Thomas Gabor
ABSTRACT
We discuss the synergetic connection between quantum computing and artificial intelligence. After surveying current approaches to quantum artificial intelligence and relating them to a formal model for machine learning processes, we deduce four major challenges for the future of quantum artificial intelligence: (i) Replace iterative training with faster quantum algorithms, (ii) distill the experience of larger amounts of data into the training process, (iii) allow quantum and classical components to be easily combined and exchanged, and (iv) build tools to thoroughly analyze whether observed benefits really stem from quantum properties of the algorithm.
- [n. d.]. HHL implementation. https://github.com/Qiskit/qiskit-iqx-tutorials/blob/master/qiskit/advanced/aqua/linear_systems_of_equations.ipynb.Google Scholar
- [n. d.]. QAOA implementation. https://pennylane.ai/qml/app/tutorial_qaoa_maxcut.html.Google Scholar
- [n. d.]. QGAN Pennylane implementation. https://pennylane.ai/qml/app/tutorial_QGAN.html.Google Scholar
- [n. d.]. QGAN Qiskit implementation. https://github.com/Qiskit/qiskit-iqx-tutorials/blob/master/qiskit/advanced/aqua/artificial_intelligence/qgans_for_loading_random_distributions.ipynb.Google Scholar
- [n. d.]. SVM implementation. https://github.com/Qiskit/qiskit-iqx-tutorials/blob/master/qiskit/advanced/aqua/artificial_intelligence/qsvm_classification.ipynb.Google Scholar
- Esma Aïmeur, Gilles Brassard, and Sébastien Gambs. 2007. Quantum clustering algorithms. Proceedings of the 24th int'l conference on machine learning (2007).Google ScholarDigital Library
- DJ Albers, JC Sprott, and WD Dechert. 1996. Dynamical behavior of artificial neural networks with random weights. Intelligent Engineering Systems Through Artificial Neural Networks 6 (1996), 17--22.Google Scholar
- Md Zahangir Alom, Tarek M Taha, Chris Yakopcic, Stefan Westberg, Paheding Sidike, Mst Shamima Nasrin, Mahmudul Hasan, Brian C Van Essen, Abdul AS Awwal, and Vijayan K Asari. 2019. A state-of-the-art survey on deep learning theory and architectures. Electronics 8, 3 (2019), 292.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mohammad H Amin, Evgeny Andriyash, Jason Rolfe, Bohdan Kulchytskyy, and Roger Melko. 2018. Quantum boltzmann machine. arXiv:1601.02036 (2018).Google Scholar
- Dario Amodei and Danny Hernandez. 2018. AI and Compute. https://openai.com/blog/ai-and-compute/.Google Scholar
- Dario Amodei, Chris Olah, Jacob Steinhardt, Paul Christiano, John Schulman, and Dan Mané. 2016. Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv:1606.06565 (2016).Google Scholar
- Frank Arute, Kunal Arya, Ryan Babbush, Dave Bacon, Joseph C Bardin, Rami Barends, Rupak Biswas, Sergio Boixo, Fernando GSL Brandao, David A Buell, et al. 2019. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 7779 (2019), 505--510.Google Scholar
- Lenz Belzner, Michael Till Beck, Thomas Gabor, Harald Roelle, and Horst Sauer. 2016. Software engineering for distributed autonomous real-time systems. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Software Engineering for Smart Cyber-Physical Systems. ACM, 54--57.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tomas Bures, DannyWeyns, Bradley Schmer, Eduardo Tovar, Eric Boden, Thomas Gabor, Ilias Gerostathopoulos, Pragya Gupta, Eunsuk Kang, Alessia Knauss, et al. 2017. Software Engineering for Smart Cyber-Physical Systems: Challenges and Promising Solutions. ACM SIGSOFT Software Eng. Notes 42, 2 (2017), 19--24.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Radu Calinescu, Carlo Ghezzi, Marta Kwiatkowska, and Raffaela Mirandola. 2012. Self-adaptive software needs quantitative verification at runtime. Commun. ACM 55, 9 (2012), 69--77.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Giuseppe Cuccu, Julian Togelius, and Philippe Cudré-Mauroux. 2019. Playing atari with six neurons. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 998--1006.Google Scholar
- Pierre-Luc Dallaire-Demers and Nathan Killoran. 2018. Quantum generative adversarial networks. arXiv:1804.08641v2 (2018).Google Scholar
- Daoyi Dong, Chunlin Chen, Hanxiong Li, and Tzyh-Jong Tarn. 2008. Quantum reinforcement learning. arXiv:0810.3828 (2008).Google Scholar
- Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, and Sam Gutmann. 2014. A quantum approximate optimization algorithm. arXiv:1411.4028 (2014).Google Scholar
- Thomas Fösel, Petru Tighineanu, Talitha Weiss, and Florian Marquardt. 2018. Reinforcement learning with neural networks for quantum feedback. Physical Review X 8, 3 (2018), 031084.Google Scholar
- Thomas Gabor, Marie Kiermeier, Andreas Sedlmeier, Bernhard Kempter, Cornel Klein, Horst Sauer, Reiner Schmid, and Jan Wieghardt. 2018. Adapting quality assurance to adaptive systems: the scenario coevolution paradigm. In International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods. Springer, 137--154.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thomas Gabor, Andreas Sedlmeier, Thomy Phan, Fabian Ritz, Marie Kiermeier, Lenz Belzner, Bernhard Kempter, Cornel Klein, Horst Sauer, Reiner Schmid, Jan Wieghardt, Marc Zeller, and Claudia Linnhoff-Popien. 2020. The Scenario Co-Evolution Paradigm: Adaptive Quality Assurance for Adaptive Systems. International Journal on Software Tools and Technology Transfer (2020).Google Scholar
- Fred Glover, Gary Kochenberger, and Yu Du. 2018. A tutorial on formulating and using qubo models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.11538 (2018).Google Scholar
- Aram W Harrow, Avinatan Hassidim, and Seth Lloyd. 2009. Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations. arXiv:0811.317v3 (2009).Google Scholar
- Vojtěch Havlicek, Antonio D Córcoles, Kristan Temme, Aram W Harrow, Abhinav Kandala, Jerry M Chow, and Jay M Gambetta. 2018. Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces. arXiv:1804.11326v2 (2018).Google Scholar
- Matthias Hölzl, Nora Koch, Mariachiara Puviani, Martin Wirsing, and Franco Zambonelli. 2015. The ensemble development life cycle and best practices for collective autonomic systems. In Software Engineering for Collective Autonomic Systems. Springer, 325--354.Google Scholar
- Tadashi Kadowaki and Hidetoshi Nishimori. 1998. Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model. Physical Review E 58, 5 (1998), 5355.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Iordanis Kerenidis and Anupam Prakash. 2016. Quantum recommendation systems. arXiv:1603.08675v3 (2016).Google Scholar
- Amir Khoshaman, Walter Vinci, Brandon Denis, Evgeny Andriyash, Hossein Sadeghi, and Mohammad H Amin. 2018. Quantum variational autoencoder. arXiv:1802.05779v2 (2018).Google Scholar
- James King, Masoud Mohseni, William Bernoudy, Alexandre Fréchette, Hossein Sadeghi, Sergei V Isakov, Hartmut Neven, and Mohammad H Amin. 2019. Quantum-Assisted Genetic Algorithm. arXiv:1907.00707 (2019).Google Scholar
- Frank Leymann, Johanna Barzen, and Michael Falkenthal. 2019. Towards a Platform for Sharing Quantum Software. Proceedings of the 13th Advanced Summer School on Service (2019), 70--74.Google Scholar
- Seth Lloyd, Masoud Mohseni, and Patrick Rebentrost. 2013. Quantum algorithms for supervised and unsupervised machine learning. arXiv:1307.0411 (2013).Google Scholar
- Seth Lloyd and Christian Weedbrook. 2018. Quantum generative adversarial learning. arXiv:1804.09139 (2018).Google Scholar
- Andrew Lucas. 2014. Ising formulations of many NP problems. Frontiers in Physics 2 (2014), 5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A Manju and Madhav J Nigam. 2014. Applications of quantum inspired computational intelligence: a survey. Artificial Intelligence Review 42, 1 (2014), 79--156.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Catherine C McGeoch. 2014. Adiabatic quantum computation and quantum annealing: Theory and practice. Synthesis Lectures on Quantum Computing 5, 2 (2014), 1--93.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Catherine C McGeoch and Cong Wang. 2013. Experimental evaluation of an adiabiatic quantum system for combinatorial optimization. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers. 1--11.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ofir Nachum, Shixiang Shane Gu, Honglak Lee, and Sergey Levine. 2018. Data-efficient hierarchical reinforcement learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 3303--3313.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Florian Neukart, David Von Dollen, Christian Seidel, and Gabriele Compostella. 2018. Quantum-enhanced reinforcement learning for finite-episode games with discrete state spaces. arXiv:1708.09354v3 (2018).Google Scholar
- Oscar Nierstrasz, Marcus Denker, Tudor Gîrba, Adrian Lienhard, and David Röthlisberger. 2008. Change-enabled software systems. In Software-Intensive Systems and New Computing Paradigms. Springer, 64--79.Google Scholar
- PennyLane. [n. d.]. VQE implementation. https://pennylane.ai/qml/demos/tutorial_vqe.html.Google Scholar
- Alejandro Perdomo-Ortiz, Marcello Benedetti, John Realpe-Gómez, and Rupak Biswas. 2018. Opportunities and challenges for quantum-assisted machine learning in near-term quantum computers. Quantum Science and Technology 3, 3 (2018), 030502.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alberto Peruzzo, Jarrod McClean, Peter Shadbolt, Man-Hong Yung, Xiao-Qi Zhou, Peter J Love, Alán Aspuru-Guzik, and Jeremy L O'brien. 2014. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor. Nature commun. 5 (2014).Google Scholar
- Riccardo Porotti, Dario Tamascelli, Marcello Restelli, and Enrico Prati. 2019. Coherent transport of quantum states by deep reinforcement learning. Communications Physics 2, 1 (2019), 1--9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John Preskill. 2018. Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond. arXiv:1801.00862v3 (2018).Google Scholar
- Jonathan Romero and Alan Aspuru-Guzik. 2019. Variational quantum generators: Generative adversarial quantum machine learning for continuous distributions. arXiv:1901.00848 (2019).Google Scholar
- Jonathan Romero, Jonathan P Olson, and Alan Aspuru-Guzik. 2017. Quantum autoencoders for efficient compression of quantum data. arXiv:1612.02806v2 (2017).Google Scholar
- Sukin Sim, Evan Anderson, Eric Brown, and Jonathan Romero. [n. d.]. Autoencoder implementation. https://github.com/hsim13372/QCompress-1.Google Scholar
- Richard Sutton. 2019. The Bitter Lesson. http://www.incompleteideas.net/IncIdeas/BitterLesson.html.Google Scholar
- The AlphaStar team. 2019. AlphaStar: Mastering the Real-Time Strategy Game StarCraft II. https://deepmind.com/blog/article/alphastar-mastering-real-time-strategy-game-starcraft-ii.Google Scholar
- Danny Weyns. 2017. Software engineering of self-adaptive systems: an organised tour and future challenges. (2017).Google Scholar
- Nathan Wiebe, Ashish Kapoor, and Krysta Svore. 2014. Quantum algorithms for nearest-neighbor methods for supervised and unsupervised learning. arXiv:1401.2142v2 (2014).Google Scholar
- Nathan Wiebe and Leonard Wossnig. 2019. Generative training of quantum Boltzmann machines with hidden units. arXiv:1905.09902 (2019).Google Scholar
- D. Willsch, M. Willsch, H. De Raedt, and K. Michielsen. 2019. Support vector machines on the D-Wave quantum annealer. arXiv:1906.06283 (2019).Google Scholar
- Stephen Wolfram. 2018. Buzzword Convergence: Making Sense of Quantum Neural Blockchain AI. https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2018/04/buzzword-convergence-making-sense-of-quantum-neural-blockchain-ai/.Google Scholar
- Christa Zoufal, Aurélien Lucchi, and Stefan Woerner. 2019. Quantum generative adversarial networks for learning and loading random distributions. arXiv:1904.00043 (2019).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- The Holy Grail of Quantum Artificial Intelligence: Major Challenges in Accelerating the Machine Learning Pipeline
Recommendations
Principles of Quantum Mechanics for Artificial Intelligence in medicine. Discussion with reference to the Quantum Universal Exchange Language (Q-UEL)
AbstractThis paper reviews some basic principles of Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Computing, and Artificial Intelligence in terms of a specific unifying theme. This theme relates to the hyperbolic or split-complex imaginary numbers and their ...
Highlights- An attempt is made to identify and integrate principles of AI and quantum computing.
Integrable quantum computation
Integrable quantum computation is defined as quantum computing via the integrable condition, in which two-qubit gates are either nontrivial unitary solutions of the Yang---Baxter equation or the Swap gate (permutation). To make the definition clear, in ...
Contextuality Supplies the Magic for Quantum Computation
ISMVL '15: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 45th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued LogicWe know that quantum mechanics enables the performance of computational and cryptographic tasks that are impossible (or impracticable) using only classical physics. It seems natural to examine manifestations of inherently quantum behaviour as potential ...
Comments