skip to main content
research-article

Efficient Indoor Localization Based on Geomagnetism

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 August 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Geomagnetism is promising for indoor localization due to its omnipresence, high stability, and availability of magnetometers in smartphones. Previous works often fuse it with pedometer via particles, which are computationally intensive and make strong user behavior assumptions. To overcome that, we propose Magil, an approach leveraging geomagnetism for indoor localization. To our best knowledge, this is the first piece of work using geomagnetism for smartphone localization without the need of pedometer or user walking model. Magil is applicable to any open or complex indoor environment. In the offline phase, Magil collects and stores geomagnetic fingerprints while surveyors walk indoors. In the online phase, it employs a fast algorithm to match the geomagnetic variation of the target with the stored fingerprints. Given closely matched segments, Magil constructs user trajectory efficiently with a modified shortest path formulation by selecting and connecting these matched segments.

To further improve accuracy and deployability, we propose MagFi, which extends Magil by fusing it with Wi-Fi. MagFi further collects opportunistic Wi-Fi RSSI for fingerprint construction. We have implemented both Magil and MagFi and conducted extensive experiments in our campus. Results show that our schemes outperform state-of-the-art schemes by a wide margin (often cutting localization error by 30%).

References

  1. P. Bahl and V. N. Padmanabhan. 2000. RADAR: An in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM’00), Vol. 2. 775--784.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Agata Brajdic and Robert Harle. 2013. Walk detection and step counting on unconstrained smartphones. In Proceedtigs of the ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’13). 225--234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jaewoo Chung, Matt Donahoe, Chris Schmandt, Ig-Jae Kim, Pedram Razavai, and Micaela Wiseman. 2011. Indoor location sensing using geo-magnetism. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys’11). 141--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Frassl, M. Angermann, M. Lichtenstern, P. Robertson, B. J. Julian, and M. Doniec. 2013. Magnetic maps of indoor environments for precise localization of legged and non-legged locomotion. In Proceedings of the IEEE RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (RSJ IROS’13). 913--920.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dongsoo Han, Sukhoon Jung, Minkyu Lee, and Giwan Yoon. 2014. Building a practical Wi-Fi-based indoor navigation system. IEEE Perv. Comput. 13, 2 (Apr. 2014), 72--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Suining He and S.-H. Gary Chan. 2016. Wi-Fi fingerprint-based indoor positioning: Recent advances and comparisons. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 18, 1 (2016), 466--490.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Suining He and Kang G. Shin. 2018. Geomagnetism for smartphone-based indoor localization: Challenges, advances, and comparisons. ACM Comput. Surv. 50, 6 (2018), 97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Sebastian Hilsenbeck, Dmytro Bobkov, Georg Schroth, Robert Huitl, and Eckehard Steinbach. 2014. Graph-based data fusion of pedometer and WiFi measurements for mobile indoor positioning. In Proceedings of the ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’14). 147--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Kendall, M. Grimes, and R. Cipolla. 2015. PoseNet: A convolutional network for real-time 6-DOF camera relocalization. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Eamonn Keogh, Kaushik Chakrabarti, Michael Pazzani, and Sharad Mehrotra. 2001. Dimensionality reduction for fast similarity search in large time series databases. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 3, 3 (2001), 263--286.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Binghao Li, T. Gallagher, A. G. Dempster, and C. Rizos. 2012. How feasible is the use of magnetic field alone for indoor positioning? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN’12). 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Fan Li, Chunshui Zhao, Guanzhong Ding, Jian Gong, Chenxing Liu, and Feng Zhao. 2012. A reliable and accurate indoor localization method using phone inertial sensors. In Proceedings of the ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’12). 421--430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mingkuan Li, Ning Liu, Qun Niu, Chang Liu, S.-H. Gary Chan, and Chengying Gao. 2018. SweepLoc: Automatic video-based indoor localization by camera sweeping. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wear. Ubiq. Technol. 2, 3, Article 120 (Sep. 2018), 25 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Dimitrios Lymberopoulos, Jie Liu, Xue Yang, Romit Roy Choudhury, Vlado Handziski, and Souvik Sen. 2015. A realistic evaluation and comparison of indoor location technologies: Experiences and lessons learned. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. ACM, 178--189. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Ma, J. Qian, P. Li, R. Ying, and P. Liu. 2013. Indoor localization based on magnetic anomalies and pedestrian dead reckoning. In Proceedings of the Institute of Navigation GNSS Conference (ION GNSS+’13). 1033--1038.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Andrew Markham and Niki Trigoni. 2012. Magneto-inductive networked rescue system (MINERS): Taking sensor networks underground. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN’12). 317--328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. NetEase, Inc. 2015. Android performance test tool-CPU, memory, network traffic, starting time, battery current and status. Retrieved from https://github.com/NetEase/Emmagee.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Qun Niu, Mingkuan Li, Suining He, Chengying Gao, S. H. Gary Chan, and Xiaonan Luo. 2019. Resource-efficient and automated image-based indoor localization. ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. 15, 2 (Feb. 2019), 1--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jun-geun Park and Seth Teller. 2014. Motion Compatibility for Indoor Localization. Technical Report. MIT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Yuanchao Shu, Cheng Bo, Guobin Shen, Chunshui Zhao, Liqun Li, and Feng Zhao. 2015. Magicol: Indoor localization using pervasive magnetic field and opportunistic WiFi sensing. IEEE J. Select. Area Commun. 33, 7 (Jul. 2015), 1443--1457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Yuanchao Shu, Kang G. Shin, Tian He, and Jiming Chen. 2015. Last-mile navigation using smartphones. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiCom’15). 512--524. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Temple F. Smith and Michael S. Waterman. 1981. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Molec. Biol. 147, 1 (1981), 195--197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Kalyan Pathapati Subbu, Brandon Gozick, and Ram Dantu. 2013. LocateMe: Magnetic-fields-based indoor localization using smartphones. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 4, 4, Article 73 (Oct. 2013), 27 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. X. Tian, R. Shen, D. Liu, Y. Wen, and X. Wang. 2017. Performance analysis of RSS fingerprinting based indoor localization. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 16, 10 (Oct. 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. He Wang, Souvik Sen, Ahmed Elgohary, Moustafa Farid, Moustafa Youssef, and Romit Roy Choudhury. 2012. No need to war-drive: Unsupervised indoor localization. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys’12). 197--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Oliver Woodman and Robert Harle. 2008. Pedestrian localisation for indoor environments. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 114--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Chenshu Wu, Jingao Xu, Zheng Yang, Nicholas D. Lane, and Zuwei Yin. 2017. Gain without pain: Accurate WiFi-based localization using fingerprint spatial gradient. Proc. ACM Interact. Mobile Wear. Ubiq. Technol. 1, 2 (Jun. 2017), 29:1--29:19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Chenshu Wu, Zheng Yang, and Yunhao Liu. 2015. Smartphones based crowdsourcing for indoor localization. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 14, 2 (2015), 444--457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Hang Wu, Suining He, and S.-H. Gary Chan. 2017. Accurate and efficient localization with geomagnetism-pedometer graphical model fusion. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Systems (IEEE MASS’17).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Hang Wu, Suining He, and S.-H. Gary Chan. 2017. Efficient sequence matching and path construction for geomagnetic indoor localization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks (EWSN’17). 156--167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaishun Wu, Jiang Xiao, Youwen Yi, Dihu Chen, Xiaonan Luo, and Lionel M. Ni. 2013. CSI-based indoor localization. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 24, 7 (Jul. 2013), 1300--1309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Zhuoling Xiao, Hongkai Wen, A. Markham, and N. Trigoni. 2014. Lightweight map matching for indoor localisation using conditional random fields. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN’14). 131--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. H. Xie, T. Gu, X. Tao, H. Ye, and J. Lu. 2016. A reliability-augmented particle filter for magnetic fingerprinting based indoor localization on smartphone. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 15, 8 (Aug. 2016), 1877--1892.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Hongwei Xie, Tao Gu, Xianping Tao, Haibo Ye, and Jian Lv. 2014. MaLoc: A practical magnetic fingerprinting approach to indoor localization using smartphones. In Proceedings of the ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’14). 243--253. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Weixing Xue, Weining Qiu, Xianghong Hua, and Kegen Yu. 2017. Improved Wi-Fi RSSI measurement for indoor localization. IEEE Sens. J. 17, 7 (2017), 2224--2230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Moustafa Youssef and Ashok Agrawala. 2005. The Horus WLAN location determination system. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys’05). 205--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Chi Zhang, Jun Luo, and Jianxin Wu. 2014. A dual-sensor enabled indoor localization system with crowdsensing spot survey. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS’14). IEEE, 75--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Chi Zhang, Kalyan P. Subbu, Jun Luo, and Jianxin Wu. 2015. GROPING: Geomagnetism and crowdsensing powered indoor navigation. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 14, 2 (2015), 387--400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Pengfei Zhou, Mo Li, and Guobin Shen. 2014. Use it free: Instantly knowing your phone attitude. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. ACM, 605--616. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Efficient Indoor Localization Based on Geomagnetism

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
        ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 15, Issue 4
        November 2019
        373 pages
        ISSN:1550-4859
        EISSN:1550-4867
        DOI:10.1145/3352582
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 August 2019
        • Accepted: 1 June 2019
        • Revised: 1 March 2019
        • Received: 1 August 2018
        Published in tosn Volume 15, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format