skip to main content
10.1145/3357384.3357927acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Path Travel Time Estimation using Attribute-related Hybrid Trajectories Network

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 November 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Estimation of path travel time provides great value to applications like bus line designs and route plannings. Existing approaches are mainly based on single-source trajectory datasets that are usually large in size to ensure a satisfactory performance. This leads to two limitations: 1) Large-scale data may not always be attainable, e.g. city-scale public bus data is usually small compared to taxi data due to relative fewer bus trips in a day. 2) Considering only single-source trajectory data neglects the potential estimation-improving insights of external data, e.g. trajectory dataset of other vehicle sources obtained from the same geographical region. A challenge is how to effectively utilize such other trajectory sources. Moreover, existing work does not attend the important attributes of a trajectory including vehicle ID, day of week, rainfall level etc., which are important for estimating the path travel time. Motivated by these and the recent successes of neural network models, we propose Attribute-related Hybrid Trajectories Network~(AtHy-TNet), a neural model that effectively utilizes the attribute correlations, as well as the spatial and temporal relationships across hybrid trajectory data. We apply this to a novel problem of estimating path travel time of a type of vehicles using a hybrid trajectory dataset that includes trajectories from other vehicle types. We demonstrate in our experiments the benefits of considering hybrid data for travel time estimation, and show that AtHy-TNet significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods on real-world trajectory datasets.

References

  1. Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0473 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Rich Caruana. 1997. Multitask learning. Machine learning , Vol. 28, 1 (1997), 41--75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Rohan Chandra, Uttaran Bhattacharya, Aniket Bera, and Dinesh Manocha. 2018. TraPHic: Trajectory Prediction in Dense and Heterogeneous Traffic Using Weighted Interactions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.04767 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Djork-Arné Clevert, Thomas Unterthiner, and Sepp Hochreiter. 2015. Fast and accurate deep network learning by exponential linear units (elus). arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.07289 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jian Dai, Bin Yang, Chenjuan Guo, Christian S Jensen, and Jilin Hu. 2016. Path cost distribution estimation using trajectory data. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment , Vol. 10, 3 (2016), 85--96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Xavier Glorot, Antoine Bordes, and Yoshua Bengio. 2011. Deep sparse rectifier neural networks. In Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics . 315--323.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Google. 2019. Google Maps Platform. https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Agrim Gupta, Justin Johnson, Li Fei-Fei, Silvio Savarese, and Alexandre Alahi. 2018. Social gan: Socially acceptable trajectories with generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . 2255--2264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 770--778.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural computation , Vol. 9, 8 (1997), 1735--1780.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jilin Hu, Chenjuan Guo, Bin Yang, Christian S Jensen, and Lu Chen. 2018. Recurrent Multi-Graph Neural Networks for Travel Cost Prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.05157 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Erik Jenelius and Haris N Koutsopoulos. 2018. Urban network travel time prediction based on a probabilistic principal component analysis model of probe data. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , Vol. 19, 2 (2018), 436--445.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Guolin Ke, Qi Meng, Thomas Finley, Taifeng Wang, Wei Chen, Weidong Ma, Qiwei Ye, and Tie-Yan Liu. 2017. Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 3146--3154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Yoon Kim. 2014. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.5882 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Yaguang Li, Kun Fu, Zheng Wang, Cyrus Shahabi, Jieping Ye, and Yan Liu. 2018. Multi-task representation learning for travel time estimation. In International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining,(KDD) .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Yang Li, Dimitrios Gunopulos, Cewu Lu, and Leonidas Guibas. 2017. Urban Travel Time Prediction using a Small Number of GPS Floating Cars. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM, 3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Yuexin Ma, Xinge Zhu, Sibo Zhang, Ruigang Yang, Wenping Wang, and Dinesh Manocha. 2018. TrafficPredict: Trajectory prediction for heterogeneous traffic-agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.02146 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Bei Pan, Ugur Demiryurek, and Cyrus Shahabi. 2012. Utilizing real-world transportation data for accurate traffic prediction. In 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE, 595--604.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Mahmood Rahmani, Haris N Koutsopoulos, and Erik Jenelius. 2017. Travel time estimation from sparse floating car data with consistent path inference: A fixed point approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies , Vol. 85 (2017), 628--643.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Xuan Song, Hiroshi Kanasugi, and Ryosuke Shibasaki. 2016. DeepTransport: Prediction and Simulation of Human Mobility and Transportation Mode at a Citywide Level.. In IJCAI, Vol. 16. 2618--2624.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Christian Szegedy, Wei Liu, Yangqing Jia, Pierre Sermanet, Scott Reed, Dragomir Anguelov, Dumitru Erhan, Vincent Vanhoucke, and Andrew Rabinovich. 2015. Going deeper with convolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Youze Tang, Andy Diwen Zhu, and Xiaokui Xiao. 2012. An efficient algorithm for mapping vehicle trajectories onto road networks. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM, 601--604.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Anirudh Vemula, Katharina Muelling, and Jean Oh. 2018. Social attention: Modeling attention in human crowds. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Dong Wang, Wei Cao, Mengwen Xu, and Jian Li. 2016a. Etcps: An effective and scalable traffic condition prediction system. In International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications. Springer, 419--436.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Dong Wang, Junbo Zhang, Wei Cao, Jian Li, and Yu Zheng. 2018. When Will You Arrive? Estimating Travel Time Based on Deep Neural Networks. AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Hongjian Wang, Xianfeng Tang, Yu-Hsuan Kuo, Daniel Kifer, and Zhenhui Li. 2019. A simple baseline for travel time estimation using large-scale trip data. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) , Vol. 10, 2 (2019), 19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jingyuan Wang, Qian Gu, Junjie Wu, Guannan Liu, and Zhang Xiong. 2016b. Traffic speed prediction and congestion source exploration: A deep learning method. In Data Mining (ICDM), 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on. IEEE, 499--508.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Yequan Wang, Minlie Huang, Li Zhao, et almbox. 2016c. Attention-based LSTM for aspect-level sentiment classification. In Proceedings of the 2016 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing . 606--615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Yilun Wang, Yu Zheng, and Yexiang Xue. 2014. Travel time estimation of a path using sparse trajectories. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining . ACM, 25--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Bin Yang, Chenjuan Guo, and Christian S Jensen. 2013. Travel cost inference from sparse, spatio temporally correlated time series using Markov models. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment , Vol. 6, 9 (2013), 769--780.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Jing Yuan, Yu Zheng, Xing Xie, and Guangzhong Sun. 2013. T-Drive: Enhancing Driving Directions with Taxi Drivers' Intelligence. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. , Vol. 25, 1 (2013), 220--232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Hanyuan Zhang, Hao Wu, Weiwei Sun, and Baihua Zheng. 2018. DeepTravel: a Neural Network Based Travel Time Estimation Model with Auxiliary Supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.02147 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Junbo Zhang, Yu Zheng, and Dekang Qi. 2017. Deep Spatio-Temporal Residual Networks for Citywide Crowd Flows Prediction.. In AAAI . 1655--1661.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Jing Zhao, Jiajie Xu, Rui Zhou, Pengpeng Zhao, Chengfei Liu, and Feng Zhu. 2018. On Prediction of User Destination by Sub-Trajectory Understanding: A Deep Learning based Approach. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 1413--1422.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Path Travel Time Estimation using Attribute-related Hybrid Trajectories Network

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CIKM '19: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
            November 2019
            3373 pages
            ISBN:9781450369763
            DOI:10.1145/3357384

            Copyright © 2019 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 3 November 2019

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            CIKM '19 Paper Acceptance Rate202of1,031submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

            Upcoming Conference

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader