skip to main content
10.1145/3384772.3385155acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Participatory construction of futures for the defense of human rights

Published:18 June 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Participatory design allows for designing speculative futures through a collaborative approach. This paper explores how a human rights defense non-governmental organization (NGO) and a group of designers could explore speculative futures collaboratively. It also reflects on how prototypes of these futures help the organization face potential changes in the country's social model to make an impact on the defense of human rights during the next ten years. This case study presents how the use of participatory design and speculative design can allow NGOs to explore the futures, identify the opportunities and challenges they offer, and co-design a roadmap to act accordingly.

References

  1. República de Colombia, «Constitución Política de la República de Colombia - 1886,» 1886. [En línea]. Available: https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10784/1083/LIBRO_342.861C718C86_1886.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. República de Colombia, «Constitución Política de la República de Colombia - 1991,» 1991. [En línea]. Available: http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/constitucion_politica_1991.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Corte Constitucional de la República de Colombia, «Sentencia SU214/16 - Matrimonio igualitario en Colombia,» [En línea]. Available: https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2016/SU214-16.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Corte Constitucional de la República de Colombia, «Sentencia C-683 de 2015- Adopción Igualitaria,» [En línea]. Available: https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2015/c-683-15.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Corte Constitucional de la República de Colombia, «Sentencia C-029 de 2009 – Modificación de artí¬culos de ramas del sistema jurí¬dico colombiano para incluir a parejas del mismo sexo,» [En línea]. Available: https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2009/c-029-09.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Corte Constitucional de la República de Colombia, «Sentencia C-1043 de 2006 – Modificación de artículo que regula los beneficiarios de la pensión de sobreviviente,» [En línea]. Available: https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2006/c-1043-06.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Defensoría del Pueblo de Colombia, «Directorio de Organizaciones Sociales,» 2017. [En línea]. Available: http://www.defensoria.gov.co/public/rendiciondecuentas/assets/directorio-organizaciones-sociales2017.pdf .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Colombia Diversa, «Acerca de,» 2019. [En línea]. Available: https://colombiadiversa.org/acerca-de-colombia-diversa/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. S. Candy y J. Dunagan, «Designing an experimental scenario: The people who vanished,» Futures, the Journal of Policy, Planning and Future Studies, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Dunne y F. Raby, Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. R. Mejía, G. Pasman, E. Hultink y P. Stappers, «Developing DIVE, a design-led futures technique for SMEs,» Proceedings of the International Conference on Product Development Management, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. P. Hekkert y M. Van Dijk, ViP vision in design: A guidebook for innovators, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Bis B.V., Uitgeverij (BIS Publishers), 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. E. Sanders y P. Stappers, «Probes, toolkits and prototypes: Three approaches to making in codesingning,» CoDesign, vol. 10, nº 1, pp. 5-14, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R. Mejía, G. Pasman y P. Stappers, «Vision concepts within the landscape of design research,» Proceedings of DRS2016: Design + Research + Society - Future-Focused Thinking, vol. 4, pp. 1659-1676, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. N. Henchley, «Making sense of future studies,» Alternatives, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. N. Salkind, Encyclopedia of research design, London: SAGE Publications, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M. a. C. M. Van der Velden, «Participatory Design and Design for Values,» de Handbook of Etics, Values, and Technological Design: Sources, Theory, Values and Application Domains, Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, 2015, pp. p.41-66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Schneider y A. Lawrence, This Is Service Design Doing: Applying Service Design Thinking in the Real World, New York, NY: O'Rilley, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. C. T. B. I. W. e. a. Mörtberg, «Methods That Matter in Digital Design Research,» de Exploring Digital Design: Multi-Disciplinary Design Practices, London, Springer London, 2010, pp. p. 105-144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. R. Mejía, Vision Concepts for Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Developing a Design-Led Futures Technique to Boost Innovation, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. R. Mejía y J. Parra, «Strategic PES: Product-experiences-services, a visual tool to support SMEs through service-dominant logic,» Touchpoint, The Journal of Service Design, vol. 6, nº 3, pp. 80-85, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. D. Lockton y S. Candy, «A Vocabulary for Visions in Designing for Transitions,» Proceedings of DRS2018 - University of Limerick, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. J. Lindley y P. Coulton, «Design Fiction: Anticipating Adoption,» IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 16, nº 1, pp. 43-47, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. B. Hanington y B. Martin, Universal Methods of Design, Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. S. Candy, The Futures of Everyday Life: Politics and the Design of Experimental Scenarios, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PDC '20: Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 2
    June 2020
    212 pages

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 18 June 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format