ABSTRACT
Text input in virtual reality is not widespread outside of labs, although being increasingly researched. Current setups require powerful components that are expensive or not portable, hence preventing effective in-the-wild use. Latest technological advances enable portable mixed reality experiences on smartphones. In this work, we propose a portable low-fidelity solution for text input in mixed reality on a physical keyboard that employs accessible off-the-shelf components. Through a user study with 24 participants, we show that our prototype leads to a significantly higher text input performance compared to soft keyboards. However, it falls behind on copy editing compared to soft keyboards. Qualitative inquiries revealed that participants enjoyed the ample display space and perceived the accompanied privacy as beneficial. Finally, we conclude with challenges and future research that builds upon the presented findings.
- John Brooke. 1995. SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189 (Nov 1995). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228593520_SUS_A_quick_and_dirty_usability_scaleGoogle Scholar
- Steven Feiner, Blair MacIntyre, Marcus Haupt, and Eliot Solomon. 1993. Windows on the world: 2 D windows for 3 D augmented reality. In ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 145--155.Google Scholar
- Anna Maria Feit, Daryl Weir, and Antti Oulasvirta. 2016. How We Type: Movement Strategies and Performance in Everyday Typing. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16. ACM Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858233Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jens Grubert, Eyal Ofek, Michel Pahud, and Per Ola Kristensson. 2018. The Office of the Future: Virtual, Portable, and Global. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 38, 6 (Nov 2018), 125--133. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mcg.2018.2875609Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sandra G. Hart. 2006. Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 50, 9 (Oct 2006), 904--908. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sandra G. Hart and Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In Human Mental Workload, Peter A. Hancock and Najmedin Meshkati (Eds.). Advances in Psychology, Vol. 52. North-Holland, 139 -- 183. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166--4115(08)62386--9Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marc Hassenzahl, Michael Burmester, and Franz Koller. 1998. AttrakDiff work model and measuring tool. (1998). http://attrakdiff.de/index-en.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Pascal Knierim, Valentin Schwind, Anna Maria Feit, Florian Nieuwenhuizen, and Niels Henze. 2018. Physical Keyboards in Virtual Reality: Analysis of Typing Performance and Effects of Avatar Hands. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. ACM Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173919Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. Scott MacKenzie and R. William Soukoreff. 2003. Phrase Sets for Evaluating Text Entry Techniques. In CHI '03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 754--755. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/765891.765971Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mark McGill, Daniel Boland, Roderick Murray-Smith, and Stephen Brewster. 2015. A Dose of Reality: Overcoming Usability Challenges in VR Head-Mounted Displays. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15. ACM Press, 2143--2152. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702382Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ramesh Raskar, Greg Welch, Matt Cutts, Adam Lake, Lev Stesin, and Henry Fuchs. 1998. The Office of the Future: A Unified Approach to Image-Based Modeling and Spatially Immersive Displays. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH '98). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 179--188. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/280814.280861Google ScholarDigital Library
- Katie A. Siek, Yvonne Rogers, and Kay H. Connelly. 2005. Fat Finger Worries: How Older and Younger Users Physically Interact with PDAs. In Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2005, Maria Francesca Costabile and Fabio Paternò (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 267--280.Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. William Soukoreff and I. Scott MacKenzie. 2003. Metrics for Text Entry Research: An Evaluation of MSD and KSPC, and a New Unified Error Metric. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 113--120. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/642611.642632Google ScholarDigital Library
- James Walker, Bochao Li, Keith Vertanen, and Scott Kuhl. 2017. Efficient Typing on a Visually Occluded Physical Keyboard. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 5457--5461. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025783Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Opportunities and Challenges of Text Input in Portable Virtual Reality
Recommendations
Physical Keyboards in Virtual Reality: Analysis of Typing Performance and Effects of Avatar Hands
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsEntering text is one of the most common tasks when interacting with computing systems. Virtual Reality (VR) presents a challenge as neither the user's hands nor the physical input devices are directly visible. Hence, conventional desktop peripherals are ...
Visualizing the keyboard in virtual reality for enhancing immersive experience
SIGGRAPH '17: ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 PostersRecently, virtual reality (VR) becomes more and more popular and provides users an immersive experience with a head-mounted display (HMD). However, in some applications, users have to interact with physical objects while immersed in VR. With a non-see-...
Headset removal for virtual and mixed reality
SIGGRAPH '17: ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 TalksVirtual Reality (VR) has advanced significantly in recent years and allows users to explore novel environments (both real and imaginary), play games, and engage with media in a way that is unprecedentedly immersive. However, compared to physical reality,...
Comments