skip to main content
10.1145/3372938.3372989acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbdiotConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Investigation of Energy Efficient Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks on Variant Energy Models

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 January 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Practically, WSNs have multiple problems like communication, data processing, and sensor node management due to ambiguous and dynamic environments. In addition, WSNs have more challenging issues such as network routing protocols, sensor node assessment strategies, energy efficiency, and energy models. There is a need to develop new protocols that can provide efficient network management and extend the network lifetime. The concept of WSNs looks practical and exciting on paper, but the power consumption by an individual node is the main constraint of node performance. Various strategies that can be implemented to reduce the power consumption include (i) reduction in data transmission through data compression, (ii) lower the frequency and duty cycle of the data transmission, (iii) reduce the size of the frame overhead, (iv) efficient power management mechanisms, (v) scheduling an eventdriven transmission strategy, and (vi) develop energy efficient routing protocols. There are many authors that have considered the term energy efficiency from different viewpoints, but there are additional issues such as energy models, terrain conditions, mobility, scalability, and so on that still need more consideration to become more and more energy efficient. The foremost goal of this research is to evaluate and enhance the existing WSN frameworks.

References

  1. [n.d.]. MIT Technology Review. Feb 2003. 10 Emerging Technologies That Will Change the World,. ([n. d.]).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Hania Aoudia, Youcef Touati, and Arab Ali-Cherif. 2013. Energy-efficient Routing Protocol Based on Dynamicclustering Mechanism for WSN Applications. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Symposium on Mobility Management and Wireless Access (MobiWac '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 89--92. https://doi.org/10.1145/2508222.2508238Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jingwen Bai, Mingming Fan, Jinze Yang, Yan Sun, and Chris Phillips. 2015. Smart Energy Harvesting Routing Protocol for WSN Based E-Health Systems. In Proceedings of the 2015 Workshop on Pervasive Wireless Healthcare (MobileHealth '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 23--28. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757290.2757296Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Mohammad Baniata, Mhanwoo Heo, Jinwoo Lee, Juw Won Park, and Jiman Hong. 2018. Energy-efficient Unequal Chain Length Clustering for WSN. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2125--2131. https://doi.org/10.1145/3167132.3167361Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Md Zakirul Alam Bhuiyan, Jie Wu, Guojun Wang, Tian Wang, and Mohammad Mehedi Hassan. 2017. e-Sampling: Event-Sensitive Autonomous Adaptive Sensing and Low-Cost Monitoring in Networked Sensing Systems. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. 12, 1, Article 1 (March 2017), 29 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2994150Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Suman Sankar Bhunia, Bijoy Das, and Nandini Mukherjee. 2015. Multi Criteria Decision Analysis Assisted Routing in Wireless Sensor Network Using Fuzzy Rules. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking (ICDCN '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 32, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2684464.2684499Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Brusey, J. Kemp, E. Gaura, R. Wilkins, and M. Allen. 2016. Energy Profiling in Practical Sensor Networks: Identifying Hidden Consumers. IEEE Sensors Journal 16, 15 (Aug 2016), 6072--6080. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2016.2570420Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Chee-Yee Chong and S.P. Kumar. 2003. Sensor networks: evolution, opportunities, and challenges. Proc. IEEE 91, 8 (Aug. 2003), 1247--1256. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2003.814918Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. H. Cotuk, K. Bicakci, B. Tavli, and E. Uzun. 2014. The Impact of Transmission Power Control Strategies on Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Trans. Comput. 63, 11 (Nov 2014), 2866--2879. https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2013.151Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Mohamed A. Eshaftri, Ahmed Y. Al-Dubai, Imed Romdhani, and Alsnousi Essa. 2016. Weight Driven Cluster Head Rotation for Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multi Media (MoMM '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 327--331. https://doi.org/10.1145/3007120.3007170Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Mohamed A. Eshaftri, Ahmed Y. Al-Dubai, Imed Romdhani, and Muneer Bani Yassien. 2015. An Efficient Dynamic Load-balancing Aware Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia (MoMM 2015). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 189--194. https://doi.org/10.1145/2837126.2837149Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Laura Marie Feeney and Martin Nilsson. 2001. Investigating the energy consumption of a wireless network interface in an ad hoc networking environment. In Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No. 01CH37213), Vol. 3. IEEE, 1548--1557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. V. Jain, Gerard Parr, David Bustard, and Philip Morrow. 2010. Deriving a generic energy consumption model for network enabled devices. (01 2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/NCC.2010.5430165Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S.K. Jayaweera. 2004. An energy-efficient virtual MIMO architecture based on V-BLAST processing for distributed wireless sensor networks. 299 -- 308. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAHCN.2004.1381930Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. David B. Johnson, David A. Maltz, and Josh Broch. 2001. Ad Hoc Networking. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA, Chapter DSR: The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Multihop Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, 139--172. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=374547.374552Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J.M. Kahn, R. H. Katz, and K. S. J. Pister. 1999. Next Century Challenges: Mobile Networking for "Smart Dust". In Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (Mobi-Com '99). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 271--278. https://doi.org/10.1145/313451.313558Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Gordon E. Moore. 1965. Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 38, 8 (April 1965).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. H. Park, J. Friedman, M. B. Srivastava, and J. Burke. 2005. A new light sensing module for Mica motes. In SENSORS, 2005 IEEE. 4 pp.--. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2005.1597748Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Selvi, R. Logambigai, S. Ganapathy, L. Sai Ramesh, H. Khanna Nehemiah, and Kannan Arputharaj. 2016. Fuzzy Temporal Approach for Energy Efficient Routing in WSN. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Informatics and Analytics (ICIA-16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 117, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2980258.2982109Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Syed Bilal Hussain Shah, Chen Zhe, Syed Hassan Ahmed, Yin Fuliang, Muhammad Faheem, and Seema Begum. 2018. Depth Based Routing Protocol Using Smart Clustered Sensor Nodes in Underwater WSN. In Proceedings of the 2Nd International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems (ICFNDS '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 53, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3231053.3231119Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Victor Shnayder, Mark Hempstead, Bor rong Chen, Geoffrey Werner-Allen, and Matt Welsh. 2004. Simulating the power consumption of large-scale sensor network applications. In SenSys.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Olivier Tremblay, Louis-A Dessaint, and A.-I Dekkiche. 2007. A Generic Battery Model for the Dynamic Simulation of Hybrid Electric Vehicles. VPPC 2007 -Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, 284 -- 289. https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC.2007.4544139Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Tijs van Dam and Koen Langendoen. 2003. An Adaptive Energy-efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 171--180. https://doi.org/10.1145/958491.958512Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ting Zhu, Ziguo Zhong, Tian He, and Zhi-Li Zhang. 2013. Achieving Efficient Flooding by Utilizing Link Correlation in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 21, 1 (Feb. 2013), 121--134. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2012.2197689Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Investigation of Energy Efficient Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks on Variant Energy Models

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            BDIoT '19: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Big Data and Internet of Things
            October 2019
            476 pages
            ISBN:9781450372404
            DOI:10.1145/3372938

            Copyright © 2019 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 7 January 2020

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            BDIoT '19 Paper Acceptance Rate75of136submissions,55%Overall Acceptance Rate75of136submissions,55%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader