ciência da Computação. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Natasha Susan Mauthner and Odette Parry. 2013. Open access digital data sharing: Principles, policies and practices. Social Epistemology 27, 1 (2013), 47--67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Mark Mosley. 2008. DAMA-DMBOK functional framework. DAMA International.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Marcelo Iury S Oliveira, Glória de Fátima Barros Lima, and Bernadette Farias Lóscio. 2019. Investigations into Data Ecosystems: a systematic mapping study. Knowledge and Information Systems (2019), 1--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Marcelo Iury S. Oliveira and Bernadette Farias Lóscio. 2018. What is a Data Ecosystem?. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age (dg.o '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 74, 9 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Marcelo Iury S. Oliveira, Lairson Alencar Oliveira, Glória Fátima Barros Lima, and Bernadette Farias Lóscio. 2016. Enabling a Unified View of Open Data Catalogs. In 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Jian Qin, Alex Ball, and Jane Greenberg. 2012. Functional and architectural requirements for metadata: Supporting discovery and management of scientific data. In International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia, 62--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Louvre: A Framework for Metadata Curation in Data Ecosystem

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            SBSI '19: Proceedings of the XV Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems
            May 2019
            623 pages
            ISBN:9781450372374
            DOI:10.1145/3330204

            Copyright © 2019 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 20 May 2019

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate181of557submissions,32%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader