skip to main content
10.1145/3383583.3398596acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Spatial Research Leadership Flows and Spatial Research Leadership Rank: A Case Study of Pharmaceutical Field

Published:01 August 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Research collaborations especially long-distance collaborations are increasingly prevalent all over the world. Research leadership plays a key role in research collaborations. However, the collaboration relationship is homogeneously assigned to all authors in the same article, ignoring the dominance/leadership of the collaboration. Furthermore, in many cases, when evaluating research actors' performance, spatial features, which are found to be important to academic influence, are ignored. This paper aims to fill the gap by constructing a weighted and directed spatial research leadership network and propose SRLRank based on the network. Systemic analysis of spatial distribution and dynamic pattern of research leadership flows are performed. Thorough evaluations are conducted with comparisons to a set of traditional indices. The results indicate the superb performance of the proposed SRLRank. Finally, comprehensive implications and further applications of the SRLRank are discussed.

References

  1. Patricia S. Abril and Robert Plant, 2007. The patent holder's dilemma: Buy, Boschma, R. A. (2005). "Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment." Regional Studies 39(1): 61--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaocheng, H., W. Jiang and Z. Qingpeng (2019). Research Leadership Flow Determinants and the Role of Proximity in Research Collaborations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (Early access, DOI: 10.1002/asi.24331)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Gui, Q. C., C. L. Liu and D. B. Du (2018). "International Knowledge Flows and the Role of Proximity." Growth and Change 49(3): 532--547.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). "An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output." Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences 102(46): 16569--16572.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Hoekman, J., K. Frenken and R. J. W. Tijssen (2010). "Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe." Research Policy 39(5): 662--673.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Liu, X., J. Bollen, M. L. Nelson and H. Van de Sompel (2005). "Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community." Information processing & management 41(6): 1462--1480.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Lu, L. Y., D. B. Chen, X. L. Ren, Q. M. Zhang, Y. C. Zhang and T. Zhou (2016). "Vital nodes identification in complex networks." Physics Reports-Review Section of Physics Letters 650: 1--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Lu, L. Y., Y. C. Zhang, C. H. Yeung and T. Zhou (2011). "Leaders in Social Networks, the Delicious Case." Plos One 6(6): 9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Luo, Q., J. C. Xia, G. Haddow, M. Willson and J. Yang (2018). "Does distance hinder the collaboration between Australian universities in the humanities, arts and social sciences?" Scientometrics 115(2): 695--715.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Plotnikova, T. and B. Rake (2014). "Collaboration in pharmaceutical research: exploration of country-level determinants." Scientometrics 98(2): 1173--1202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Wang, W., Y. Wu and Y. Pan (2014). "An investigation of collaborations between top Chinese universities: a new quantitative approach." Scientometrics 98(2): 1535--1545.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Spatial Research Leadership Flows and Spatial Research Leadership Rank: A Case Study of Pharmaceutical Field

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        JCDL '20: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020
        August 2020
        611 pages
        ISBN:9781450375856
        DOI:10.1145/3383583

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 August 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader