skip to main content
10.1145/3361684.3361688acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiwoarConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Fluid intake recognition using inertial sensors

Published:06 January 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

As one of many uses of body-worn inertial sensors, health monitoring applications can have a significant impact on the quality of life for a user even with inexpensive consumer electronics. In this paper, we address fluid intake monitoring as an activity recognition problem and conduct a user-study with 41 participants. We show that while an approach with a wrist-mounted sensor outperforms an approach with a head-mounted sensor, they can both be considered viable options for such a system. Furthermore we compare the classification performance of a hybrid CNN-LSTM artificial neural network with simpler baseline classifiers.

References

  1. Oliver Amft, David Bannach, Gerald Pirkl, Matthias Kreil, and Paul Lukowicz. 2010. Towards wearable sensing-based assessment of fluid intake. In Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), 2010 8th IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 298--303.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Dario Ortega Anderez, Ahmad Lotfi, and Caroline Langensiepen. 2018. A Hierarchical Approach in Food and Drink Intake Recognition Using Wearable Inertial Sensors. In Proceedings of the 11th PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference. ACM, 552--557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Andreas Bulling, Ulf Blanke, and Bernt Schiele. 2014. A tutorial on human activity recognition using body-worn inertial sensors. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 46, 3 (2014), 33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Meng-Chieh Chiu, Shih-Ping Chang, Yu-Chen Chang, Hao-Hua Chu, Cheryl Chia-Hui Chen, Fei-Hsiu Hsiao, and Ju-Chun Ko. 2009. Playful bottle: a mobile social persuasion system to motivate healthy water intake. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Ubiquitous computing. ACM, 185--194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Diana Gomes and Inês Sousa. 2019. Real-Time Drink Trigger Detection in Free-living Conditions Using Inertial Sensors. Sensors 19, 9 (2019), 2145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Nils Y Hammerla, Shane Halloran, and Thomas Ploetz. 2016. Deep, convolutional, and recurrent models for human activity recognition using wearables. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.08880 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Shoya Ishimaru, Kai Kunze, Koichi Kise, Jens Weppner, Andreas Dengel, Paul Lukowicz, and Andreas Bulling. 2014. In the blink of an eye: combining head motion and eye blink frequency for activity recognition with Google Glass. In Proceedings of the 5th augmented human international conference. ACM, 15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Konstantinos Kyritsis, Christos Diou, and Anastasios Delopoulos. 2017. Food Intake Detection from Inertial Sensors Using LSTM Networks. In International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing. Springer, 411--418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Yehenew Mengistu, Minh Pham, Ha Manh Do, and Weihua Sheng. 2016. AutoHydrate: A wearable hydration monitoring system. In Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on. IEEE, 1857--1862.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Francisco Javier Ordóñez and Daniel Roggen. 2016. Deep convolutional and lstm recurrent neural networks for multimodal wearable activity recognition. Sensors 16, 1 (2016), 115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Michael N Sawka, Samuel N Cheuvront, and Robert Carter III. 2005. Human water needs. Nutrition reviews 63 (2005), S30--S39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sonia Soubam, Manisha Agrawal, and Vinayak Naik. 2017. Using an Arduino and a smartwatch to measure liquid consumed from any container. In Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS), 2017 9th International Conference on. IEEE, 464--467.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Johann P Wolff, Florian Grützmacher, Arne Wellnitz, and Christian Haubelt. 2018. Activity Recognition using Head Worn Inertial Sensors. In Proceedings of the 5th international Workshop on Sensor-based Activity Recognition and Interaction. ACM, 14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jianbo Yang, Minh Nhut Nguyen, Phyo Phyo San, Xiaoli Li, and Shonali Krishnaswamy. 2015. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks on Multi-channel Time Series for Human Activity Recognition.. In Ijcai, Vol. 15. 3995--4001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Koji Yatani and Khai N Truong. 2012. BodyScope: a wearable acoustic sensor for activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 341--350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ming Zeng, Le T Nguyen, Bo Yu, Ole J Mengshoel, Jiang Zhu, Pang Wu, and Joy Zhang. 2014. Convolutional neural networks for human activity recognition using mobile sensors. In Mobile Computing, Applications and Services (MobiCASE), 2014 6th International Conference on. IEEE, 197--205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. C Zimmermann, J Zeilfelder, T Bloecher, M Diehl, S Essig, and Wilhelm Stork. 2017. Evaluation of a smart drink monitoring device. In Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS), 2017 IEEE. IEEE, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Fluid intake recognition using inertial sensors
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          iWOAR '19: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Sensor-based Activity Recognition and Interaction
          September 2019
          76 pages
          ISBN:9781450377140
          DOI:10.1145/3361684

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 January 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          iWOAR '19 Paper Acceptance Rate10of11submissions,91%Overall Acceptance Rate46of73submissions,63%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader