skip to main content
10.1145/3338840.3355648acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesracsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Abnormal object detection and recognition in the complex construction site via cloud computing

Published:24 September 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

For the construction site image understanding, object detection and recognition are the most important tasks. In the construction site with electrical equipment, the scene need to be monitored carefully to avoid accident. In our work, one anomaly detection method via the cloud computation is proposed. The method consists of the one-stage deep learning object detection model and the one-class classification. The one-stage object detection method detects and recognizes the objects in the scenes. Then, the one-class SVM alarms the abnormal region. The proposal algorithm has been tested on several scenes of real construction sites, and achieves fine results practicably.

References

  1. S. Canu, Y. Grandvalet, V. Guigue, and A. Rakotomamonjy. 2005. SVM and Kernel Methods Matlab Toolbox. Perception Systèmes et Information, INSA de Rouen, Rouen, France. (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Navneet Dalal and Bill Triggs. 2005. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Vol. 1. IEEE, 886--893.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. P. F. Felzenszwalb, R. B. Girshick, D. McAllester, and D. Ramanan. 2010. Object Detection with Discriminatively Trained Part-Based Models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 32, 9 (Sept 2010), 1627--1645.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ross Girshick. 2015. Fast r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 1440--1448.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ross Girshick, Jeff Donahue, Trevor Darrell, and Jitendra Malik. 2014. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 580--587.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ross Girshick, Jeff Donahue, Trevor Darrell, and Jitendra Malik. 2014. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 580--587.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Giovanni Gualdi, Andrea Prati, and Rita Cucchiara. 2012. Multistage particle windows for fast and accurate object detection. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 34, 8 (2012), 1589--1604.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kaiming He, Georgia Gkioxari, Piotr Dollår, and Ross Girshick. 2017. Mask r-cnn. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.06870 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 770--778.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Huang Jie and Zhang Hai. 2008. Plane detection based on support vector machine and information fusion. Electronics Optics & Control 15, 9 (2008), 6--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E Hinton. 2012. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of Advances in neural information processing systems. 1097--1105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Yann LeCun, Léon Bottou, Yoshua Bengio, and Patrick Haffner. 1998. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE 86, 11 (1998), 2278--2324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Wei Liu, Dragomir Anguelov, Dumitru Erhan, Christian Szegedy, Scott Reed, Cheng-Yang Fu, and Alexander C Berg. 2016. SSD: Single shot multibox detector. In Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). Springer, 21--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. D. G. Lowe. 1999. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Vol. 2. 1150--1157 vol. 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Timo Ojala, Matti Pietikainen, and David Harwood. 1994. Performance evaluation of texture measures with classification based on Kullback discrimination of distributions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Vol. 1. IEEE, 582--585.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Joseph Redmon, Santosh Divvala, Ross Girshick, and Ali Farhadi. 2016. You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 779--788.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Joseph Redmon and Ali Farhadi. 2017. YOLO9000: better, faster, stronger. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 7263--7271.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Joseph Redmon and Ali Farhadi. 2018. Yolov3: An incremental improvement. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.02767 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Bernhard Schölkopf, John C Platt, John Shawe-Taylor, Alex J Smola, and Robert C Williamson. 2001. Estimating the support of a high-dimensional distribution. Neural computation 13, 7 (2001), 1443--1471.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. 2015. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. (2015), 14 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Christian Szegedy, Wei Liu, Yangqing Jia, Pierre Sermanet, Scott Reed, Dragomir Anguelov, Dumitru Erhan, Vincent Vanhoucke, and Andrew Rabinovich. 2015. Going Deeper With Convolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Tian Wang and Hichem Snoussi. 2014. Detection of abnormal visual events via global optical flow orientation histogram. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 9, 6 (2014), 988--998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Abnormal object detection and recognition in the complex construction site via cloud computing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      RACS '19: Proceedings of the Conference on Research in Adaptive and Convergent Systems
      September 2019
      323 pages
      ISBN:9781450368438
      DOI:10.1145/3338840
      • Conference Chair:
      • Chih-Cheng Hung,
      • General Chair:
      • Qianbin Chen,
      • Program Chairs:
      • Xianzhong Xie,
      • Christian Esposito,
      • Jun Huang,
      • Juw Won Park,
      • Qinghua Zhang

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 September 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      RACS '19 Paper Acceptance Rate56of188submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,581submissions,25%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader