skip to main content
10.1145/3347146.3359342acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Deep Multiple Instance Learning for Human Trajectory Identification

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 November 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Extracting identifiable information from human trajectories is a fundamental task in many location-based services (LBS). However, various mobility patterns underlain in human trajectories are difficult to model by existing models. Moreover, we could hardly define a clear user set for user identification because the set of users are dynamic and changing everyday. Bearing these in mind, we apply a deep multiple instance learning method to handle the multimodal mobility patterns in a weak-supervised learning way, and address the dynamic user set problems via a pairwise loss with negative sampling. We utilize a multi-head attention mechanism to automatically extract multiple aspects and match the corresponding information between query trajectories and historical trajectories. Our method shows a good identification accuracy on three human GPS trajectory data sets comparing with baseline methods.

References

  1. Donald J. Berndt and James Clifford. 1994. Using Dynamic Time Warping to Find Patterns in Time Series. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (AAAIWS'94). AAAI Press, 359--370. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3000850.3000887Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. P. C. Besse, B. Guillouet, J. Loubes, and F. Royer. 2016. Review and Perspective for Distance-Based Clustering of Vehicle Trajectories. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 17, 11 (Nov 2016), 3306--3317. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2547641Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Qiang Gao, Fan Zhou, Kunpeng Zhang, Goce Trajcevski, Xucheng Luo, and Fengli Zhang. 2017. Identifying human mobility via trajectory embeddings. In Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 1689--1695.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Felix Hausdorff. 1978. Grundzüge der mengenlehre. Vol. 61. American Mathematical Soc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Comput. 9, 8 (Nov. 1997), 1735--1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Elad Hoffer and Nir Ailon. 2015. Deep metric learning using Triplet network.. In ICLR (Workshop), Yoshua Bengio and Yann LeCun (Eds.). http://dblp.unitrier.de/db/conf/iclr/iclr2015w.html#HofferA14Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Maximilian Ilse, Jakub M. Tomczak, and Max Welling. 2018. Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learning. In ICML (JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings), Vol. 80. JMLR.org, 2132--2141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Xiucheng Li, Kaiqi Zhao, Gao Cong, Christian S Jensen, and Wei Wei. 2018. Deep representation learning for trajectory similarity computation. In 2018 IEEE 34th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE, 617--628.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. Schuster and K.K. Paliwal. 1997. Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Networks. Trans. Sig. Proc. 45, 11 (Nov. 1997), 2673--2681. https://doi.org/10.1109/78.650093Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Ł ukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is All you Need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, I.Guyon, U.V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett (Eds.). Curran Associates, Inc., 6000--6010. http://papers.nips.cc/paper/7181-attention-is-all-you-need.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Michail Vlachos, Dimitrios Gunopoulos, and George Kollios. 2002. Discovering Similar Multidimensional Trajectories. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE '02). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 673-. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=876875.878994Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Li Yao, Jordan Prosky, Eric Poblenz, Ben Covington, and Kevin Lyman. 2018. Weakly supervised medical diagnosis and localization from multiple resolutions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.07703 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Fan Zhou, Qiang Gao, Goce Trajcevski, Kunpeng Zhang, Ting Zhong, and Fengli Zhang. 2018. Trajectory-user linking via variational autoencoder. In Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 3212--3218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Zhi-Hua Zhou. 2017. A brief introduction to weakly supervised learning. National Science Review 5, 1 (2017), 44--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Deep Multiple Instance Learning for Human Trajectory Identification

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGSPATIAL '19: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
          November 2019
          648 pages

          Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 5 November 2019

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • poster
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          SIGSPATIAL '19 Paper Acceptance Rate34of161submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader