skip to main content
10.1145/3382025.3414948acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessplcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Third International Workshop on Languages for Modelling Variability (MODEVAR@SPLC 2020)

Published:19 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Feature models were invented in 1990 and have been recognised as one of the main contributions to the Software Product Line community. Although there have been several attempts to establish a sort of standard variability modelling language, there is still no consensus on a simple feature modelling language. There can be many motivations to have one but among others, there is one that is very important: information sharing among researchers, tools or developers. Following the spirit of the first two editions, this workshop is an interactive event where all participants shall share knowledge, but also first realizations about how to build up a simple feature modelling language that all the community can agree on.

References

  1. Mathieu Acher, Philippe Collet, Philippe Lahire, and Robert B France. 2013. Familiar: A domain-specific language for large scale management of feature models. Science of Computer Programming 78, 6 (2013), 657--681.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Rabih Bashroush, Muhammad Garba, Rick Rabiser, Iris Groher, and Goetz Botterweck. 2017. Case tool support for variability management in software product lines. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 50, 1 (2017), 14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. David Benavides, Pablo Trinidad, Antonio Ruiz-Cortés, and Sergio Segura. 2013. Fama. In Systems and software variability management. Springer, 163--171.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Øystein Haugen, Andrzej Wąsowski, and Krzysztof Czarnecki. 2013. CVL: common variability language. In 17th Int'l Software Product Line Conf. ACM, 277--277.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Paulius Juodisius, Atrisha Sarkar, Raghava Rao Mukkamala, Michal Antkiewicz, Krzysztof Czarnecki, and Andrzej Wasowski. 2019. Clafer: Lightweight Modeling of Structure, Behaviour, and Variability. Programming Journal 3, 1 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kyo C Kang, Sholom G Cohen, James A Hess, William E Novak, and A Spencer Peterson. 1990. Feature-oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study. Technical Report. SEI, Carnegie-Mellon Univ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jens Meinicke, Thomas Thüm, Reimar Schröter, Fabian Benduhn, Thomas Leich, and Gunter Saake. 2017. Mastering Software Variability with FeatureIDE. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Pierre-Yves Schobbens, Patrick Heymans, Jean-Christophe Trigaux, and Yves Bontemps. 2007. Generic semantics of feature diagrams. Computer Networks 51, 2 (2007), 456--479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Third International Workshop on Languages for Modelling Variability (MODEVAR@SPLC 2020)

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SPLC '20: Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Systems and Software Product Line: Volume A - Volume A
      October 2020
      323 pages
      ISBN:9781450375696
      DOI:10.1145/3382025

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 October 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      SPLC '20 Paper Acceptance Rate17of49submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate167of463submissions,36%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader