skip to main content
10.1145/3338286.3344397acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Alexa, I'm in Need!: Investigating the Potential and Barriers of Voice Assistance Services for Social Work

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Due the involved counselling activities, the profession of social work might provide a promising, yet so far uninvestigated application field for voice assistants. To explore requirements and barriers for voice-based services in the field of social work, we conducted focus group sessions with 41 professionals. During the group discussions and through a questionnaire, we collected requirements for applying voice assistants in this professional setting and corresponding application ideas. Overall, the participants expected a positive impact of voice assistants on their profession. While the protection of the clients' sensitive data and the risk of their reduced social interactions need to be considered, the participants saw high potential in documentation services and the cooperative guidance of clients by human professionals and voice assistants. Future research should investigate the design of this interplay and study appropriate handover strategies between human experts and virtual assistants for specific social work services.

References

  1. Tawfiq Ammari, Jofish Kaye, Janice Y. Tsai, and Frank Bentley. 2019. Music, Search, and IoT: How People (Really) Use Voice Assistants. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 26, 3, Article 17 (April 2019), 28 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3311956Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Matthias Baldauf, Raffael Bösch, Christian Frei, Fabian Hautle, and Marc Jenny. 2018. Exploring Requirements and Opportunities of Conversational User Interfaces for the Cognitively Impaired. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (MobileHCI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 119--126. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3236112.3236128Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Michael Braun, Nora Broy, Bastian Pfleging, and Florian Alt. 2017. A Design Space for Conversational In-vehicle Information Systems. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 79, 8 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3098279.3122122Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Manuel Bronstein. 2019. Bringing you the next-generation Google Assistant. https://www.blog.google/products/assistant/next-generation-google-assistant-io. (2019). Accessed: 2019-05-20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Daniel Fitton, Janet C Read, Gavin Sim, and Brendan Cassidy. 2018. Co-designing Voice User Interfaces with Teenagers in the Context of Smart Homes. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 55--66. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3202744Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Shih-Chieh Lin, Chang-Hong Hsu, Walter Talamonti, Yunqi Zhang, Steve Oney, Jason Mars, and Lingjia Tang. 2018. Adasa: A Conversational In-Vehicle Digital Assistant for Advanced Driver Assistance Features. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 531--542. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3242587.3242593Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Daniel McDuff and Mary Czerwinski. 2018. Designing Emotionally Sentient Agents. Commun. ACM 61, 12 (Nov. 2018), 74--83. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3186591Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Stuart Reeves, Martin Porcheron, Joel E. Fischer, Heloisa Candello, Donald McMillan, Moira McGregor, Robert J. Moore, Rein Sikveland, Alex S. Taylor, Julia Velkovska, and Moustafa Zouinar. 2018. Voice-based Conversational UX Studies and Design. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article W38, 8 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3170619Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Roni Reid. 2018. Everything Alexa learned in 2018. https://blog.aboutamazon.com/devices/everything-alexa-learned-in-2018. (2018). Accessed: 2019-05-20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Alexa, I'm in Need!: Investigating the Potential and Barriers of Voice Assistance Services for Social Work

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobileHCI '19: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
      October 2019
      646 pages
      ISBN:9781450368254
      DOI:10.1145/3338286

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 October 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader