skip to main content
10.1145/3355088.3365159acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagessiggraph-asiaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

PaintersView: Automatic Suggestion of Optimal Viewpoints for 3D Texture Painting

Published:17 November 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Although 3D texture painting has an advantage of making it easy to grasp the overall shape compared with a method of drawing directly onto a UV map, a disadvantage is unpainted (or distorted) regions appearing in the result due to, for example, self-occluded parts. Thus, in order to perform painting without leaving unpainted parts, sequential change of viewpoints is necessary. However, this process is highly time-consuming. To address this problem, we propose an automatic suggestion of optimal viewpoints for 3D texture painting. As the user paints a model, the system searches for optimal viewpoints for subsequent painting and presents them as multiple suggestions. The user switches to a suggested viewpoint by clicking on a suggestion. We conducted a user study and confirmed that the proposed workflow was effective for 3D texture painting envisioned by users.

References

  1. Hsiang-Ting Chen, Tovi Grossman, Li-Yi Wei, Ryan M Schmidt, Björn Hartmann, George Fitzmaurice, and Maneesh Agrawala. 2014. History assisted view authoring for 3D models. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2027–2036. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Enrique Dunn and Jan-Michael Frahm. 2009. Next Best View Planning for Active Model Improvement. In Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC). BMVA Press, 53:1–53:11. https://doi.org/10.5244/C.23.53Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Chi-Wing Fu, Jiazhi Xia, and Ying He. 2010. LayerPaint: A Multi-Layer Interactive 3D Painting Interface. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 811–820. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753445Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Azam Khan, Ben Komalo, Jos Stam, George Fitzmaurice, and Gordon Kurtenbach. 2005. Hovercam: Interactive 3D Navigation for Proximal Object Inspection. In Proceedings of the 2005 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games. ACM, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/1053427.1053439Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Yuki Koyama, Daisuke Sakamoto, and Takeo Igarashi. 2014. Crowd-Powered Parameter Analysis for Visual Design Exploration. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647386Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Nikolaos A Massios, Robert B Fisher, 1998. A best next view selection algorithm incorporating a quality criterion. In Proceedings of the 9th British Machine Vision Conference. Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh, 78:1–78:10. https://doi.org/10.5244/C.12.78Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Michaël Ortega and Thomas Vincent. 2014. Direct Drawing on 3D Shapes with Automated Camera Control. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2047–2050. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557242Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Richard Pito. 1999. A solution to the next best view problem for automated surface acquisition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 21, 10(1999), 1016–1030. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.799908Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. PaintersView: Automatic Suggestion of Optimal Viewpoints for 3D Texture Painting
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SA '19: SIGGRAPH Asia 2019 Technical Briefs
          November 2019
          121 pages
          ISBN:9781450369459
          DOI:10.1145/3355088

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 17 November 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate178of869submissions,20%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format