skip to main content
10.1145/3332186.3332228acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespearcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Assessment of financial returns on investments in cyberinfrastructure facilities: A survey of current methods

Published:28 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent years, considerable attention has been given to assessing the value of investments in cyberinfrastructure (CI). This paper includes a survey of current methods for the assessment of financial returns on investment (ROI) in CI. Applying the financial concept of ROI proves challenging with regard to a service that, in most academic environments, does not generate a "sold amount" such as one would find in the buying and selling of stocks. The paper concludes with a discussion of future research directions and challenges in the assessment of financial ROI in CI. This work is intended less as a definitive guide than as a starting point for further exploration in the assessment of CI's value for scientific research.

References

  1. {n. d.}. Advanced CyberInfrastructure - Research and Education Facilitators. https://aciref.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. {n. d.}. Aristotle Cloud Federation: Federated Cloud Model. http://federatedcloud.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. {n. d.}. Campus Research Computing Consortium. https://carcc.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. {n. d.}. Cornell University Center for Advanced Computing. https://www.cac.cornell.edu/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. {n. d.}. Economic Impact Analysis for Planning. http://www.implan.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. {n. d.}. Fermilab HEPCloud. https://hepcloud.fnal.gov/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. {n. d.}. High Performance Computing (HPC) Research. https://hyperionresearch.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. {n. d.}. ROI with HPC. https://www.hpcuserforum.com/ROI/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. {n. d.}. The CMS Experiment. https://cms.cern/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. {n. d.}. XSEDE. https://www.xsede.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. {n. d.}. XSEDE Campus Champions. https://www.xsede.org/web/site/community-engagement/campus-championsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 2004. W.K. Kellog Foundation Logic Model Development Guide.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 2007. Sourcebook for Evaluating Global and Regional Partnership Programs: Indicative Principles and Standards. Washington, D.C. http://www.oecd.org/development/evaluation/dcdndep/37981082.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 2018. Colleges With the Greatest Percentage Decreases in Full-Time Undergraduates. Chronicle of Higher Education 65, 15 (12 2018). https://www.chronicle.com/article/Colleges-With-the-Greatest/245285Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Amy Apon, Stanley Ahalt, Vijay Dantuluri, Constantin Gurdgiev, Moez Limayem, Linh Ngo, and Michael Stealey. 2010. High Performance Computing Instrumentation and Research Productivity in U.S. Universities. Journal of Information Technology Impact 10, 2 (9 2010), 87--98. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1679248Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jill Barshay. 2018. College students predicted to fall by more than 15% after the year 2025. The Hechinger Report (9 2018). https://hechingerreport.org/college-students-predicted-to-fall-by-more-than-15-after-the-year-2025/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. L. Bauerdick, B. Bockelman, D. Dykstra, S. Fuess, G. Garzoglio, O. Gutsche, B. Holzman, D. Hufnagel, Hanjin Kim, R. Kennedy, D.I. Mason, P. Spentzouris, S. Timm, A. Tiradani, and E. Vaandering. 2017. Experience in using commercial clouds in CMS. Journal of Physics Conference Series 898, 5 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Evan F. Bollig and James C. Wilgenbusch. 2018. From Bare Metal to Virtual. In PEARC '18 Proceedings of the Practice and Experience on Advanced Research Computing. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 13:1--13:8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sandy Dall'erba and Zhangliang Chen. 2017. The Impact of Blue Waters on the Economy of Illinois. Technical Report. 4 pages. http://www.ncsa.illinois.edu/assets/pdf/about/bw_economic_impact.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Robert L DeLeon, Thomas R Furlani, Steven M Gallo, Joseph P White, Matthew D Jones, Abani Patra, Martins Innus, Thomas Yearke, Jeffrey T Palmer, Jeanette M Sperhac, Ryan Rathsam, Nikolay Simakov, Gregor von Laszewski, and Fugang Wang. 2015. TAS View of XSEDE Users and Usage. In Proceedings of the 2015 XSEDE Conference: Scientific Advancements Enabled by Enhanced Cyberinfrastructure (XSEDE '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 21:1--21:8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lizanne DeStefano and Lorna Rivera. 2015. Cyberinfrastructure Value Assessment Report. Technical Report. http://hdl.handle.net/2022/20568Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Robert Henschel, Phillip M. Nista, Matthias Lieber, Brian J. Haas, Le-Shin Wu, and Richard D. LeDuc. 2012. Trinity RNA-Seq assembler performance optimization. (2012), 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Will Kenton. 2018. Investopedia: Cost Center. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cost-center.aspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Michael R. Kinney and Cecily A. Raiborn. 2012. Cost Accounting - Foundations and Evolutionse (9th ed.).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. D.L. Kirkpatrick. 1998. Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (2nd ed.). BerrettKoehler Publishers, San Francisco, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. D. Lifka, R. Reynolds, Susan Mehringer, and P. Redfern. {n. d.}. Overview of the Cornell University Center for Advanced Computing Sustainable Funding Model. In NSF Workshop on Sustainable Funding and Business Models for High Performance Computing Centers. Ithaca, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. National Center for Supercomputing Applications. 2017. NCSA's Blue Waters project provides $1.08 billion direct return to Illinois' economy. http://www.ncsa.illinois.edu/news/story/ncsas_blue_waters_project_provides_1.08_billion_direct_return_to_illinois_eGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Jeffrey T. Palmer, M. Gallo, Steven, Thomas R. Furlani, Matthew D.Jones, Robert L. DeLeon, Joseph P. White, Nikolay Simakov, Abani K. Patra, Jeanette Sperhac, Thomas Yearke, Ryan Rathsam, Martins Innus, Cynthia Cornelius, James Browne, William L. Barth, and T. Evans, Richard. 2015. Open XDMoD: A Tool for the Comprehensive Management of High Performance Computing Resources. Computing in Science and Engineering 17, 4 (2015), 52--62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. HHS Office of Civil Rights. 2016. Widespread HIPAA vulnerabilities result in $2.7 million settlement with Oregon Health & Science University {Press release}. https://wayback.archive-it.org/3926/20170128024121/https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2016/07/18/widespread-hipaa-vulnerabilities-result-in-settlement-with-oregon-health-science-university.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Olga Scrivener, Gangadeep Singh, Sara E. Bouchard, Scott C. Hutcheson, Ben Fulton, Matthew R. Link, and Katy Borner. 2018. XD Metrics on Demand Value Analytics: Visualizing the Impact of Internal Information Technology Investments on External Funding, Publications, and Collaboration Networks. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Troy Segal. 2019. Investopedia: Profit Center. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/profitcentre.aspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. P.E. Stephan. 2012. How Economics Shapes Science, Vol. 1. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Craig Stewart, David Hancock, Amy Apon, Alan Sill, D.F. McMullen, Thomas Furlani, Julie Wernert, Nicholas Berente, Ron Payne, David Lifka, and Thomas Cheatham. 2019. Assessment of return on investment in cyberinfrastructure facilities: A survey of current methods for assessing non-financial impact. In Workshop Proceedings: Humans in the Loop: Enabling and Facilitating Research on Cloud Computing. PEARC19. Chicago, IL. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Craig Stewart, Beth Plale, Von Welch, Marlon Pierce, Geoffrey C. Fox, Thomas G. Doak, David Y. Hancock, Robert Henschel, Matthew R. Link, Therese Miller, Eric Wernert, Michael J. Boyles, Ben Fulton, Le Mai Weakley, Robert Ping, Tassie Gniady, and Winona Snapp-Childs. 2017. Pervasive Technology Institute Annual Report: Research Innovations and Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Services in Support of IU Strategic Goals During FY 2017. Technical Report. Indiana University, Bloomington. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/handle/2022/21809Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Craig A Stewart, T M Cockerill, I Foster, D Hancock, N Merchant, E Skidmore, D Stanzione, J Taylor, S Tuecke, G Turner, M Vaughn, and N Gaffney. 2015. Jetstream - A self-provisioned, scalable science and engineering cloud environment. In Proceedings of the 2015 XSEDE Conference: Scientific Advancements Enabled by Enhanced Cyberinfrastructure. St. Louis, MO, 29:1--29:8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Craig A. Stewart, David Y. Hancock, Julie Wernert, Matthew R. Link, Nancy Wilkins-Diehr, Therese Miller, Kelly Gaither, and Winona Snapp-Childs. 2018. Return on Investment for Three Cyberinfrastructure Facilities: A Local Campus Supercomputer, the NSF-Funded Jetstream Cloud System, and XSEDE (the eXtreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment). In 2018 IEEE/ACM 11th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC). IEEE, 223--236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Craig A. Stewart, R. Knepper, M.R. Link, M. Pierce, E.A. Wernert, and N. Wilkins-Diehr. 2017. Cyberinfrastructure, Cloud Computing, Science Gateways, Visualization, and Cyberinfrastructure Ease of Use. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Fourth Edition (fourth ed.), M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.). IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 1063--1074.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Craig A Stewart, Ralph Roskies, Richard Knepper, Richard L Moore, Justin Whitt, and Timothy M Cockerill. 2015. XSEDE Value Added, Cost Avoidance, and Return on Investment. In Proceedings of the 2015 XSEDE Conference: Scientific Advancements Enabled by Enhanced Cyberinfrastructure (XSEDE '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 23:1--23:8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Craig A. Stewart, Julie A. Wernert, Nancy Wilkins-ÂŋDiehr, and Kelly Gaither. 2018. XSEDE Return on Investment Data and Analysis, 2015--2017. Technical Report. Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana. http://hdl.handle.net/2022/22491Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Abhinav S Thota, Ben Fulton, Le Mai Weakley Weakley, Robert Henschel, David Y Hancock, Matt Allen, Jenett Tillotson, Matt Link, and Craig A Stewart. 2016. A PetaFLOPS Supercomputer As a Campus Resource: Innovation, Impact, and Models for Locally-Owned High Performance Computing at Research Colleges and Universities. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on SIGUCCS Annual Conference (SIGUCCS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 61--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. G von Laszewski, F Wang, G C Fox, D L Hart, T R Furlani, R L DeLeon, and S M Gallo. 2015. Peer Comparison of XSEDE and NCAR Publication Data. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing. 531--532. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Assessment of financial returns on investments in cyberinfrastructure facilities: A survey of current methods

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          PEARC '19: Proceedings of the Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing on Rise of the Machines (learning)
          July 2019
          775 pages
          ISBN:9781450372275
          DOI:10.1145/3332186
          • General Chair:
          • Tom Furlani

          Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

          This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 28 July 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate133of202submissions,66%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader