skip to main content
10.1145/3366423.3380307acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Examining Protest as An Intervention to Reduce Online Prejudice: A Case Study of Prejudice Against Immigrants

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

There has been a growing concern about online users using social media to incite prejudice and hatred against other individuals or groups. While there has been research in developing automated techniques to identify online prejudice acts and hate speech, how to effectively counter online prejudice remains a societal challenge. Social protests, on the other hand, have been frequently used as an intervention for countering prejudice. However, research to date has not examined the relationship between protests and online prejudice. Using large-scale panel data collected from Twitter, we examine the changes in users’ tweeting behaviors relating to prejudice against immigrants following recent protests in the U.S. on immigration related topics. This is the first empirical study examining the effect of protests on reducing online prejudice. Our results show that there were both negative and positive changes in the measured prejudice after a protest, suggesting protest might have a mixed effect on reducing prejudice. We further identify users who are likely to change (or resist change) after a protest. This work contributes to the understanding of online prejudice and its intervention effect. The findings of this research have implications for designing targeted intervention.

References

  1. Gordon Willard Allport, Kenneth Clark, and Thomas Pettigrew. 1954. The nature of prejudice. (1954).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Edwin Amenta and Michael P Young. 1999. Democratic states and social movements: Theoretical arguments and hypotheses. Social problems 46, 2 (1999), 153–168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kenneth T Andrews, Kraig Beyerlein, and Tuneka Tucker Farnum. 2015. The legitimacy of protest: explaining White Southerners’ attitudes toward the civil rights movement. Social Forces 94, 3 (2015), 1021–1044.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. J Bacon and A Gomez. 2017. Protests against Trump’s immigration plan rolling in more than 30 cities. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2017/01/29/homeland-security-judges-stay-has-little-impact-travel-ban/97211720/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Lee Ann Banaszak and Heather L Ondercin. 2016. Public opinion as a movement outcome: The case of the US women’s movement. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 21, 3 (2016), 361–378.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Valerio Basile, Cristina Bosco, Elisabetta Fersini, Debora Nozza, Viviana Patti, Francisco Manuel Rangel Pardo, Paolo Rosso, and Manuela Sanguinetti. 2019. Semeval-2019 task 5: Multilingual detection of hate speech against immigrants and women in twitter. In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. 54–63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Anat Ben-David and Ariadna Matamoros-Fernández. 2016. Hate speech and covert discrimination on social media: Monitoring the Facebook pages of extreme-right political parties in Spain. International Journal of Communication 10 (2016), 1167–1193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. E Bermudez, R Vives, S Kohli, and M Etehad. 2017. Day Without Immigrants’ resonates across Los Angeles, even if many still go to work. http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-ln-day-without-immigrants-20170216-story.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Catherine Blaya. 2019. Cyberhate: A review and content analysis of intervention strategies. Aggression and violent behavior 45 (2019), 163–172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Denise M Bostdorff. 2004. The internet rhetoric of the Ku Klux Klan: A case study in web site community building run amok. Communication Studies 55, 2 (2004), 340–361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Michael P Boyle, Lauren Dioguardi, and Julie E Pate. 2016. A comparison of three strategies for reducing the public stigma associated with stuttering. Journal of fluency disorders 50 (2016), 44–58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Regina Branton, Valerie Martinez-Ebers, Tony E Carey Jr, and Tetsuya Matsubayashi. 2015. Social protest and policy attitudes: The case of the 2006 immigrant rallies. American Journal of Political Science 59, 2 (2015), 390–402.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Pete Burnap and Matthew L Williams. 2016. Us and them: identifying cyber hate on Twitter across multiple protected characteristics. EPJ Data Science 5, 1 (2016), 11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. CBS. 2017. Day Without Immigrants Boycott Having An Impact In North Texas. http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2017/02/16/day-without-immigrants-boycott-having-an-impact-in-north-texas/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jason Chan, Anindya Ghose, and Robert Seamans. 2016. The internet and racial hate crime: Offline spillovers from online access. MIS Quarterly 40, 2 (2016), 381–403.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Michael Chau and Jennifer Xu. 2007. Mining communities and their relationships in blogs: A study of online hate groups. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65, 1 (2007), 57–70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rubén Comas-Forgas, Jaume Sureda-Negre, and Aina Calvo-Sastre. 2017. Characteristics of Cyberbullying Among Native and Immigrant Secondary Education Students. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL) 7, 1(2017), 1–17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Patrick W Corrigan, Scott B Morris, Patrick J Michaels, Jennifer D Rafacz, and Nicolas Rüsch. 2012. Challenging the public stigma of mental illness: a meta-analysis of outcome studies. Psychiatric services 63, 10 (2012), 963–973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Patrick W Corrigan, David Roe, and Hector WH Tsang. 2011. Challenging the stigma of mental illness: Lessons for therapists and advocates. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. S Daniels and M Graham. 2017. Immigrants across the U.S. skip work, school in anti-Trump protest. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-immigration-protest/immigrants-across-the-u-s-skip-work-school-in-anti-trump-protest-idUSKBN15V19MGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Thomas Davidson, Dana Warmsley, Michael Macy, and Ingmar Weber. 2017. Automated hate speech detection and the problem of offensive language. In Eleventh international aaai conference on web and social media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. B Demick. 2017. Thousands at JFK airport in New York protest new visa and refugee suspensions. http://www.latimes.com/politics/washington/la-na-trailguide-updates-thousands-at-jfk-airport-in-new-york-1485642642-htmlstory.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Thomas E Ford, Sabrina R Teeter, Kyle Richardson, and Julie A Woodzicka. 2017. Putting the brakes on prejudice rebound effects: An ironic effect of disparagement humor. The Journal of social psychology 157, 4 (2017), 458–473.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. William A Gamson. 1989. Reflections onThe Strategy of Social Protest. In Sociological Forum, Vol. 4. Springer, 455–467.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Marco Giugni. 2004. Social protest and policy change: Ecology, antinuclear, and peace movements in comparative perspective. Rowman & Littlefield.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Shannon Greenwood, Andrew Perrin, and Maeve Duggan. 2016. Social media update 2016: Facebook usage and engagement is on the rise, while adoption of other platforms holds steady. Pew Research Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Xingsheng He, Di Lu, Drew Margolin, Mengdi Wang, Salma El Idrissi, and Yu-Ru Lin. 2017. The signals and noise: actionable information in improvised social media channels during a disaster. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference. ACM, 33–42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. B Horn. 2017. Thousands at Philly airport call Trump’s order ’un-American’. Delaware Online. https://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/local/2017/01/29/delaware-immigration-trump-protest/97215226/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Krishna Y Kamath, James Caverlee, Kyumin Lee, and Zhiyuan Cheng. 2013. Spatio-temporal dynamics of online memes: a study of geo-tagged tweets. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web. 667–678.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Jenny Kitzinger. 1995. Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. Bmj 311, 7000 (1995), 299–302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Irene Kwok and Yuzhou Wang. 2013. Locate the hate: Detecting tweets against blacks. In Twenty-seventh AAAI conference on artificial intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Yu-Ru Lin, Brian Keegan, Drew Margolin, and David Lazer. 2014. Rising tides or rising stars?: Dynamics of shared attention on Twitter during media events. PloS one 9, 5 (2014), e94093.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Yu-Ru Lin, Drew Margolin, and Xidao Wen. 2017. Tracking and analyzing individual distress following terrorist attacks using social media streams. Risk analysis 37, 8 (2017), 1580–1605.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Estefanía Lozano, Jorge Cedeño, Galo Castillo, Fabricio Layedra, Henry Lasso, and Carmen Vaca. 2017. Requiem for online harassers: Identifying racism from political tweets. In 2017 Fourth International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG). IEEE, 154–160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Jason Luty, Okon Umoh, Mohammed Sessay, and Arghya Sarkhel. 2007. Effectiveness of Changing Minds campaign factsheets in reducing stigmatised attitudes towards mental illness. Psychiatric Bulletin 31, 10 (2007), 377–381.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. C Neil Macrae, Galen V Bodenhausen, Alan B Milne, and Jolanda Jetten. 1994. Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound.Journal of personality and social psychology 67, 5(1994), 808.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Soumyajit Mazumder. 2018. The persistent effect of US civil rights protests on political attitudes. American Journal of Political Science 62, 4 (2018), 922–935.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. James McCorriston, David Jurgens, and Derek Ruths. 2015. Organizations are users too: Characterizing and detecting the presence of organizations on Twitter. In Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Lacy G McNamee, Brittany L Peterson, and Jorge Peña. 2010. A call to educate, participate, invoke and indict: Understanding the communication of online hate groups. Communication Monographs 77, 2 (2010), 257–280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Richard Jayadi Oentaryo, Jia-Wei Low, and Ee-Peng Lim. 2015. Chalk and cheese in twitter: Discriminating personal and organization accounts. In European Conference on Information Retrieval. Springer, 465–476.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Alexandra Olteanu, Carlos Castillo, Jeremy Boy, and Kush R Varshney. 2018. The effect of extremist violence on hatexfful speech online. In Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. James W Pennebaker, Ryan L Boyd, Kayla Jordan, and Kate Blackburn. 2015. The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC 2015. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Associated Press. 2017. More Than 3,000 Protest Trump Executive Order At Sea-Tac Airport. https://www.kiro7.com/news/local/anti-trump-protesters-gather-again-in-seattle/489087028Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. B. Quimby. 2017. Thousands protest Trump policies at 2 rallies in Portland.https://www.pressherald.com/2017/01/29/anti-trump-rallies-are-popping-up-around-maine-today/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. K Reece. 2017. Dallas workers join national ’Day Without Immigrants’ protest. http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/dallas-workers-to-take-part-in-day-without-immigrants/408856343Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. L Robbins and A Correal. 2017. On a ‘Day Without Immigrants,’ Workers Show Their Presence by Staying Home. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/16/nyregion/day-without-immigrants-boycott-trump-policy.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Jennifer D Rubin and Sara I McClelland. 2015. ‘Even though it’s a small checkbox, it’s a big deal’: stresses and strains of managing sexual identity (s) on Facebook. Culture, health & sexuality 17, 4 (2015), 512–526.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Maarten Sap, Dallas Card, Saadia Gabriel, Yejin Choi, and Noah A Smith. 2019. The Risk of Racial Bias in Hate Speech Detection. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 1668–1678.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Leandro Silva, Mainack Mondal, Denzil Correa, Fabrício Benevenuto, and Ingmar Weber. 2016. Analyzing the targets of hate in online social media. In Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Yanmin Sun, Andrew KC Wong, and Mohamed S Kamel. 2009. Classification of imbalanced data: A review. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 23, 04(2009), 687–719.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Imogen Tyler and Katarzyna Marciniak. 2013. Immigrant protest: an introduction. Citizenship studies 17, 2 (2013), 143–156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Onur Varol, Emilio Ferrara, Clayton A Davis, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2017. Online human-bot interactions: Detection, estimation, and characterization. In Eleventh international AAAI conference on web and social media.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Maykel Verkuyten and Borja Martinovic. 2015. Behind the ethnic–civic distinction: public attitudes towards immigrants’ political rights in the Netherlands. Social science research 53 (2015), 34–44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Daniel M Wegner, Ralph Erber, and Sophia Zanakos. 1993. Ironic processes in the mental control of mood and mood-related thought.Journal of personality and social psychology 65, 6(1993), 1093.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Daniel M Wegner and David J Schneider. 1989. Mental control: The war of the ghosts in the machine. Unintended thought (1989), 287–305.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Examining Protest as An Intervention to Reduce Online Prejudice: A Case Study of Prejudice Against Immigrants
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          WWW '20: Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020
          April 2020
          3143 pages
          ISBN:9781450370233
          DOI:10.1145/3366423

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 20 April 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

          Upcoming Conference

          WWW '24
          The ACM Web Conference 2024
          May 13 - 17, 2024
          Singapore , Singapore

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format