skip to main content
10.1145/3377816.3381728acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Synthesis of assurance cases for software certification

Published:18 September 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

As software is rapidly being embedded into major parts of our society, ranging from medical devices and self-driving vehicles to critical infrastructures, potential risks of software failures are also growing at an alarming pace. Existing certification processes, however, suffer from a lack of rigor and automation, and often incur a significant amount of manual effort on both system developers and certifiers. To address this issue, we propose a substantially automated, cost-effective certification method, backed with a novel analysis synthesis technique to automatically generate application-specific analysis tools that are custom-tailored to producing the necessary evidence. The outcome of this research promises to not only assist software developers in producing safer and more reliable software, but also benefit industrial certification agencies by significantly reducing the manual effort of certifiers. Early validation flows from experience applying this approach in constructing an assurance case for a surgical robot system in collaboration with the Center for the Advanced Surgical Technology.

References

  1. The Center for Advanced Surgical Technology. https://www.unmc.edu/cast/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. D. Alrajeh, J. Kramer, A. Russo, and S. Uchitel. Learning operational requirements from goal models. In ICSE, pages 265--275, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. T. Carlson and E. Van Wyk. Type Qualifiers As Composable Language Extensions. In Proceedings of GPCE, pages 91--103, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. David, P. Kesseli, D. Kroening, and M. Lewis. Program Synthesis for Program Analysis. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst., 40(2):5:1--5:45, May 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. W. Dietl, S. Dietzel, M. D. Ernst, K. Muşlu, and T. W. Schiller. Building and Using Pluggable Type-checkers. In Proceedings of ICSE, pages 681--690, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. S. Foster, M. Fähndrich, and A. Aiken. A theory of type qualifiers. In PLDI, pages 192--203, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Giannakopoulou, C. S. Pasareanu, and H. Barringer. Assumption generation for software component verification. In ASE, pages 3--12, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C. S. Gordon. Synthesizing program-specific static analyses. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.06600, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. I. Incer, A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, C.-W. Lin., and E. Kang. Quotient for Assume-Guarantee Contracts. In Proceedings of MEMOCODE, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. D. Jackson. Software Abstractions: Logic, language, and analysis. MIT Press, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. Jackson. Software for Dependable Systems: Sufficient Evidence? National Academies Press, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. T. Kelly and R. Weaver. The goal structuring notation-a safety argument notation. In Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN) Workshop on Assurance Cases, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. É. Leverett, R. Clayton, and R. Anderson. Standardisation and certification of the internet of things. In Proceedings of WEIS, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. N. Mansoor, J. A. Saddler, B. Silva, H. Bagheri, M. B. Cohen, and S. Farritor. Modeling and testing a family of surgical robots: an experience report. In Proceedings of ESEC/FSE, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. P. Near, A. Milicevic, E. Kang, and D. Jackson. A lightweight code analysis and its role in evaluation of a dependability case. In ICSE, pages 31--40. ACM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Pernsteiner, C. Loncaric, E. Torlak, Z. Tatlock, X. Wang, M. D. Ernst, and J. Jacky. Investigating safety of a radiotherapy machine using system models with pluggable checkers. In Proceedings of CAV, pages 23--41, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). List of Device Recalls. https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/safety/listofrecalls. Accessed: 2018-11-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). General principles of software validation; final guidance for industry and fda staff. httpsr://www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/.../ucm085371.pdf, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. J. Xiang, J. C. Knight, and K. J. Sullivan. Real-world types and their application. In Proceedings of SAFECOMP, pages 471--484, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Synthesis of assurance cases for software certification

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICSE-NIER '20: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Results
      June 2020
      128 pages
      ISBN:9781450371261
      DOI:10.1145/3377816

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 September 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Upcoming Conference

      ICSE 2025

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader