ABSTRACT
Data Ecosystems are a cultural, technological, and social phenomenon based on the interplay of technology, actors and businesses, which provide an environment for creating, managing and sustaining data sharing initiatives. There is a general consensus as to the crucial role metadata can play on the Data Ecosystem. However, in most cases, the metadata management is underspecified, if not unaddressed at all. The employment of a metadata curation strategy can bring an ecosystem success and further ensure realization of Data Ecosystem actors' purposes. In this work, our contribution is proposing a Metadata Curation Framework, called Louvre, which proposes a wide range of processes for curating metadata in Data Ecosystems. The promise is the employment of a well-conceived, efficient curation strategy for metadata.
- Alexander Ball. 2012. Review of the State of the Art of the Digital Curation of Research Data. http://opus.bath.ac.uk/18774/2/erim1rep091103ab11.pdf. Accessed on 20 December, 2018.Google Scholar
- Costis Dallas. 2016. Digital curation beyond the "wild frontier": A pragmatic approach. Archival Science 16, 4 (2016), 421--457.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Humberto Rocha de Almeida Neto, Edviges Mariza Campos de Magalhães, Hermano Perrelli de Moura, Jose Gilson de Almeida Teixeira Filho, Claudia Cappelli, and Luiz Mauricio Fraga Martins. 2015. Evaluation of a Maturity Model for Agile Governance in ICT using Focus Group. In Proceedings of the annual conference on Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems: Information Systems: A Computer Socio-Technical Perspective, Vol. 1. SBC, 3--11. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barbara Dinter, Christian Schieder, and Peter Gluchowski. 2015. A Stakeholder Lens on Metadata Management in Business Intelligence and Big Data -- Results of an Empirical Investigation. In Proceedings of the American Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS'2015) (2015-08-13). Association for Information Systems, Puerto Rico, 1--12.Google Scholar
- Helton Douglas A dos Santos, Marcelo Iury S Oliveira, AB Glória de Fátima, Karina Moura da Silva, Rayelle I Vera Cruz S Muniz, and Bernadette Farias Lóscio. 2018. Investigations into data published and consumed on the Web: a systematic mapping study. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society 24, 1 (2018), 14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andrea Forte and Cliff Lampe. 2013. Defining, understanding, and supporting open collaboration: Lessons from the literature. American Behavioral Scientist 57, 5 (2013), 535--547.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vinícius Cardoso Garcia. 2010. RiSE reference model for software reuse adoption in Brazilian companies. (2010).Google Scholar
- Antonio Carlos Gil. 2008. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 6. ed. Editora Atlas SA.Google Scholar
- Firas S Glaiel, Allen Moulton, and Stuart E Madnick. 2014. Agile project dynamics: A system dynamics investigation of agile software development methods. ESD Working Paper Series Octorber 2014 (2014), 1--29.Google Scholar
- Carole Goble, Robert Stevens, Duncan Hull, Katy Wolstencroft, and Rodrigo Lopez. 2008. Data curation+ process curation= data integration+ science. Briefings in bioinformatics 9, 6 (2008), 506--517.Google Scholar
- Alan R Hevner, Salvatore T March, Jinsoo Park, and Sudha Ram. 2008. Design science in information systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly 28, 1 (2008), 6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sarah Higgins. 2008. The DCC curation lifecycle model. International journal of digital curation 3, 1 (2008), 134--140.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Data Documentation Initiative. 2012. Data Documentation Initiative Specification. http://www.ddialliance.org/Specification. Accessed on 20 December, 2018.Google Scholar
- ISO. 2011. ISO 8000 -- the international standard for data quality. https://www.iso.org/standard/50798.html Accessed on 20 December, 2018.Google Scholar
- IEC ISO. 2008. IEEE 12207-2008- ISO/IEC/IEEE International Standard- Systems and software engineering -- Software life cycle processes. https://www.iso.org/standard/43447.html Accessed on 20 December, 2018.Google Scholar
- Barbara A Kitchenham and Shari Lawrence Pfleeger. 2002. Principles of survey research part 2: designing a survey. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 27, 1 (2002), 18--20. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Inna Kouper, Stacy R Konkiel, Jennifer A Liss, and Juliet L Hardesty. 2013. Collaborate, Automate, Prepare, Prioritize: Creating metadata for legacy research data. In International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications. Dublin Core Metadata Initiave, Libon, PT, 41--46. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christopher ALee. 2010. Open archival information system (OAIS) reference model. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences (2010), 4020--4030.Google Scholar
- Seiyoung Lee and Hwan-Seung Yong. 2013. Agile software development framework in a small project environment. Journal of Information Processing Systems 9, 1 (2013), 69--88.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alexandre José Henrique de Oliveira LUNA. 2009. MAnGve: Um Modelo para Governança Ágil em TIC. Ph.D. Dissertation. Dissertação de Mestrado em Ciência da Computação. Programa de Pós-graduação stricto sensu em Ciência da Computação. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.Google Scholar
- Natasha Susan Mauthner and Odette Parry. 2013. Open access digital data sharing: Principles, policies and practices. Social Epistemology 27, 1 (2013), 47--67.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mark Mosley. 2008. DAMA-DMBOK functional framework. DAMA International.Google Scholar
- Marcelo Iury S Oliveira, Glória de Fátima Barros Lima, and Bernadette Farias Lóscio. 2019. Investigations into Data Ecosystems: a systematic mapping study. Knowledge and Information Systems (2019), 1--42.Google Scholar
- Marcelo Iury S. Oliveira and Bernadette Farias Lóscio. 2018. What is a Data Ecosystem?. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age (dg.o '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 74, 9 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marcelo Iury S. Oliveira, Lairson Alencar Oliveira, Glória Fátima Barros Lima, and Bernadette Farias Lóscio. 2016. Enabling a Unified View of Open Data Catalogs. In 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jian Qin, Alex Ball, and Jane Greenberg. 2012. Functional and architectural requirements for metadata: Supporting discovery and management of scientific data. In International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia, 62--71. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
Louvre: A Framework for Metadata Curation in Data Ecosystem
Recommendations
Digital Preservation, Archival Science and Methodological Foundations for Digital Libraries
Digital libraries, whether commercial, public, or personal, lie at the heart of the information society. Yet, research into their long-term viability and the meaningful accessibility of their contents remains in its infancy. In general, as we have ...
Digital preservation in a box: outreach resources for digital stewardship
JCDL '12: Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital Libraries"Digital Preservation in a Box" is a major activity of the National Digital Stewardship Alliance (NDSA) Outreach Working Group. This toolkit of digital stewardship outreach resources can be utilized by diverse communities as a gentle introduction to the ...
Metadata models for organizing digital archives on the web: metadata-centric projects at Tsukuba and lessons learned
DCMI'18: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata ApplicationsThere exist many digital collections of cultural and historical resources, referred to as digital archives in this paper. Domains of digital archives are expanding from traditional cultural heritage objects to new areas such as popular culture and ...
Comments