skip to main content
10.1145/3393691.3394194acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmetricsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Inferring Streaming Video Quality from Encrypted Traffic: Practical Models and Deployment Experience

Published:08 June 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Inferring the quality of streaming video applications is important for Internet service providers, but the fact that most video streams are encrypted makes it difficult to do so. We develop models that infer quality metrics (i.e., startup delay and resolution) for encrypted streaming video services. Our paper builds on previous work, but extends it in several ways. First, the models work in deployment settings where the video sessions and segments must be identified from a mix of traffic and the time precision of the collected traffic statistics is more coarse (e.g., due to aggregation). Second, we develop a single composite model that works for a range of different services (i.e., Netflix, YouTube, Amazon, and Twitch), as opposed to just a single service. Third, unlike many previous models, our models perform predictions at finer granularity (e.g., the precise startup delay instead of just detecting short versus long delays) allowing to draw better conclusions on the ongoing streaming quality. Fourth, we demonstrate the models are practical through a 16-month deployment in 66 homes and provide new insights about the relationships between Internet "speed'' and the quality of the corresponding video streams, for a variety of services; we find that higher speeds provide only minimal improvements to startup delay and resolution.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3393691.3394194.mp4

mp4

105.5 MB

References

  1. 2019. Labeled video sessions dataset. https://nm-public-data.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/dataset/all_traffic_time_10.pkl.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. GSM Association. 2015. Network Management of Encrypted Traffic: Version 1.0.https://www.gsma.com/newsroom/wp-content/uploads/WWG-04-v1-0.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cisco 2017. Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Methodology, 2016--2021. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/complete-white-paper-c11--481360.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Giorgos Dimopoulos, Ilias Leontiadis, Pere Barlet-Ros, and Konstantina Papa-giannaki. 2016. Measuring video QoE from encrypted traffic. In Proceedings of the 2016 Internet Measurement Conference. ACM, 513--526.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Keith Dyer. 2015. How encryption threatens mobile operators, and what they cando about it. http://the-mobile-network.com/2015/01/how-encryption-threatens-mobile-operators-and-what-they-can-do-about-it/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. T. Huang, R. Johari, N. McKeown, M. Trunnell, and M. Watson. 2014. A buffer-based approach to rate adaptation: Evidence from a large video streaming service. In ACM SIGCOMM. Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Vengatanathan Krishnamoorthi, Niklas Carlsson, Emir Halepovic, and Eric Peta-jan. 2017. BUFFEST: Predicting Buffer Conditions and Real-time Requirements of HTTP(S) Adaptive Streaming Clients. In MMSys'17. Taipei, Taiwan.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Hammad Mazhar and Zubair Shafiq. 2018. Real-time Video Quality of Experience Monitoring for HTTPS and QUIC. In INFOCOM. Honolulu, HI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Abhijit Mondal, Satadal Sengupta, Bachu Rikith Reddy, MJV Koundinya, Chander Govindarajan, Pradipta De, Niloy Ganguly, and Sandip Chakraborty. 2017. Candid with YouTube: Adaptive Streaming Behavior and Implications on Data Consumption. In NOSSDAV'17. Taipei, Taiwan.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Openwave Mobility. 2018. Mobile Video Index. https://landing.owmobility.com/mobile-video-index/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sandvine. 2015. Global Internet Phenomena Spotlight: Encrypted Internet Traffic. https://www.sandvine.com/hubfs/downloads/archive/global-internet-phenomena-spotlight-encrypted-internet-traffic.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. T. Stockhammer. 2011. Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP: standards and design principles. In ACM Conference on Multimedia Systems (MMSys '11). San Jose, CA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. The Wall Street Journal 2019. The Truth About Faster Internet: It's Not Worth It.https://www.wsj.com/graphics/faster-internet-not-worth-it/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Inferring Streaming Video Quality from Encrypted Traffic: Practical Models and Deployment Experience

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGMETRICS '20: Abstracts of the 2020 SIGMETRICS/Performance Joint International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems
            June 2020
            124 pages
            ISBN:9781450379854
            DOI:10.1145/3393691

            Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 8 June 2020

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • abstract

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate459of2,691submissions,17%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader