skip to main content
10.1145/3334480.3382912acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Interactive Tactile Map as a Tool for Building Spatial Knowledge of Visually Impaired Older Adults

Published:25 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present an interactive tactile map tailored for older adults with vision impairments, which should help them to acquire spatial knowledge of complex indoor environments, like a residential care home. Interestingly current research largely omits visually impaired older adults. As the outcome of our iterative design process, we introduced the design of the tactile map that employs haptically salient key objects and large touch-sensitive segments along with the route-guidance function. Route-guidance function enriches the tactile map with the desired route information to support the route knowledge acquisition. Qualitative evaluation (mean age was 81.4 years) indicates the ability of our concept to help our audience building spatial knowledge of the indoor environment.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

lbw039pv.mp4

mp4

7.5 MB

References

  1. Jérémy Albouys-Perrois, Jérémy Laviole, Carine Briant, and Anke M Brock. 2018. Towards a multisensory augmented reality map for blind and low vision people: A participatory design approach. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 629.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Caio Brito, Gutenberg Barros, Walter Correia, Veronica Teichrieb, and João Marcelo Teixeira. 2016. Multimodal augmentation of surfaces using conductive 3D printing. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Posters. ACM, 15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Anke Brock, Philippe Truillet, Bernard Oriola, Delphine Picard, and Christophe Jouffrais. 2012. Design and user satisfaction of interactive maps for visually impaired people. In International Conference on Computers for Handicapped Persons. Springer, 544--551.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Anke M Brock, Philippe Truillet, Bernard Oriola, Delphine Picard, and Christophe Jouffrais. 2015. Interactivity improves usability of geographic maps for visually impaired people. Human--Computer Interaction 30, 2 (2015), 156--194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Emeline Brule, Gilles Bailly, Anke Brock, Frédéric Valentin, Grégoire Denis, and Christophe Jouffrais. 2016. MapSense: multi-sensory interactive maps for children living with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 445--457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Luis Cavazos Quero, Jorge Iranzo Bartolomé, Dongmyeong Lee, Yerin Lee, Sangwon Lee, and Jundong Cho. 2019. Jido: A Conversational Tactile Map for Blind People. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 682--684.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. P John Clarkson, Roger Coleman, Simeon Keates, and Cherie Lebbon. 2013. Inclusive design: Design for the whole population. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sara J Czaja, Walter R Boot, Neil Charness, and Wendy A Rogers. 2019. Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches. CRC press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kouki Doi and Takahiro Nishimura. 2019. Production Method of Readable Tactile Map With Vocal Guidance Function for the Visually Impaired. In Handmade Teaching Materials for Students With Disabilities. IGI Global, 316--337.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. MA Espinosa and E Ochaita. 1998. Using tactile maps to improve the practical spatial knowledge of adults who are blind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 92, 5 (1998), 338--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Julia Frankenstein, Betty J Mohler, Heinrich H Bülthoff, and Tobias Meilinger. 2012. Is the map in our head oriented north? Psychological science 23, 2 (2012), 120--125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. George A Gescheider, SJ Bolanowski, KL Hall, KE Hoffman, and RT Verrillo. 1994. The effects of aging on information-processing channels in the sense of touch: I. Absolute sensitivity. Somatosensory & motor research 11, 4 (1994), 345--357.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Vojtech Gintner, Miroslav Macik, and Zdenek Mikovec. 2019. Perception of Tactile Symbols by Visually Impaired Older Adults. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 325--334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Stéphanie Giraud, Anke M Brock, Marc J-M Macé, and Christophe Jouffrais. 2017. Map learning with a 3D printed interactive small-scale Model: Improvement of space and text memorization in visually impaired students. Frontiers in psychology 8 (2017), 930.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Daniel Goldreich and Ingrid M Kanics. 2003. Tactile acuity is enhanced in blindness. Journal of Neuroscience 23, 8 (2003), 3439--3445.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Reginald G Golledge. 1993. Geography and the disabled: A survey with special reference to vision impaired and blind populations. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers (1993), 63--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Timo Götzelmann. 2016. LucentMaps: 3D printed audiovisual tactile maps for blind and visually impaired people. In Proceedings of the 18th international ACM Sigaccess conference on computers and accessibility. 81--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Yvette Hatwell and Francoise Martinez-Sarrochi. 2003. The tactile reading of maps and drawings, and the access of blind people to works of art. Touching for knowing: cognitive psychology of haptic manual perception 53 (2003), 255.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Leona Holloway, Kim Marriott, and Matthew Butler. 2018. Accessible Maps for the Blind: Comparing 3D Printed Models with Tactile Graphics. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rebecca L Hollyfield and Emerson Foulke. 1983. The spatial cognition of blind pedestrians. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness (1983).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Amy Horowitz, Mark Brennan, Joann P Reinhardt, and Thalia MacMillan. 2006. The impact of assistive device use on disability and depression among older adults with age-related vision impairments. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 61, 5 (2006), S274--S280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. R Dan Jacobson. 1998. Cognitive mapping without sight: Four preliminary studies of spatial learning. Journal of Environmental Psychology 18, 3 (1998), 289--306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Shaun K Kane, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2013. Touchplates: low-cost tactile overlays for visually impaired touch screen users. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, 22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Rushil Khurana, Duncan McIsaac, Elliot Lockerman, and Jennifer Mankoff. 2018. Nonvisual interaction techniques at the keyboard surface. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Miroslav Macik, Vojtech Gintner, Dominika Palivcova, and Ivo Maly. 2018. Tactile symbols for visually impaired older adults. In 2018 9th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom). IEEE, 000105--000110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Miroslav Macik, Ivo Maly, Jan Balata, and Zdenek Mikovec. 2017. How can ICT help the visually impaired older adults in residential care institutions: The everyday needs survey. In Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), 2017 8th IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 000157--000164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. DR Montello. 2005. Navigation. In The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking, Priti Shah and Akira Miyake (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Oxford, 257--294.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Valerie S Morash, Allison E Connell Pensky, Steven TW Tseng, and Joshua A Miele. 2014. Effects of using multiple hands and fingers on haptic performance in individuals who are blind. Perception 43, 6 (2014), 569--588.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. World Health Organization. 2018. International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision. (Dec 2018). https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/ http://id.who.int/icd/entity/1103667651.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Jonathan Rowell and Simon Ungar. 2005. Feeling our way: tactile map user requirements-a survey. In International Cartographic Conference, La Coruna.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Gennaro Ruggiero, Francesco Ruotolo, and Tina Iachini. 2009. The role of vision in egocentric and allocentric spatial frames of reference. Cognitive processing 10 (2009), 283--285.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Gavriel Salvendy. 2012. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Brandon Taylor, Anind Dey, Dan Siewiorek, and Asim Smailagic. 2016. Customizable 3D printed tactile maps as interactive overlays. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 71--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Simon Ungar, Mark Blades, and Christopher Spencer. 1993. The role of tactile maps in mobility training. British Journal of Visual Impairment 11, 2 (1993), 59--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Hans-Werner Wahl. 2013. The psychological challenge of late-life vision impairment: Concepts, findings, and practical implications. Journal of ophthalmology 2013 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Lizzie Ward and Laura Banks. 2017. Older people's experiences of sight loss in care homes. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Maarten WA Wijntjes, Thijs Van Lienen, Ilse M Verstijnen, and Astrid ML Kappers. 2008. The influence of picture size on recognition and exploratory behaviour in raised-line drawings. Perception 37, 4 (2008), 602--614.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Interactive Tactile Map as a Tool for Building Spatial Knowledge of Visually Impaired Older Adults

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2020
        4474 pages
        ISBN:9781450368193
        DOI:10.1145/3334480

        Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 April 2020

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • abstract

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format