skip to main content
10.1145/3334480.3382860acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

AmbiPlant - Ambient Feedback for Digital Media through Actuated Plants

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

To enhance viewing experiences during digital media consumption, both research and industry have considered ambient feedback effects to visually and physically extend the content presented. In this paper, we present AmbiPlant, a system using support structures for plants as interfaces for providing ambient effects during digital media consumption. In our concept, the media content presented to the viewer is augmented with visual actuation of the plant structures in order to enhance the viewing experience. We report on the results of a user study comparing our AmbiPlant condition to a condition with ambient lighting and a condition without ambient effects. Our system outperformed the no ambient effects condition in terms of engagement, entertainment, excitement and innovation and the ambient lighting condition in terms of excitement and innovation.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

lbw260pv.mp4

mp4

31.2 MB

References

  1. Fredrik Aspling, Jinyi Wang, and Oskar Juhlin. 2016. Plant-computer Interaction, Beauty and Dissemination. In Proceedings of ACI '16. ACM, Article 5, 10 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2995257.2995393Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Carla Barreiros, Eduardo Veas, and Viktoria Pammer. 2018. Bringing Nature into Our Lives. In Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction in Context, Masaaki Kurosu (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 99--109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Carla Alexandra Souta Barreiros, Eduardo E. Veas, and Viktoria Pammer. 2017. BioIoT: Communicating Sensory Information of a Coffee Machine Using a Nature Metaphor. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2388--2394. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053193Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Joey Benedek and Trish Miner. 2002. Measuring Desirability: New methods for evaluating desirability in a usability lab setting. Proceedings of Usability Professionals Association 2003, 8--12 (2002), 57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Marc Bohlen and Michael Mateas. 1998. Office Plant# 1: Intimate space and contemplative entertainment. Leonardo 31, 5 (1998), 345--348.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Adrian David Cheok, Roger Thomas Kok, Chuen Tan, Owen Noel Newton Fernando, Tim Merritt, and Janyn Yen Ping Sen. 2008. Empathetic Living Media. In Proceedings of DIS '08. ACM, 465--473. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1394445.1394495Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jacqueline T. Chien, François V. Guimbretière, Tauhidur Rahman, Geri Gay, and Mark Matthews. 2015. Biogotchi!: An Exploration of Plant-Based Information Displays. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1139--1144. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732770Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Donald Degraen, Felix Kosmalla, and Antonio Krüger. 2019. Overgrown: Supporting Plant Growth with an Endoskeleton for Ambient Notifications. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article LBW2116, 6 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312833Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Vito Gentile, Salvatore Sorce, Ivan Elhart, and Fabrizio Milazzo. 2018. Plantxel: Towards a Plant-Based Controllable Display. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '18). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article Article 16, 8 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3205873.3205888Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M.L. Heilig. 1962. Sensorama simulator. U.S. Patent Number 3050870. (1962).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jinghui Hou, Yujung Nam, Wei Peng, and Kwan Min Lee. 2012. Effects of Screen Size, Viewing Angle, and Players' Immersion Tendencies on Game Experience. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28, 2 (March 2012), 617--623. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. W.A. IJsselsteijn. 2003. Presence in the past : what can we learn from media history? IOS Press, Netherlands, 17--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Brett R. Jones, Hrvoje Benko, Eyal Ofek, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2013. IllumiRoom: Peripheral Projected Illusions for Interactive Experiences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 869--878. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466112Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Myongchan Kim, Sungkil Lee, and Seungmoon Choi. 2012. Saliency-Driven Tactile Effect Authoring for Real-Time Visuotactile Feedback. In Haptics: Perception, Devices, Mobility, and Communication, Poika Isokoski and Jukka Springare (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 258--269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Satoshi Kuribayashi, Yusuke Sakamoto, and Hiroya Tanaka. 2007. I/O Plant: A Tool Kit for Designing Augmented Human-Plant Interactions. In CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '07). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2537--2542. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1240866.1241037Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Wataru Kurihara, Akito Nakano, Kumiko Kushiyama, and Hisakazu Hada. 2019. Prototyping of Ambient Media Using Shameplants. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 32, 2 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3321335.3329683Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Markus Löchtefeld, Nadine Lautemann, Sven Gehring, and Antonio Krüger. 2014. ambiPad: Enriching Mobile Digital Media with Ambient Feedback. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services (MobileHCI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 295--298. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2628363.2628395Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Eunji Oh, Minkyoung Lee, and Sujin Lee. 2011. How 4D Effects Cause Different Types of Presence Experience?. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Virtual Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry (VRCAI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 375--378. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2087756.2087819Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Tim Merritt Roshan Lalintha Peiris Charith Lasantha Fernando Nimesha Ranasinghe Inosha Wickrama Kasun Karunanayaka Owen Noel Newton Fernando, Adrian David Cheok. 2009. Babbage Cabbage: Biological Empathetic Media. In VRIC Laval Virtual Proceedings. 363--366.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pat Pataranutaporn, Todd Ingalls, and Ed Finn. 2018. Biological HCI: Towards Integrative Interfaces Between People, Computer, and Biological Materials. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '18). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article Paper LBW579, 6 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188662Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. B. Rainer, M. Waltl, E. Cheng, M. Shujau, C. Timmerer, S. Davis, I. Burnett, C. Ritz, and H. Hellwagner. 2012. Investigating the impact of sensory effects on the Quality of Experience and emotional response in web videos. In 2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience. 278--283. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263842Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Ben Salem, Adrian Cheok, and Adria Bassaganyes. 2009. BioMedia for Entertainment. In Entertainment Computing - ICEC 2008, Scott M. Stevens and Shirley J. Saldamarco (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 232--242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Harpreet Sareen and Pattie Maes. 2019. Cyborg Botany: Exploring In-Planta Cybernetic Systems for Interaction. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article Paper LBW0237, 6 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3313091Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Furi Sawaki, Kentaro Yasu, and Masahiko Inami. 2012. flona: Development of an Interface That Implements Lifelike Behaviors to a Plant. In Advances in Computer Entertainment, Anton Nijholt, Teresa Romão, and Dennis Reidsma (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 557--560.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Desney S. Tan, Darren Gergle, Peter Scupelli, and Randy Pausch. 2003. With Similar Visual Angles, Larger Displays Improve Spatial Performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 217--224. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/642611.642650Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. A. Weffers-Albu, S. de Waele, W. Hoogenstraaten, and C. Kwisthout. 2011. Immersive TV viewing with advanced Ambilight. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE). 753--754. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICCE.2011.5722845Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. EJ Williams. 1949. Experimental Designs Balanced for the Estimation of Residual Effects of Treatments. Australian Journal of Chemistry 2, 2 (1949), 149--168. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/CH9490149Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Graham Wilson and Stephen A. Brewster. 2017. Multi-moji: Combining Thermal, Vibrotactile & Visual Stimuli to Expand the Affective Range of Feedback. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1743--1755. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025614Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. AmbiPlant - Ambient Feedback for Digital Media through Actuated Plants

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2020
          4474 pages
          ISBN:9781450368193
          DOI:10.1145/3334480

          Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 25 April 2020

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • abstract

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

          CHI '24
          CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 11 - 16, 2024
          Honolulu , HI , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format