skip to main content
10.1145/3394171.3413598acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Heterogeneous Fusion of Semantic and Collaborative Information for Visually-Aware Food Recommendation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Visually-aware food recommendation recommends food items based on their visual features. Existing methods typically use the pre-extracted visual features from food classification models, which mainly encode the visual content with limited semantic information, such as the classes and ingredients. Therefore, such features may not cover the personalized visual preferences of users, termed collaborative information, e.g. users may attend to different colors and textures of food based on their preferred ingredients and cooking methods. To address this problem, this paper presents a heterogeneous multi-task learning framework, termed privileged-channel infused network (PiNet). It learns the visual features that contain both the semantic and collaborative information by training the image encoder to simultaneously fulfill the ingredient prediction and food recommendation tasks. However, the heterogeneity between the two tasks may lead to different visual information in need and different directions in model parameter optimization. To handle these challenges, PiNet first employs a dual-gating module (DGM) to enable the encoding and passing of different visual information from the image encoder to individual tasks. Secondly, PiNet adopts a two-phase training strategy and two prior knowledge incorporation methods to ensure an effective model training. Experimental results from two real-world datasets show that the visual features generated by PiNet better attend to the informative image regions, yielding superior performance.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3394171.3413598.mp4

mp4

6.8 MB

References

  1. Marc Bola nos, Aina Ferrà, and Petia Radeva. 2017. Food ingredients recognition through multi-label learning. In International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing. Springer, 394--402.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chih-Ming Chen, Chuan-Ju Wang, Ming-Feng Tsai, and Yi-Hsuan Yang. 2019 b. Collaborative Similarity Embedding for Recommender Systems. In The World Wide Web Conference. ACM, 2637--2643.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jingjing Chen and Chong-Wah Ngo. 2016. Deep-based ingredient recognition for cooking recipe retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Multimedia Conference. ACM, 32--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Xu Chen, Hanxiong Chen, Hongteng Xu, Yongfeng Zhang, Yixin Cao, Hongyuan Zha, and Zheng Qin. 2019 a. Personalized Fashion Recommendation with Visual Explanations based on Multi-model Attention Network. In SIGIR. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhiyong Cheng, Xiaojun Chang, Lei Zhu, Rose C. Kanjirathinkal, and Mohan Kankanhalli. 2019. MMALFM: Explainable Recommendation by Leveraging Reviews and Images. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 37, 2 (2019), 16:1--16:28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Wei-Ta Chu and Ya-Lun Tsai. 2017. A hybrid recommendation system considering visual information for predicting favorite restaurants. World Wide Web, Vol. 20, 6 (2017), 1313--1331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. David Elsweiler, Christoph Trattner, and Morgan Harvey. 2017. Exploiting food choice biases for healthier recipe recommendation. In Proceedings of the 40th international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 575--584.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jill Freyne and Shlomo Berkovsky. 2010. Intelligent food planning: personalized recipe recommendation. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM, 321--324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Xiaoyan Gao, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He, Heyan Huang, Xinyu Guan, Chong Feng, Zhaoyan Ming, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2019. Hierarchical Attention Network for Visually-aware Food Recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, Vol. In press (2019), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mouzhi Ge, Mehdi Elahi, Ignacio Fernaández-Tob'ias, Francesco Ricci, and David Massimo. 2015a. Using tags and latent factors in a food recommender system. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Digital Health. ACM, 105--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Mouzhi Ge, Francesco Ricci, and David Massimo. 2015b. Health-aware food recommender system. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 333--334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ruining He and Julian McAuley. 2016. VBPR: visual bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Xiangnan He, Kuan Deng, Xiang Wang, Yan Li, YongDong Zhang, and Meng Wang. 2020. LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for Recommendation. Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (2020), 639--648.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. W. Kang, C. Fang, Z. Wang, and J. McAuley. 2017. Visually-Aware Fashion Recommendation and Design with Generative Image Models. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). 207--216.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Deborah A Kerr et al. 2016. The connecting health and technology study: a 6-month randomized controlled trial to improve nutrition behaviours using a mobile food record and text messaging support in young adults. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol. 13, 1 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Fang-Fei Kuo, Cheng-Te Li, Man-Kwan Shan, and Suh-Yin Lee. 2012. Intelligent menu planning: Recommending set of recipes by ingredients. In Proceedings of the ACM multimedia 2012 workshop on Multimedia for cooking and eating activities. ACM, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Wenqiang Lei, Xiangnan He, Yisong Miao, Qingyun Wu, Richang Hong, Min-Yen Kan, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2020. Estimation-action-reflection: Towards deep interaction between conversational and recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 304--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Chia-Jen Lin, Tsung-Ting Kuo, and Shou-De Lin. 2014. A content-based matrix factorization model for recipe recommendation. In Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Springer, 560--571.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Niki Martinel, Gian Luca Foresti, and Christian Micheloni. 2018. Wide-slice residual networks for food recognition. In IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). IEEE, 567--576.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Lei Meng, Long Chen, Xun Yang, Dacheng Tao, Hanwang Zhang, Chunyan Miao, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2019. Learning using privileged information for food recognition. In ACM international conference on Multimedia. ACM, 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Michele Merler, Hui Wu, Rosario Uceda-Sosa, Quoc-Bao Nguyen, and John R Smith. 2016. Snap, Eat, RepEat: a food recognition engine for dietary logging. In Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on multimedia assisted dietary management. ACM, 31--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Austin Meyers, Nick Johnston, Vivek Rathod, Anoop Korattikara, Alex Gorban, Nathan Silberman, Sergio Guadarrama, George Papandreou, Jonathan Huang, and Kevin P Murphy. 2015. Im2Calories: towards an automated mobile vision food diary. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 1233--1241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Zhaoyan Ming, Jingjing Chen, Yu Cao, Ciarán Forde, Chong-Wah Ngo, and Tat Seng Chua. 2018. Food Photo Recognition for Dietary Tracking: System and Experiment. In International Conference on Multimedia Modeling. Springer, 129--141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Charles Packer, Julian McAuley, and Arnau Ramisa. 2018. Visually-Aware Personalized Recommendation using Interpretable Image Representations. In AI for Fashion workshop, held in conjunction with KDD. 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Steffen Rendle, Christoph Freudenthaler, Zeno Gantner, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 2009. BPR: Bayesian Personalized Ranking from Implicit Feedback. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI '09). AUAI Press, 452--461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Doyen Sahoo, Wang Hao, Shu Ke, Wu Xiongwei, Hung Le, Palakorn Achananuparp, Ee-Peng Lim, and Steven CH Hoi. 2019. FoodAI: Food Image Recognition via Deep Learning for Smart Food Logging. In KDD. 2260--2268.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ramprasaath R Selvaraju, Michael Cogswell, Abhishek Das, Ramakrishna Vedantam, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. 2017. Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 618--626.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Chun-Yuen Teng, Yu-Ru Lin, and Lada A Adamic. 2012. Recipe recommendation using ingredient networks. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference. ACM, 298--307.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Christoph Trattner and David Elsweiler. 2017. Investigating the healthiness of internet-sourced recipes: implications for meal planning and recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 489--498.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Mayumi Ueda, Mari Takahata, and Shinsuke Nakajima. 2011. User's food preference extraction for personalized cooking recipe recommendation. In Workshop of ISWC. 98--105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Youri van Pinxteren, Gijs Geleijnse, and Paul Kamsteeg. 2011. Deriving a recipe similarity measure for recommending healthful meals. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM, 105--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Vladimir Vapnik and Rauf Izmailov. 2015. Learning using privileged information: similarity control and knowledge transfer. Journal of machine learning research, Vol. 16, 2023--2049 (2015), 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Vladimir Vapnik and Akshay Vashist. 2009. A new learning paradigm: Learning using privileged information. Neural networks, Vol. 22, 5--6 (2009), 544--557.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Liping Wang, Qing Li, Na Li, Guozhu Dong, and Yu Yang. 2008. Substructure similarity measurement in chinese recipes. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 979--988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Suhang Wang, Yilin Wang, Jiliang Tang, Kai Shu, Suhas Ranganath, and Huan Liu. 2017. What your images reveal: Exploiting visual contents for point-of-interest recommendation. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web. 391--400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Longqi Yang, Yin Cui, Fan Zhang, John P. Pollak, Serge Belongie, and Deborah Estrin. 2015. PlateClick: Bootstrapping Food Preferences Through an Adaptive Visual Interface. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (Melbourne, Australia) (CIKM'15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 183--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Longqi Yang, Cheng-Kang Hsieh, Hongjian Yang, John P. Pollak, Nicola Dell, Serge Belongie, Curtis Cole, and Deborah Estrin. 2017a. Yum-Me: A Personalized Nutrient-Based Meal Recommender System. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 36, 1, Article 7 (2017), 31 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Xun Yang, Meng Wang, Richang Hong, Qi Tian, and Yong Rui. 2017c. Enhancing person re-identification in a self-trained subspace. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), Vol. 13, 3 (2017), 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Xun Yang, Meng Wang, and Dacheng Tao. 2017b. Person re-identification with metric learning using privileged information. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 27, 2 (2017), 791--805.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Yongfeng Zhang, Qingyao Ai, Xu Chen, and W. Bruce Croft. 2017. Joint Representation Learning for Top-N Recommendation with Heterogeneous Information Sources. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 1449--1458.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Heterogeneous Fusion of Semantic and Collaborative Information for Visually-Aware Food Recommendation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MM '20: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
      October 2020
      4889 pages
      ISBN:9781450379885
      DOI:10.1145/3394171

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 October 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      MM '24
      MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
      October 28 - November 1, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader