skip to main content
10.1145/3371049.3371062acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Animal-Centred Sonic Interaction Design: Musical Instruments and Interfaces for Grey Parrots

Published:10 January 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes our research and the methodology used to design musical instruments and interfaces aimed at providing auditory enrichment for grey parrots living in captivity. Based on the cognitive, physiological, and acoustic abilities of grey parrots, and their intrinsic interest in acoustic and physical interactions, we have developed and tested various interactive instrument prototypes from an animal-centered design perspective. In a previous study, we analyzed the physical and musical skills of a group of grey parrots, and here we present our design results for auditory enrichment in the context of Animal Computer Interaction (ACI) and artistic research. Our investigation should lead to a better understanding of how grey parrots interact with technological mediators, respond to sound devices, and create "parrot music," with potential benefits for their wellbeing while living in captivity.

References

  1. Clara Mancini. Animal Computer Interaction (ACI): a manifesto. Interactions, 18(4) pp. 69--73. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. French, Fiona & Gupfinger, Reinhard & Kendrick, Paul. (2018). SoundJam 2018: Acoustic Design for Auditory Enrichment. Fifth International Conference on Animal Computer Interaction, At Atlanta, Georgia, USAGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. French, F.; Mancini, C.; Sharp, H. High tech cognitive and acoustic enrichment for captive elephants. J. Neurosci. Methods 2018, 300, 173--183, doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.09.009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. French, F.; Mancini, C.; Sharp, H. Designing Interactive Toys for Elephants. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play---CHI PLAY'15, London, UK, 5-7 October 2015; ACM Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 523--528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Pons, P.; Carter, M.; Jaen, J. Sound to your objects: A novel design approach to evaluate orangutans' interest in sound-based stimuli. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Animal Computer Interaction, Milton Keynes, UK, 16-17 November 2016; doi:10.1145/2995257.2995383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mingle, M.E.; Eppley, T.M.; Campbell, M.W.; Hall, K.; Horner, V.; de Waal, F.B.M. Chimpanzees Prefer African and Indian Music over Silence. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Learn. Cognit. 2014, doi:10.1037/xan0000032.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Krohn, T.C.; Salling, B.; Hansen, A.K. How do rats respond to playing radio in the animal facility? Lab. Anim. 2011, doi:10.1258/la.2011.010067.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Robbins, L.; Margulis, S.W. The Effects of Auditory Enrichment on Gorillas. Zoo Biol. 2014, doi:10.1002/zoo.21127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Wells, D.H.; Irwin, R.M. Auditory stimulation as enrichment for zoo housed Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). Anim. Welf. 2008, 17, 335--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Hoeschele, M.; Merchant, H.; Kikuchi, Y.; Hattori, Y.; Cate, C. Searching for the origins of musicality across species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 370, doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0094.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Bottoni, L.; Massa, R.; Lenti Boero, D. The grey parrot as musician: An experiment with the Temperate Scale. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 2003, 15, 133--141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ten Cate, C.; Spierings, M.; Hubert, J.; Honing, H. Can birds perceive rhythmic patterns? A review and experiments on a songbird and a parrot species. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00730.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Patel, A.; Iversen, J.; Bregman, M.; Schulz, I. Experimental Evidence for Synchronization to a Musical Beat in a Nonhuman Animal. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, 827--830.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Schachner, A.; Brady, T.; Pepperberg, I.; Hauser, M. Spontaneous motor entrainment to music in multiple vocal mimicking species. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, 831--866.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Irene M. Pepperberg. Cognitive and communicative abilities of Grey parrots. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 100, 77--86, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Peron F, Hoummady S, Mauny N, Bovet D. 2012. Touch screen and music enrichments to captive housing conditions of African grey parrots. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, Vol 7, No 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Levine Bruce S. 2003. Common disorders of amazons, Australian Parakeets, and African Grey Parrots. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine 12, 125--130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Gupfinger, R.; Kaltenbrunner, M. Animals Make Music: A Look at Non-Human Musical Expression. Multimodal Technologies Interact. 2018, 2, 51. https//www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/2/3/51Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Jeon, M.; Winton, R.J.; Yim, J.-B.; Bruce, C.M.; Walker, B.N. AquariumFugue: Interactive sonification for children and visually impaired audience in informal learning environments. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2012), Atlanta, GA, USA, 18-21 June 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Cordeiro, J. FuXi: A Fish-Driven Instrument for Real-Time Music Performance. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference, EvoMUSART 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark, 8-10 April 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Vivian, C. Submersed Songs. Available online video: https//www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhTCf_3l1EgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Quiet Ensemble: Quintetto. Available online: http//www.quietensemble.com/quintetto.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Baldan, S.; Ludovico, L.; Mauro, D. Musica Sull'Acqua. In Proceedings of the 9th Sound and Music Computing Conference (SMC2012), Copenhagen, Denmark, 12-14 July 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Mercer-Taylor, A.; Altosaar, J. Sonification of Fish Movement Using Pitch Mesh Pairs. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME'15), Baton Rouge, LA, USA, 31 May--3 June 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Ken Rinaldos, Augmented Fish Reality online: http//www.kenrinaldo.com/portfolio/augmented-fish-reality/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Chase Ava, R. Music discrimination by carp. Anim. Learn. Behav. 2001, 29, 336--353.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Ladich, F. Acoustic Communication in Fishes: Sound Production, Hearing and the Effect of Noise. Master's Thesis, Verhaltensbiologie, Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Levy Marcel Ingles Lorenzo. Intelligent MIDI Sequencing with Hamster Control; Cornell University: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Boursier Mougenot, C. From Here to Ear. Available online: http://www.xippas.com/artists/celeste-boursier-mougenot/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Solder, D. Eine Kleine Naughtmusik: How Nefarious Nonartists Cleverly Imitate Music. Leonardo Music J. 2002, 12, 53--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Rothenberg, D. (2008). Whale Music: Anatomy of an Interspecies Duet. Leonardo Music Journal 18, 47--53. The MIT Press. Retrieved January 24, 2019, from Project MUSE database.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Gupfinger, Reinhard & Kaltenbrunner, Martin. (2017). Sonic Experiments with Grey Parrots: A Report on Testing the Auditory Skills and Musical Preferences of Grey Parrots in Captivity. 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152130.3152137Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Hirskyj-Douglas, I.; Pons, P.; Read, J. & Jaen, J. 2018. 'Seven Years after the Manifesto: Literature Review and Research Directions for Technologies in Animal Computer Interaction' MULTIMODAL TECHNOLOGIES AND INTERACTION, pp. 1--29. DOI: 10.3390/mti2020030Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Irene M. Pepperberg. Vocal learning in Grey parrots: A brief review of perception, production, and cross-species comparisons. Brain & Language 115, 81--91, 2010. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2009.11.00Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Animal-Centred Sonic Interaction Design: Musical Instruments and Interfaces for Grey Parrots

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ACI '19: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction
      November 2019
      172 pages
      ISBN:9781450376938
      DOI:10.1145/3371049

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 January 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader