skip to main content
10.1145/3335595.3335614acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesinteraccionConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Analysis of Accessibility in Cooking Hobs Interfaces

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

The interaction with consume products has been changing due to the development of the technology. Appliances in general and particularly cooking hobs have gone from having physical controls to have touch controls. For that reason, the main objective of this paper is to analyse the impact of that changes on the interfaces in terms of accessibility. Therefore, a comparison between the different interfaces has been made by analysing four different cooking hobs. The analysis determines, on the one hand, the demand capacities to use the cooking hobs and, on the other hand, the number of excluded people for the interaction with each of selected cooking hobs. The results define the main characteristics to consider when designing accessible cooking hobs such as; controls, feedbacks and graphic elements.

References

  1. World Health Organization, "World report on ageing and health," 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas, "Panorámica de la discapacidad en España," Boletín Inf. del Inst. Nac. Estadística, pp. 1--12, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. González-de-Heredia, "Integración de aspectos de envejecimiento en la metodología de diseño centrado en las personas del DBZ." Escuela Politécnica Superior de Mondragon Unibertsitatea, p. 90, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. H. Persson, H. Åhman, A. A. Yngling, and J. Gulliksen, "Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: different concepts---one goal? On the concept of accessibility---historical, methodological and philosophical aspects," Univers. Access Inf. Soc., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 505--526, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Dong, R. Li, Z. Ji, and C. He, "Research on Multi Human-Computer Interface Design of Household Electrical Appliances," vol. 10917, pp. 255--270, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. T. Hackos and J. C. Redish, User and Task Analysis for Interface Design. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. B. Martin and B. M. Hanington, Universal methods of design: 100 ways to research complex problems, develop innovative ideas, and design effective solutions. Rockport Publishers, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cambridge Engineering Design Center, "Calculating exclusion for user journeys." {Online}. Available: http://calc.inclusivedesigntoolkit.com/. {Accessed: 19-Feb-2019}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Analysis of Accessibility in Cooking Hobs Interfaces

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      Interacción '19: Proceedings of the XX International Conference on Human Computer Interaction
      June 2019
      296 pages
      ISBN:9781450371766
      DOI:10.1145/3335595

      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 June 2019

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • extended-abstract
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Interacción '19 Paper Acceptance Rate62of90submissions,69%Overall Acceptance Rate109of163submissions,67%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader