skip to main content
10.1145/3360322.3360842acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

DUET: Towards a Portable Thermal Comfort Model

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 November 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Thermal comfort, achieved by estimating the thermal sensation of occupants, has long been an important research topic. Numerous models and systems have been developed to improve the estimates of the accuracy of thermal comfort. Many either require extra devices to be installed; or require occupants to provide frequent feedback hindering the large scale deployability of the system. Data-driven models separate the process of collecting data used to establish the thermal comfort model from the process of deploying the model, making these models portable in deployment. Recent studies on data-driven thermal comfort models often make use of a single model. A single model can introduce large errors in practice, as thermal comfort is highly dependent on a variety of contextual factors, such as building type, location, and so on. In this paper, we for the first time study the contextual adaptation involved in predicting the thermal comfort of individuals by training multi-task models. We develop a Dynamic MUlti-task PrEdiction on Thermal Comfort (DUET) model. A key idea of our model is to use metadata to automatically define multi-task. Fortunately, there are ongoing efforts in metadata development in buildings, e.g., Brick. We extract metadata from Brick and evaluate our model using the public ASHRAE dataset. We demonstrate that in terms of error rate, DUET outperforms PMV model by 39% and STL by 31%.

References

  1. ASHRAE (Atlanta, Georgia). ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2013: Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Liang Yang, Zimu Zheng, et al. A domain-assisted data driven model for thermal comfort prediction in buildings. In ACM e-Energy, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Joyce Kim et al. Personal comfort models: predicting individuals' thermal preference using occupant heating and cooling behavior and machine learning. Building and Environment, 129:96--106, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Daniel de Roux et al. Tax fraud detection for under-reporting declarations using an unsupervised machine learning approach. In ACM SIGKDD, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Richard de Dear, Gail Brager, and Donna Cooper. Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference. FINAL REPORT ASHRAE RP-884, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bharathan Balaji, Arka Bhattacharya, Gabriel Fierro, Jingkun Gao, et al. Brick: Towards a unified metadata schema for buildings. In ACM BuildSys'16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. ISO 7730: 2005. Ergonomics of the thermal environment - Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the pmv and ppd indices and local thermal comfort criteria.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Peter Xiang Gao and Srinivasan Keshav. Spot: a smart personalized office thermal control system. In Proc. ACM e-Energy'13, pages 237--246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Peter Xiang Gao and Srinivasan Keshav. Optimal personal comfort management using spot+. In ACM BuildSys'13, pages 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Alimohammad Rabbani and Srinivasan Keshav. The spot* personal thermal comfort system. In Proc. ACM BuildSys'16, pages 75--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Varick L Erickson and Alberto E Cerpa. Thermovote: participatory sensing for efficient building hvac conditioning. In Proc. ACM BuildSys'12, pages 9--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Abraham Hang-yat Lam et al. An occupant-participatory approach for thermal comfort enhancement and energy conservation in buildings. In ACM e-Energy'14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Shaozhi Ye and S Felix Wu. Estimating the size of online social networks. International Journal of Social Computing and Cyber-Physical Systems, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. SenSys/BuildSys 2019. The data: Acquisition to analysis (data) workshop. https://workshopdata.github.io/DATA2019/, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Zheng Yang and Burcin Becerik-Gerber. The coupled effects of personalized occupancy profile based hvac schedules and room reassignment on building energy use. Energy and Buildings, 78:113--122, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Wei Zhang et al. Thermal comfort modeling for smart buildings: A fine-grained deep learning approach. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Juha Reunanen. Overfitting in making comparisons between variable selection methods. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(Mar):1371--1382, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jason Koh, Dezhi Hong, Rajesh Gupta, Kamin Whitehouse, Hongning Wang, and Yuvraj Agarwal. Plaster: An integration, benchmark, and development framework for metadata normalization methods. In ACM BuildSys'18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Gabe Fierro et al. Mortar: an open testbed for portable building analytics. In ACM BuildSys'18, pages 172--181.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rich Caruana. Multitask learning. Machine Learning, 28(1):41--75, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sinno Jialin Pan and Qiang Yang. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 22(10):1345--1359, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Yu Zhang and Qiang Yang. A survey on multi-task learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.08114, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Z. Wu et al. Deep neural networks employing multi-task learning and stacked bottleneck features for speech synthesis. In IEEE ICASSP, pages 4460--4464, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. C. Yuan et al. Multi-task sparse learning with beta process prior for action recognition. In Proceedings of IEEE CVPR, pages 423--429, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. X. Wang et al. Boosted multi-task learning for face verification with applications to web image and video search. In Proc. of IEEE CVPR, pages 142--149, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Zimu Zheng, Yuqi Wang, Quanyu Dai, Huadi Zheng, and Dan Wang. Metadata-driven task relation discovery for multi-task learning. In IJCAI, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Jiayu Zhou et al. A multi-task learning formulation for predicting disease progression. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD, pages 814--822, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Wikipedia. Metadata. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metadata, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Xianchao Zhang, Xiaotong Zhang, and Han Liu. Self-adapted multi-task clustering. In IJCAI, pages 2357--2363, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Chen et al. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proc. ACM KDD'16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Zimu Zheng et al. Data driven chiller sequencing for reducing hvac electricity consumption in commercial buildings. In ACM e-Energy, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Qiong Chen et al. Data-driven task allocation for multi-task transfer learning on the edge. In IEEE ICDCS, pages 1620--1626, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Zheng et al. An edge based data-driven chiller sequencing framework for hvac electricity consumption reduction in commercial buildings. In IEEE T-SUSC'19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. DUET: Towards a Portable Thermal Comfort Model

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        BuildSys '19: Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation
        November 2019
        413 pages
        ISBN:9781450370059
        DOI:10.1145/3360322

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 November 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        BuildSys '19 Paper Acceptance Rate40of131submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate148of500submissions,30%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader