skip to main content
10.1145/3334480.3382920acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Opportunities and Challenges of Text Input in Portable Virtual Reality

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Text input in virtual reality is not widespread outside of labs, although being increasingly researched. Current setups require powerful components that are expensive or not portable, hence preventing effective in-the-wild use. Latest technological advances enable portable mixed reality experiences on smartphones. In this work, we propose a portable low-fidelity solution for text input in mixed reality on a physical keyboard that employs accessible off-the-shelf components. Through a user study with 24 participants, we show that our prototype leads to a significantly higher text input performance compared to soft keyboards. However, it falls behind on copy editing compared to soft keyboards. Qualitative inquiries revealed that participants enjoyed the ample display space and perceived the accompanied privacy as beneficial. Finally, we conclude with challenges and future research that builds upon the presented findings.

References

  1. John Brooke. 1995. SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189 (Nov 1995). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228593520_SUS_A_quick_and_dirty_usability_scaleGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Steven Feiner, Blair MacIntyre, Marcus Haupt, and Eliot Solomon. 1993. Windows on the world: 2 D windows for 3 D augmented reality. In ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 145--155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Anna Maria Feit, Daryl Weir, and Antti Oulasvirta. 2016. How We Type: Movement Strategies and Performance in Everyday Typing. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16. ACM Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858233Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Jens Grubert, Eyal Ofek, Michel Pahud, and Per Ola Kristensson. 2018. The Office of the Future: Virtual, Portable, and Global. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 38, 6 (Nov 2018), 125--133. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mcg.2018.2875609Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Sandra G. Hart. 2006. Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 50, 9 (Oct 2006), 904--908. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Sandra G. Hart and Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In Human Mental Workload, Peter A. Hancock and Najmedin Meshkati (Eds.). Advances in Psychology, Vol. 52. North-Holland, 139 -- 183. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166--4115(08)62386--9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Marc Hassenzahl, Michael Burmester, and Franz Koller. 1998. AttrakDiff work model and measuring tool. (1998). http://attrakdiff.de/index-en.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Pascal Knierim, Valentin Schwind, Anna Maria Feit, Florian Nieuwenhuizen, and Niels Henze. 2018. Physical Keyboards in Virtual Reality: Analysis of Typing Performance and Effects of Avatar Hands. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. ACM Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173919Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. I. Scott MacKenzie and R. William Soukoreff. 2003. Phrase Sets for Evaluating Text Entry Techniques. In CHI '03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 754--755. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/765891.765971Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Mark McGill, Daniel Boland, Roderick Murray-Smith, and Stephen Brewster. 2015. A Dose of Reality: Overcoming Usability Challenges in VR Head-Mounted Displays. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15. ACM Press, 2143--2152. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702382Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ramesh Raskar, Greg Welch, Matt Cutts, Adam Lake, Lev Stesin, and Henry Fuchs. 1998. The Office of the Future: A Unified Approach to Image-Based Modeling and Spatially Immersive Displays. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH '98). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 179--188. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/280814.280861Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Katie A. Siek, Yvonne Rogers, and Kay H. Connelly. 2005. Fat Finger Worries: How Older and Younger Users Physically Interact with PDAs. In Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2005, Maria Francesca Costabile and Fabio Paternò (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 267--280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. R. William Soukoreff and I. Scott MacKenzie. 2003. Metrics for Text Entry Research: An Evaluation of MSD and KSPC, and a New Unified Error Metric. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 113--120. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/642611.642632Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. James Walker, Bochao Li, Keith Vertanen, and Scott Kuhl. 2017. Efficient Typing on a Visually Occluded Physical Keyboard. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 5457--5461. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025783Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Opportunities and Challenges of Text Input in Portable Virtual Reality

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2020
        4474 pages
        ISBN:9781450368193
        DOI:10.1145/3334480

        Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 April 2020

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • abstract

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format