Abhishek Goyal
ABSTRACT
This paper introduces a time domain approach based on Granger causality for estimating directional flow between multivariate time series. It is formulated under the framework of vector autoregressive model. Sparse regression is used to find the solution to the VAR model and validation of the results are carried out with the help of simulations. We also demonstrate the application of this method on actual EEG dataset.
- Luiz A Baccalá and Koichi Sameshima. 2001. Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biological cybernetics 84, 6 (2001), 463--474.Google Scholar
- Katarzyna J Blinowska. 2011. Review of the methods of determination of directed connectivity from multichannel data. Medical & biological engineering & computing 49, 5 (2011), 521--529.Google Scholar
- Clemens Brunner, Martin Billinger, Martin Seeber, Timothy R Mullen, and Scott Makeig. 2016. Volume conduction influences scalp-based connectivity estimates. Frontiers in computational neuroscience 10 (2016), 121.Google Scholar
- Guillermo A Cecchi, Rahul Garg, and A Ravishankar Rao. 2008. Inferring brain dynamics using Granger causality on fMRI data. In 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro. IEEE, Paris, France, 604--607.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joyce Chiang, Z Jane Wang, and Martin J McKeown. 2009. Sparse multivariate autoregressive (MAR)-based partial directed coherence (PDC) for electroencephalogram (EEG) analysis. In 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. IEEE, Taipei, Taiwan, 457--460.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richard A Davis, Pengfei Zang, and Tian Zheng. 2016. Sparse vector autoregressive modeling. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 25, 4 (2016), 1077--1096.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bradley Efron, Trevor Hastie, Iain Johnstone, Robert Tibshirani, et al. 2004. Least angle regression. The Annals of statistics 32, 2 (2004), 407--499.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John Geweke. 1982. Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. Journal of the American statistical association 77, 378 (1982), 304--313.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rainer Goebel, Alard Roebroeck, Dae-Shik Kim, and Elia Formisano. 2003. Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. Magnetic resonance imaging 21, 10 (2003), 1251--1261.Google Scholar
- Clive WJ Granger. 1969. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 37 (1969), 424--438.Google ScholarCross Ref
- James Douglas Hamilton. 1994. Time series analysis. Vol. 2. Princeton university press Princeton, NJ, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
- Stefan Haufe, Klaus-Robert Müller, Guido Nolte, and Nicole Krämer. 2008. Sparse Causal Discovery in Multivariate Time Series. In Proceedings of the 2008th International Conference on Causality: Objectives and Assessment - Volume 6 (COA'08). JMLR.org, Whistler, Canada, 97--106. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2996801.2996808Google Scholar
- Nan-Jung Hsu, Hung-Lin Hung, and Ya-Mei Chang. 2008. Subset selection for vector autoregressive processes using lasso. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 52, 7 (2008), 3645--3657.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kevin Judd and Alistair Mees. 1998. Embedding as a modeling problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 120, 3-4 (1998), 273--286.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maciej Kaminski and Katarzyna J Blinowska. 2017. The influence of volume conduction on DTF estimate and the problem of its mitigation. Frontiers in computational neuroscience 11 (2017), 36.Google Scholar
- Maciej Kamiński, Mingzhou Ding, Wilson A Truccolo, and Steven L Bressler. 2001. Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance. Biological cybernetics 85, 2 (2001), 145--157.Google Scholar
- Marcin Jan Kaminski and Katarzyna J Blinowska. 1991. A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures. Biological cybernetics 65, 3 (1991), 203--210.Google Scholar
- Anna Korzeniewska, Małgorzata Mańczak, Maciej Kamiński, Katarzyna J Blinowska, and Stefan Kasicki. 2003. Determination of information flow direction among brain structures by a modified directed transfer function (dDTF) method. Journal of neuroscience methods 125, 1-2 (2003), 195--207.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rolf Kötter and Klaas E Stephan. 2003. Network participation indices: characterizing component roles for information processing in neural networks. Neural Networks 16, 9 (2003), 1261--1275.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rafal Kus, Maciej Kaminski, and Katarzyna J Blinowska. 2004. Determination of EEG activity propagation: pair-wise versus multichannel estimate. IEEE transactions on Biomedical Engineering 51, 9 (2004), 1501--1510.Google Scholar
- Yang Li, Chong-Yaw Wee, Biao Jie, Ziwen Peng, and Dinggang Shen. 2014. Sparse multivariate autoregressive modeling for mild cognitive impairment classification. Neuroinformatics 12, 3 (2014), 455--469.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paul L Nunez, Ramesh Srinivasan, et al. 2006. Electric fields of the brain: the neurophysics of EEG. Oxford University Press, USA, Oxford, England, UK.Google Scholar
- Ali Shojaie and George Michailidis. 2010. Discovering graphical Granger causality using the truncating lasso penalty. Bioinformatics 26, 18 (2010), i517--i523.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joan G Snodgrass and Mary Vanderwart. 1980. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of experimental psychology: Human learning and memory 6, 2 (1980), 174.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Song Song, Wolfgang K Härdle, and Ya'acov Ritov. 2014. Generalized dynamic semi-parametric factor models for high-dimensional non-stationary time series. The Econometrics Journal 17, 2 (2014), S101--S131.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Olaf Sporns, Giulio Tononi, and Gerald M Edelman. 2000. Theoretical neuroanatomy: relating anatomical and functional connectivity in graphs and cortical connection matrices. Cerebral cortex 10, 2 (2000), 127--141.Google Scholar
- Olaf Sporns and Jonathan D Zwi. 2004. The small world of the cerebral cortex. Neuroinformatics 2, 2 (2004), 145--162.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Toshihiro Tanizawa, Tomomichi Nakamura, Fumihiko Taya, and Michael Small. 2018. Constructing directed networks from multivariate time series using linear modelling technique. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 512 (2018), 437--455.Google Scholar
- Pedro A Valdés-Sosa, Jose M Sánchez-Bornot, Agustín Lage-Castellanos, Mayrim Vega-Hernández, Jorge Bosch-Bayard, Lester Melie-García, and Erick Canales-Rodríguez. 2005. Estimating brain functional connectivity with sparse multivariate autoregression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360, 1457 (2005), 969--981.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pedro A Valdés-Sosa, Jose M Sánchez-Bornot, Agustín Lage-Castellanos, Mayrim Vega-Hernández, Jorge Bosch-Bayard, Lester Melie-García, and Erick Canales-Rodríguez. 2005. Estimating brain functional connectivity with sparse multivariate autoregression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360, 1457 (2005), 969--981.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Frederik Van de Steen, Luca Faes, Esin Karahan, Jitkomut Songsiri, Pedro A Valdes-Sosa, and Daniele Marinazzo. 2016. Critical comments on EEG sensor space dynamical connectivity analysis. Brain topography 32 (2016), 1--12.Google Scholar
- Hansheng Wang, Guodong Li, and Chih-Ling Tsai. 2007. Regression coefficient and autoregressive order shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 69, 1 (2007), 63--78.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Xiao Lei Zhang, Henri Begleiter, Bernice Porjesz, Wenyu Wang, and Ann Litke. 1995. Event related potentials during object recognition tasks. Brain Research Bulletin 38, 6 (1995), 531--538.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Effective EEG Connectivity by Sparse Vector Autoregressive Model
Recommendations
Causal Connectivity Brain Network: A Novel Method of Motor Imagery Classification for Brain-Computer Interface Applications
CMCSN '12: Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Computing, Measurement, Control and Sensor NetworkThe effective connectivity among overlapped core regions recruited by motor imagery (MI) was explored by means of Granger causality and graph-theoretic method, based on Electroencephalography (EEG) data. In this paper, causal connectivity brain network (...
A self-organized recurrent neural network for estimating the effective connectivity and its application to EEG data
Abstract ObjectiveEffective connectivity is an important notion in neuroscience research, useful for detecting the interactions between regions of the brain.
New methodSince we are dealing with a ...
Highlights- Effective connectivity is estimated using RNN-NGUEW-GC method.
- RNN-NGUEW-GC is ...
Detecting effective connectivity in networks of coupled neuronal oscillators
The application of data-driven time series analysis techniques such as Granger causality, partial directed coherence and phase dynamics modeling to estimate effective connectivity in brain networks has recently gained significant prominence in the ...
Comments